A mathematical modelling tool for unravelling the antibody-mediated effects on CTLA-4 interactions

BackgroundMonoclonal antibodies blocking the Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) receptor have revolutionized the field of anti-cancer therapy for the last few years. The human T-cell-based immune responses are modulated by two contradicting signals. CTLA-4 provides a T cell inhibitory signal through its interaction with B7 ligands (B7–1 and B7–2), while CD28 provides a stimulatory signal when interacting with the same ligands. A previous theoretical model has focused on understanding the processes of costimulatory and inhibitory complex formations at the synapse. Nevertheless, the effects of monoclonal antibody (mAb)-mediation on these complexes are relatively unexplored. In this work, we expand on the previous model to develop a new mathematical framework for studying the effects of anti-CTLA-4 mAbs on the co-stimulatory (CD28/B7 ligands) and the co-inhibitory (CTLA-4/B7 ligands) complex formation at the immunological synapse. In particular, we focus on two promising anti-CTLA-4 mAbs, tremelimumab (from AstraZeneca) and ipilimumab (from Bristol-Myers Squibb), which are currently in clinical trials and the market, respectively, for targeting multiple tumors.MethodsThe mathematical model in this work has been constructed based on ordinary differential equations and available experimental binding kinetics data for the anti-CTLA-4 antibodies from literature.ResultsThe numerical simulations from the current model are in agreement with a number of experimental data. Especially, the dose-curves for blocking the B7 ligand binding to CTLA-4 by ipilimumab are comparable with the results from a previous competitive binding assay by flow cytometry and ELISA. Our simulations predict the dose response and the relative efficacies of the two mAbs in blocking the inhibitory CTLA-4/B7 complexes.ConclusionsThe results show that different factors, such as multivalent interactions, mobility of molecules and competition effects, could impact the effects of antibody-mediation. The results, in particular, describe that the competitive effects could impact the dose-dependent inhibition by the mAbs very significantly. We present this model as a useful tool that can easily be translated to study the effects of any anti-CTLA-4 antibodies on immunological synaptic complex formation, provided reliable biophysical data for mAbs are available.

[1]  C. Horak,et al.  Nivolumab plus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  M. Vetizou,et al.  Resistance Mechanisms to Immune-Checkpoint Blockade in Cancer: Tumor-Intrinsic and -Extrinsic Factors. , 2016, Immunity.

[3]  Andrea Iaboni,et al.  The interaction properties of costimulatory molecules revisited. , 2002, Immunity.

[4]  J. Egen,et al.  B7-1 and B7-2 selectively recruit CTLA-4 and CD28 to the immunological synapse. , 2004, Immunity.

[5]  P. Linsley,et al.  Covalent Dimerization of CD28/CTLA-4 and Oligomerization of CD80/CD86 Regulate T Cell Costimulatory Interactions* , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[6]  G. Kumar,et al.  AJAX Interface: A Breakthrough in Bioinformatics Web Applications , 2009 .

[7]  M. Jure-Kunkel,et al.  CTLA-4 blockade in tumor models: an overview of preclinical and translational research. , 2013, Cancer immunity.

[8]  B K Jakobsen,et al.  Molecular interactions of coreceptor CD8 and MHC class I: the molecular basis for functional coordination with the T-cell receptor. , 2000, Immunology today.

[9]  George F. Gao,et al.  Molecular coordination of αβ T-cell receptors and coreceptors CD8 and CD4 in their recognition of peptide-MHC ligands , 2002 .

[10]  P. Linsley,et al.  Binding Stoichiometry of the Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte-associated Molecule-4 (CTLA-4) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[11]  M. Mandalà,et al.  Targeting the PD1/PD-L1 axis in melanoma: biological rationale, clinical challenges and opportunities. , 2014, Critical reviews in oncology/hematology.

[12]  J. Larkin,et al.  Pembrolizumab versus Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  S. Chikuma CTLA-4, an Essential Immune-Checkpoint for T-Cell Activation. , 2017, Current topics in microbiology and immunology.

[14]  P. Bretscher,et al.  A two-step, two-signal model for the primary activation of precursor helper T cells. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  F. Z. Nouri,et al.  Modeling bispecific monoclonal antibody interaction with two cell membrane targets indicates the importance of surface diffusion , 2016, mAbs.

[16]  Drew M. Pardoll,et al.  The blockade of immune checkpoints in cancer immunotherapy , 2012, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[17]  Y. Kogan,et al.  Improving T-cell Immunotherapy for Melanoma Through a Mathematically Motivated Strategy: Efficacy in Numbers? , 2012, Journal of immunotherapy.

[18]  P. Linsley,et al.  CTLA-4 is a second receptor for the B cell activation antigen B7 , 1991, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[19]  A. Gorman,et al.  A mathematical model of the effector cell response to cancer , 2004 .

[20]  Melvin Cohn,et al.  A Theory of Self-Nonself Discrimination , 1970, Science.

[21]  J. Wolchok,et al.  Immune Checkpoint Blockade in Cancer Therapy. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[22]  J. Reichert,et al.  Antibodies to watch in 2018 , 2018, mAbs.

[23]  J. Egen,et al.  Cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 accumulation in the immunological synapse is regulated by TCR signal strength. , 2002, Immunity.

[24]  P. A. Futreal,et al.  Integrated molecular analysis of tumor biopsies on sequential CTLA-4 and PD-1 blockade reveals markers of response and resistance , 2017, Science Translational Medicine.

[25]  A. Korman,et al.  Activity and Safety of CTLA-4 Blockade Combined with Vaccines in Cynomolgus Macaques , 2003, The Journal of Immunology.

[26]  G. I. Bell Models for the specific adhesion of cells to cells. , 1978, Science.

[27]  D. Schadendorf,et al.  Improved survival with ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[28]  C. Thompson,et al.  At the Bench: Preclinical rationale for CTLA‐4 and PD‐1 blockade as cancer immunotherapy , 2013, Journal of leukocyte biology.

[29]  C. Bidot,et al.  Mathematical Modeling of T-Cell Activation Kinetic , 2008, J. Comput. Biol..

[30]  Yan Zhang,et al.  Crystal structure of the B7-1/CTLA-4 complex that inhibits human immune responses , 2001, Nature.

[31]  Mauro Ferrari,et al.  Mathematical modeling of cancer progression and response to chemotherapy , 2006, Expert review of anticancer therapy.

[32]  D. Kirschner,et al.  Modeling immunotherapy of the tumor – immune interaction , 1998, Journal of mathematical biology.

[33]  S. Ryu,et al.  Structural basis of checkpoint blockade by monoclonal antibodies in cancer immunotherapy , 2016, Nature Communications.

[34]  G. Gao,et al.  Remarkably similar CTLA-4 binding properties of therapeutic ipilimumab and tremelimumab antibodies , 2017, Oncotarget.

[35]  S. Almo,et al.  Structural basis for cancer immunotherapy by the first-in-class checkpoint inhibitor ipilimumab , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  G. Linette,et al.  Nivolumab and ipilimumab versus ipilimumab in untreated melanoma. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[37]  P. Hsu,et al.  Cancer immunotherapy by targeting immune checkpoints: mechanism of T cell dysfunction in cancer immunity and new therapeutic targets , 2017, Journal of Biomedical Science.

[38]  J. Wargo,et al.  Hallmarks of response to immune checkpoint blockade , 2017, British Journal of Cancer.

[39]  T. Graeber,et al.  Mutations Associated with Acquired Resistance to PD-1 Blockade in Melanoma. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[40]  John E. Ladbury,et al.  Structure and Interactions of the Human Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor* , 2013, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[41]  T. Strutt,et al.  Control of innate immunity by memory CD4 T cells. , 2011, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[42]  Lisette G de Pillis,et al.  A validated mathematical model of cell-mediated immune response to tumor growth. , 2007, Cancer research.

[43]  P. Linsley,et al.  CD80 (B7-1) Binds Both CD28 and CTLA-4 with a Low Affinity and Very Fast Kinetics , 1997, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[44]  G. Kumar,et al.  A Novel Strategy for Mechanism Based Computational Drug Discovery , 2010, Biomarkers in cancer.

[45]  B. Comin-Anduix,et al.  Tremelimumab: research and clinical development , 2016, OncoTargets and therapy.

[46]  Alain Goriely,et al.  A mathematical model of tumor-immune interactions. , 2012, Journal of theoretical biology.

[47]  P. Klenerman,et al.  A Theoretical Framework for Quantitative Analysis of the Molecular Basis of Costimulation , 2005, The Journal of Immunology.

[48]  D. Sansom,et al.  CD28, CTLA‐4 and their ligands: who does what and to whom? , 2000, Immunology.

[49]  M. Valsecchi Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab or Monotherapy in Untreated Melanoma. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[50]  G. Freeman,et al.  The B7–CD28 superfamily , 2002, Nature Reviews Immunology.