Application of numerical classification in ecological investigations of water pollution

Numerical classification encompasses a variety of techniques for the grouping of entities based on the resemblance of their attributes according to mathematically stated criteria. In ecology this usually involves classific~tion of collections, representing sites or sampling per1ods, or classification of species. Classification can thus simplify patterns of collection resemblance or species distribution patterns in an instructive and efficient manne r. Procedures of numerical classification are thoroughly reviewed, including data manipulations, computation ~f r e semblance measures and clustering methods. The 1mportance and e ffects of transformations and standardizations are di s cussed. It is particularly critical to choose an appropriate resemblance measure which best corresponds with the investigator's concept of ecological resemblance. Clus tering methods form groups on the basis of patter~s of inte r-entity similarity. Various types of clusterlng me thods e xist but currently the most useful and best de veloped are those which are exclusive, intrinsic, . hierarchical and agglomerative. Agglomerative clusterlng me thods which distort spatial relationships and intensely c luster are often most useful with ecological data. The value of post-clustering analyses in the interpretation of the results of numerical classifications is stressed. Thes e include reallocation of misclassified entities, comparison of classifications of collections with thos~ of species (nodal analysis), comparing alternate c~assl­ fi cations, testing differences among groups, relatlng clas sification to extrinsic environmental factors and i nterfacing classification with other multivariate analyses. The use f ulne ss of numerical classification is demonstrated f or obj ec tive analysis of the data sets resulting from field s urveys and monitoring studies conducted for the assessme nt of effe cts of pollution. However, to date few. pol l ution bio logists have applied the more powerful classlf i catory tec h nique s and post-clustering analyses.

[1]  B. Wade A description of a highly diverse soft-bottom community in Kingston Harbour, Jamaica , 1972, Marine Biology.

[2]  Robert H. Whittaker,et al.  Ordination and classification of communities , 1973 .

[3]  D. Boesch Classification and community structure of macrobenthos in the Hampton Roads area, Virginia , 1973 .

[4]  Yossi Loya,et al.  Community structure and species diversity of hermatypic corals at Eilat, Red Sea , 1972 .

[5]  A. R. Ward Studies on the sublittoral free-living nematodes of Liverpool Bay. I. The structure and distribution of the nematode populations , 1973 .

[6]  J. T. Curtis,et al.  An Ordination of the Upland Forest Communities of Southern Wisconsin , 1957 .

[7]  R. Swartz Biological criteria of environmental change in the Chesapeake Bay , 1972 .

[8]  E. J. Burr Cluster Sorting with Mixed Character Types, I - Standardization of Character Values , 1968, Aust. Comput. J..

[9]  W. T. Williams,et al.  The analysis of three-dimensional data (sites × species × times) in marine ecology , 1973 .

[10]  D. F. Grigal,et al.  COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR THE ORDINATION AND CLASSIFICATION OF ECOSYSTEMS. , 1972 .

[11]  J. G. Field The Use of the Information Statistic in the Numerical Classification of Heterogeneous Systems , 1969 .

[12]  S. Mann,et al.  A Reinvestigation of Southern California Rocky Intertidal Beaches Three and One-Half Years after the 1969 Santa Barbara Oil Spill: A Preliminary Report , 1973 .

[13]  Jean-Paul Benzecri,et al.  STATISTICAL ANALYSIS AS A TOOL TO MAKE PATTERNS EMERGE FROM DATA , 1969 .

[14]  M. Littler,et al.  Impact of sewage on the distribution, abundance and community structure of rocky intertidal macro-organisms , 1975 .

[15]  W. T. Williams,et al.  Multivariate Methods in Plant Ecology: VI. Comparison of Information-Analysis and Association-Analysis , 1966 .

[16]  U. Lie,et al.  Benthic Infauna Communities off the Coast of Washington and in Puget Sound: Identification and Distribution of the Communities , 1970 .

[17]  J. Gage Shallow-Water Zonation of Sea-Loch Benthos and Its Relation to Hydrographic and Other Physical Features , 1974, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.

[18]  J. Gower A comparison of some methods of cluster analysis. , 1967, Biometrics.

[19]  J. G. Field,et al.  The Use of Numerical Methods to Determine the Distribution of the Benthic Fauna Across the Continental Shelf of North Carolina , 1971 .

[20]  J. H. Stone The Chaetognatha Community of the Agulhas Current: Its Structure and Related Properties , 1969 .

[21]  R. Eagle Natural fluctuations in a soft bottom benthic community , 1975, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.

[22]  E. J. S.,et al.  Quantitative Plant Ecology , 1934, Nature.

[23]  D. W. Goodall Statistical Plant Ecology , 1970 .

[24]  J. Looman,et al.  Adaptation of Sorensen's K (1948) for Estimating Unit Affinities in Prairie Vegetation , 1960 .

[25]  John C. Ogilvie,et al.  Evaluation of hierarchical grouping techniques; a preliminary study , 1972, Comput. J..

[26]  M. Thorrington-Smith West Indian Ocean phytoplankton: a numerical investigation of phytohydrographic regions and their characteristic phytoplankton associations , 1971 .

[27]  Mark Hill,et al.  Indicator species analysis, a divisive polythetic method of classification, and its application to a survey of native pinewoods in Scotland , 1975 .

[28]  J. Musick,et al.  Benthic-slope fishes found at 900m depth along a transect in the western N. Atlantic Ocean , 1974 .

[29]  D. Eisma The distribution of benthic marine molluscs off the main Dutch coast , 1966 .

[30]  E. Fager,et al.  Determination and Analysis of Recurrent Groups , 1957, Ecology.

[31]  J. Grassle,et al.  Opportunistic life histories and genetic systems in marine benthic polychaetes , 1974 .

[32]  P. Chardy Ecologie des crustacés péracarides des fonds rocheux de Banyuls-sur-Mer. Amphipodes, isopodes, tanaidacés, cumacés infra et circalittoraux , 1970 .

[33]  R. Green,et al.  A Multivariate Statistical Approach to the Hutchinsonian Niche: Bivalve Molluscs of Central Canada. , 1971, Ecology.

[34]  D. F. Grigal,et al.  Classification, Description, and Dynamics of Upland Plant Communities within a Minnesota Wilderness Area , 1975 .

[35]  R C Durfee,et al.  A METHOD OF CLUSTER ANALYSIS. , 1970, Multivariate behavioral research.

[36]  J. Cairns,et al.  The Use of Cluster Analysis in the Assessment of Spills of Hazardous Materials , 1974 .

[37]  R. Warwick,et al.  Nearshore zonation of benthic fauna, especially Nematoda, in Loch Etive , 1975, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.

[38]  M. Dale,et al.  Qualitative and Quantitative Information Analysis , 1972 .

[39]  J. Farris,et al.  An Introduction to Numerical Classification , 1976 .

[40]  J. L. Simon,et al.  Animal-sediment relations and community analysis of a Florida estuary , 1972, Marine Biology.

[41]  A. Longhurst,et al.  Recurrent Group Analysis of Species Assemblages of Demersal Fish in the Gulf of Guinea , 1968 .

[42]  F. Nichols Benthic polychaete assemblages and their relationship to the sediment in Port Madison, Washington , 1970 .

[43]  C. Hoek,et al.  Algal zonation in the fringing coral reef of curaçao, Netherlands antilles, in relation to zonation of corals and gorgonians , 1975 .

[44]  D. Boesch,et al.  THE DYNAMICS OF ESTUARINE BENTHIC COMMUNITIES , 1976 .

[45]  E. C. Pielou,et al.  An introduction to mathematical ecology , 1970 .

[46]  B. C. Coull Ecology of marine benthos , 1977 .

[47]  T. E. Bowman The Distribution of Calanoid Copepods Off the Southeastern United States between Cape Hatteras and Southern Florida , 1971 .

[48]  G. N. Lance,et al.  A Note on a New Divisive Classificatory Program for Mixed Data , 1971, Comput. J..

[49]  A. Macfadyen,et al.  Animal Ecology: Aims and Methods , 1970 .