Urethral pressure profile assessment after artificial urinary sphincter implantation (FlowSecure™ and AMS-800™): A case series

The AMS-800™ artificial urinary sphincter has become the ‘gold standard’ in the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence. In 2006, the novel artificial urinary sphincter FlowSecure™ containing a stress relief balloon providing low cuff pressures at rest with conditional pressure elevation during periods of stress has been launched. We assessed the intraurethral pressure in the cuff area of the AMS-800 and the FlowSecure by urethral pressure profile in four patients each. Urethral pressure profile was performed at rest and during coughing. In addition, continence situation and patient satisfaction after artificial urinary sphincter implantation was assessed. At rest, median pressure in the cuff region was 74 (38–117, FlowSecure) cm H2O and 102 (95–110, AMS-800) cm H2O. During coughing, pressure peaks rose to 135 (54–162, FlowSecure) cm H2O and 202 (128–216, AMS-800) cm H2O. Median pad usage before artificial urinary sphincter implantation in the FlowSecure and the AMS-800 group was 4 (3–4) and 4.5 (2–6) pads/24 h, respectively. At the time of urodynamic investigation, median pad usage declined to 1.5 (0–4) pads/24 h in the FlowSecure and to 1 (1–2) pads/24 h in the AMS-800 group. Seven of eight patients reported on a satisfactory quality of life, and one patient remained unhappy after FlowSecure implantation. It remains unclear if the trade-off in favour of lower cuff pressures, and consecutively lower intraurethral pressures, holds truly long-term benefits regarding device revision, explantation and patient satisfaction.

[1]  F. Joly,et al.  Long-term quality of life among localised prostate cancer survivors: QALIPRO population-based study. , 2016, European journal of cancer.

[2]  A. Mundy,et al.  Urethral atrophy after implantation of an artificial urinary sphincter: fact or fiction? , 2016, BJU international.

[3]  P. Mozer,et al.  Long‐term functional outcomes after artificial urinary sphincter implantation in men with stress urinary incontinence , 2015, BJU international.

[4]  Á. Atallah,et al.  Surgery for stress urinary incontinence due to presumed sphincter deficiency after prostate surgery. , 2014, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[5]  M. Drake,et al.  The artificial urinary sphincter after a quarter of a century: a critical systematic review of its use in male non-neurogenic incontinence. , 2013, European urology.

[6]  H. G. van der Poel,et al.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. , 2012, European urology.

[7]  F. García-Montes,et al.  Surgical Implantation of the New FlowSecure™ Artificial Urinary Sphincter in the Female Bladder Neck , 2007, Urologia Internationalis.

[8]  M. Craggs,et al.  ["FlowSecure" artificial urinary sphincter: a new adjustable artificial urinary sphincter concept with conditional occlusion for stress urinary incontinence]. , 2007, Actas urologicas espanolas.

[9]  M. Craggs,et al.  Esfínter Urinario Artificial “FlowSecureTM”: Un nuevo concepto de esfínter artificial regulable y con oclusión condicional para la incontinencia urinaria de esfuerzo , 2007 .

[10]  M. Craggs,et al.  A new artificial urinary sphincter with conditional occlusion for stress urinary incontinence: preliminary clinical results. , 2006, European urology.

[11]  A. Mundy,et al.  The long-term outcome of artificial urinary sphincters. , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[12]  J. K. Light,et al.  Impact of the new cuff design on reliability of the AS800 artificial urinary sphincter. , 1992, The Journal of urology.

[13]  F. B. Scott,et al.  Treatment of urinary incontinence by an implantable prosthetic urinary sphincter , 1974 .