Plant canopy temperature is used in many studies of plant/environment interactions and non-contact measurement is often made with radiometric surface thermometers commonly referred to as infrared thermometers. Industrial-quality infrared thermocouples are widely available and often used in agricultural research. While research on canopy temperature has provided management tools for production agriculture, the high cost of the industrial-quality infrared thermocouples has limited their adoption and use in production agriculture settings. Our objective was to evaluate a low-cost consumer-quality infrared thermocouple as a component of a wireless thermal monitoring system designed for use in a production agriculture setting. The performances of industrial-quality and low-cost consumer-quality sensors were compared under controlled constant temperature and under field conditions using both grass and cotton canopies. Results demonstrate that under controlled constant-temperature the two types of infrared thermocouples were ''significantly the same'' at 10^oC, 20^oC and 30^oC and ''significantly not the same'' at 40^oC and 50^oC. Across the temperature range tested, the consumer-quality infrared thermocouples temperature reading was closer to the thermocouple reading than the industrial-quality infrared thermocouples. A field comparison of industrial-quality and consumer-quality infrared thermocouple sensors monitoring a grass canopy and a cotton canopy indicated that the two types of sensors were similar over a 13-35^oC range. The measurement of temperature made with two types of sensors would not differ significantly. Based on these results we conclude that the lower-cost consumer-quality infrared thermometers are suitable for use in production agricultural applications.
[1]
Sherwood B. Idso,et al.
Non-water-stressed baselines: A key to measuring and interpreting plant water stress
,
1982
.
[2]
D. F. Wanjura,et al.
Behavior of temperature-based water stress indicators in BIOTIC-controlled irrigation
,
2006,
Irrigation Science.
[3]
D. F. Wanjura,et al.
Control of irrigation scheduling using temperature-time thresholds
,
1995
.
[4]
D. F. Wanjura,et al.
Determination of temperature and time thresholds for BIOTIC irrigation of peanut on the Southern High Plains of Texas
,
2005,
Irrigation Science.
[5]
M. S. Moran,et al.
Remote Sensing for Crop Management
,
2003
.
[6]
R. Jackson.
Canopy Temperature and Crop Water Stress
,
1982
.
[7]
Daniel Hillel,et al.
Advances in irrigation
,
1982
.
[8]
S. Idso,et al.
Canopy temperature as a crop water stress indicator
,
1981
.
[9]
D. F. Wanjura,et al.
Automated Irrigation Based on Threshold Canopy Temperature
,
1992
.
[10]
Ning Wang,et al.
Review: Wireless sensors in agriculture and food industry-Recent development and future perspective
,
2006
.
[11]
S. Evett,et al.
Modeling diurnal canopy temperature dynamics using one-time-of-day measurements and a reference temperature curve
,
2004
.
[12]
J. Hatfield,et al.
Measuring Plant Stress with an Infrared Thermometer
,
1990
.
[13]
J. R. Mahan,et al.
Thermal environment of cotton irrigated using canopy temperature
,
2004,
Irrigation Science.