PD-L1 Expression in Metaplastic Breast Carcinoma Using the PD-L1 SP142 Assay and Concordance Among PD-L1 Immunohistochemical Assays

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. Immunotherapy for the treatment of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) positive locally advanced or metastatic triple negative breast cancer may benefit patients with metaplastic breast cancer (MpBC). Previous study of PD-L1 in MpBC scored tumor cells (TCs), different from Food and Drug Administration-approved scoring methods. We sought to define PD-L1 expression in MpBCs and to evaluate concordance of 3 PD-L1 assays. Primary, treatment naive MpBC treated at our Center from 1998 to 2019 were identified. PD-L1 expression was assessed using SP142, E1L3n, and 73-10. We evaluated PD-L1 expression on tumor infiltrating immune cells (IC) and also in TCs. For each assay, we scored PD-L1 expression using ≥1% IC expression according to the IMpassion130 trial criteria and using combined positive score (CPS) ≥10 according to the KEYNOTE-355 trial cutoff. A total of 42 MpBCs were identified. Most MpBC had PD-L1 positivity in ≥1% IC with all 3 assays (95%, 95%, 86%) in contrast to a maximum 71% with a CPS ≥10. PD-L1 IC expression was comparable between the SP142 and 73-10 assays and was lowest with E1L3n. PD-L1 TC expression was lowest using SP142. The overall concordance for IC scoring was 88% while 62% had concordant CPS. For each assay, the results of the 2 scoring algorithms were not interchangeable. The SP142 assay showed distinct expression patterns between IC (granular, dot-like) and TC (membranous) while 73-10 and E1L3n showed membranous and/or cytoplasmic expression in both IC and TC. Most MpBC in our cohort were positive for PD-L1 indicating eligibility for anti-PD-L1/programmed death-1 immunotherapy.

[1]  Anh Nguyen-Duc,et al.  Atezolizumab and nab-Paclitaxel in Advanced Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Biomarker Evaluation of the IMpassion130 Study , 2021, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[2]  Ahn, Jin Hee,et al.  Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy for previously untreated locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (KEYNOTE-355): a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 clinical trial , 2020, The Lancet.

[3]  J. Reis-Filho,et al.  Clinical and pathologic features associated with PD-L1 (SP142) expression in stromal tumor-infiltrating immune cells of triple-negative breast carcinoma , 2020, Modern Pathology.

[4]  R. Gray,et al.  Dual anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 blockade in metaplastic carcinoma of the breast: Dart (SWOG S1609, Cohort 36). , 2020 .

[5]  Amy M. Sitapati,et al.  Breast Cancer, Version 3.2020, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. , 2020, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.

[6]  E. Winer,et al.  Abstract PD1-07: Exploratory analytical harmonization of PD-L1 immunohistochemistry assays in advanced triple-negative breast cancer: A retrospective substudy of IMpassion130 , 2020 .

[7]  Yong Cheng Poh,et al.  Multiplex immunohistochemistry/immunofluorescence (mIHC/IF) for PD-L1 testing in triple-negative breast cancer: a translational assay compared with conventional IHC , 2020, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[8]  C. Perou,et al.  Estrogen and Progesterone Receptor Testing in Breast Cancer: ASCO/CAP Guideline Update. , 2020, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  T. Al-Tweigeri,et al.  Complete Response of Chemo-Refractory Metastatic Metaplastic Breast Cancer to Paclitaxel-Immunotherapy Combination , 2019, The American journal of case reports.

[10]  D. Halligan,et al.  Comprehensive Profiling of Poor-Risk Paired Primary and Recurrent Triple-Negative Breast Cancers Reveals Immune Phenotype Shifts , 2019, Clinical Cancer Research.

[11]  E. Winer,et al.  Performance of PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) assays in unresectable locally advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC): Post-hoc analysis of IMpassion130 , 2019, Annals of Oncology.

[12]  J. Niland,et al.  Molecular characterization of metaplastic breast carcinoma via next-generation sequencing. , 2019, Human pathology.

[13]  J. Lunceford,et al.  Clinical Utility of the Combined Positive Score for Programmed Death Ligand-1 Expression and the Approval of Pembrolizumab for Treatment of Gastric Cancer. , 2018, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[14]  E. Elgabry,et al.  Long-term Clinical Outcomes and Biomarker Analyses of Atezolizumab Therapy for Patients With Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Phase 1 Study , 2019, JAMA oncology.

[15]  L. Pusztai,et al.  Immunological differences between primary and metastatic breast cancer , 2018, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[16]  E. Winer,et al.  Atezolizumab and Nab‐Paclitaxel in Advanced Triple‐Negative Breast Cancer , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  F. Esteva,et al.  Prognosis in different subtypes of metaplastic breast cancer: a population-based analysis , 2018, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[18]  K. Kerr The PD-L1 Immunohistochemistry Biomarker: Two Steps Forward, One Step Back? , 2018, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[19]  T. Khoury,et al.  Metaplastic Carcinoma of the Breast Is More Aggressive Than Triple‐negative Breast Cancer: A Study From a Single Institution and Review of Literature , 2017, Clinical breast cancer.

[20]  B. Calhoun,et al.  Predictive factors on outcomes in metaplastic breast cancer , 2017, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[21]  S. Adams Dramatic response of metaplastic breast cancer to chemo-immunotherapy , 2017, npj Breast Cancer.

[22]  O. Mariani,et al.  The Landscape of Somatic Genetic Alterations in Metaplastic Breast Carcinomas , 2017, Clinical Cancer Research.

[23]  J. Palazzo,et al.  Comprehensive profiling of metaplastic breast carcinomas reveals frequent overexpression of programmed death-ligand 1 , 2016, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[24]  S. Moulder,et al.  Metaplastic Breast Cancer: Clinical Overview and Molecular Aberrations for Potential Targeted Therapy , 2015, Current Oncology Reports.

[25]  G. Brooks,et al.  Sample Size Considerations for Multiple Comparison Procedures in ANOVA , 2011 .

[26]  Anthony Rhodes,et al.  American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer. , 2010, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[27]  Anthony Rhodes,et al.  American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer (unabridged version). , 2010, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[28]  Matteo Brunelli,et al.  HER-2/neu assessment in breast cancer using the original FDA and new ASCO/CAP guideline recommendations: impact on selecting patients for herceptin therapy. , 2008, American journal of clinical pathology.