General Derivation of the Sets of Pedigrees with the Same Kinship Coefficients

Quantification of kinships between two individuals using unlinked autosomal markers rests upon the identity-by-descent (IBD) probabilities among their four alleles at a locus because they determine the algebraic expressions of the joint genotypic probabilities. Nevertheless, some pedigrees share the same IBD probabilities and are therefore indistinguishable using those markers. Examples of these pedigrees were previously described, such as the case of half-siblings, grandparent-grandchild and avuncular, but a general analysis has not been attempted. The aim of this study is to present a systematic and mathematically supported framework where considering unlinked autosomal markers complete sets of indistinguishable pedigrees linking two non-inbred individuals are generally derived. In our work, complete sets of pedigrees with the same IBD partitions are formally established and mathematically treated, considering kinships linking any pair of non-inbred individuals, whether they are related just maternally or paternally, or both. Moreover, general expressions for IBD partitions, and consequently for joint genotypic probabilities, are derived considering a simple counting rule based on two ‘atom’ pedigrees: parent-child and full-siblings. Besides the theoretical formalization of the problem, the developed framework has potential applications in forensics as well as in breeding strategies design and in conservation studies.

[1]  A. Jacquard The Genetic Structure of Populations , 1974 .

[2]  E A Thompson,et al.  The estimation of pairwise relationships , 1975, Annals of human genetics.

[3]  K. P. Donnelly,et al.  The probability that related individuals share some section of genome identical by descent. , 1983, Theoretical population biology.

[4]  R. Spritz,et al.  Autosomal recessive ocular albinism associated with a functionally significant tyrosinase gene polymorphism , 1995, Nature Genetics.

[5]  E. A. Thompson,et al.  Genetic linkage in the estimation of pairwise relationship , 1998, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[6]  Dw Van Boxel,et al.  Probabilistic Expert Systems for Forensic Inference from Genetic Markers , 2002 .

[7]  Michael S. Blouin,et al.  DNA-based methods for pedigree reconstruction and kinship analysis in natural populations , 2003 .

[8]  P. Gill,et al.  Encoded evidence: DNA in forensic analysis , 2004, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[9]  Charles H Brenner,et al.  Some mathematical problems in the DNA identification of victims in the 2004 tsunami and similar mass fatalities. , 2006, Forensic science international.

[10]  Amanda B. Hepler,et al.  Genetic relatedness analysis: modern data and new challenges , 2006, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[11]  T. Egeland,et al.  DNA-testing for immigration cases: the risk of erroneous conclusions. , 2007, Forensic science international.

[12]  Matti Pirinen,et al.  Estimating genealogies from unlinked marker data: a Bayesian approach. , 2007, Theoretical population biology.

[13]  Thore Egeland,et al.  On identification problems requiring linked autosomal markers. , 2008, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[14]  M. Krawczak,et al.  Potentials and limits of pairwise kinship analysis using autosomal short tandem repeat loci , 2010, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[15]  Øivind Skare,et al.  Identification of distant family relationships , 2009, Bioinform..

[16]  N. Pinto,et al.  Likelihood ratios in kinship analysis: contrasting kinship classes, not genealogies. , 2010, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[17]  N. Pinto,et al.  X-chromosome markers in kinship testing: a generalisation of the IBD approach identifying situations where their contribution is crucial. , 2011, Forensic science international. Genetics.