Issues in User-Centered Design in LIS

The purpose of this article is to survey the landscape of user-centered design in LIS. We begin the article by exploring the history of the "user-centered paradigm," looking first at the historical schism between behavioral science and computer science, and then surveying some of the methods of user-centered design. In the next section we present examples of technological artifacts that reflect the basic functions of information systems—artifacts designed to collect, organize, and retrieve information—as a way to present some of the difficulties and opportunities that surround the creations of user-centered design. Specifically, we look at how user-centered design relates to personal collections, social bookmarking, finding aids, Web interface design, information architecture, visualization systems, and personalization and adaptive search. The article then steps back and looks at design through the wider lens of values, asking the question, how are users represented (or misrepresented) through cultural, ethical, and political forces that influence information system design? The article concludes with a summary of the major issues to emerge from our survey of the current state of user-centered design and from this we extract some key lessons vis à vis research and teaching in LIS.

[1]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences , 1999 .

[2]  Vladimir Slamecka,et al.  INDEXER CONSISTENCY UNDER MINIMAL CONDITIONS , 1962 .

[3]  Leanne Bowler,et al.  Bonded Design: A Methodology for Designing with Children , 2007 .

[4]  Bettina Törpel,et al.  Participatory design: a multi-voiced effort , 2005, Critical Computing.

[5]  Sherry Koshman.  Testing user interaction with a prototype visualization-based information retrieval system , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[6]  Karel Vredenburg,et al.  A survey of user-centered design practice , 2002, CHI.

[7]  Constantine Stephanidis,et al.  User Interfaces for All: Concepts, Methods, and Tools , 2009 .

[8]  Steven K. Feiner,et al.  Visual task characterization for automated visual discourse synthesis , 1998, CHI.

[9]  A. Barry.  On interactivity: Consumers, citizens and culture , 2010 .

[10]  T. Boult,et al.  The eyes have it , 2003, WBMA '03.

[11]  David Bearman.  Archives and Manuscript Control with Bibliographic Utilities: Challenges and Opportunities , 2010 .

[12]  Daniel V. Pitti.  Encoded Archival Description: The Development of an Encoding Standard for Archival Finding Aids , 2009 .

[13]  Fabio Gasparetti,et al.  Personalized Search on the World Wide Web , 2007, The Adaptive Web.

[14]  B. Dervin,et al.  Information needs and uses. , 1986 .

[15]  Richard Pearce-Moses,et al.  Does AMC Mean "Archives Made Confusing"? Patron Understanding of USMARC AMC Catalog Records , 2009 .

[16]  B. G. Callery,et al.  Collaborative Access to Virtual Museum Collection Information: Seeing Through the Walls , 2005 .

[17]  Allison Druin,et al.  Physical programming: designing tools for children to create physical interactive environments , 2002, CHI.

[18]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  The Craft of Information Visualization: Readings and Reflections , 2003 .

[19]  Javed Mostafa,et al.  Empirical evaluation of explicit versus implicit acquisition of user profiles in information filtering systems , 1999, DL '99.

[20]  Richard J. Cox,et al.  Revisiting the Archival Finding Aid , 2008 .

[21]  Ryen W. White,et al.  Comparing Explicit and Implicit Feedback Techniques for Web Retrieval: TREC-10 Interactive Track Report , 2001, TREC.

[22]  Colin Ware,et al.  Information Visualization: Perception for Design , 2000 .

[23]  Alessandro Micarelli,et al.  User Profiles for Personalized Information Access , 2007, The Adaptive Web.

[24]  Alfred Kobsa,et al.  The Adaptive Web, Methods and Strategies of Web Personalization , 2007, The Adaptive Web.

[25]  José Luis Vicedo González,et al.  TREC: Experiment and evaluation in information retrieval , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[26]  Karel Vredenburg,et al.  The state of user-centered design practice , 2005, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[27]  Dion Hinchcliffe,et al.  Web 2.0 Architectures , 2009 .

[28]  M. Sheelagh T. Carpendale,et al.  Evaluating Information Visualizations , 2008, Information Visualization.

[29]  Maiko Spiess.  Sorting Things Out - Classification and Its Consequences , 2010 .

[30]  Christine L. Borgman,et al.  Why are Online Catalogs Hard to Use? Lessons Learned from Information=Retrieval Studies , 1986 .

[31]  Hope A. Olson.  The Power to Name: Locating the Limits of Subject Representation in Libraries , 2002 .

[32]  Elizabeth Yakel,et al.  Creating the Next Generation of Archival Finding Aids , 2007, D Lib Mag..

[33]  Gary Marchionini,et al.  Information Seeking in Electronic Environments , 1995 .

[34]  Bertram C. Bruce,et al.  Theories and models of and for online learning , 2007, First Monday.

[35]  David M. Nichols,et al.  Browsing is a collaborative process , 1997, Inf. Process. Manag..

[36]  Alfred Kobsa,et al.  User Interfaces for All , 1999 .

[37]  Judy Kay,et al.  User Modeling for Adaptation , 2000 .

[38]  Stephanie Rosenbaum,et al.  A toolkit for strategic usability: results from workshops, panels, and surveys , 2000, CHI.

[39]  Catherine A. Johnson,et al.  Where Is the List with All the Names? Information-Seeking Behavior of Genealogists , 2007 .

[40]  Wendy Duff,et al.  Transforming the Crazy Quilt: Archival Displays from a User's Point of View , 1998 .

[41]  Michael Grüninger,et al.  Introduction , 2002, CACM.

[42]  Louis B. Rosenfeld,et al.  Information architecture for the world wide web - designing large-scale web sites , 1998 .

[43]  C. Benito.  Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) , 2003 .

[44]  Clay Redding.  Reengineering Finding Aids Revisited , 2002 .

[45]  Paul Solomon,et al.  Looking for Information—A Survey of Research on Information Seeking, Needs, and Behavior , 2003, Information Retrieval.

[46]  Elizabeth Yakel,et al.  Interaction in Virtual Archives: The Polar Bear Expedition Digital Collections Next Generation Finding Aid , 2008 .

[47]  Leanne Bowler,et al.  Designing Web portals in intergenerational teams: Two prototype portals for elementary school students , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[48]  Catherine Plaisant,et al.  The challenge of information visualization evaluation , 2004, AVI.

[49]  Susanne Bødker,et al.  Creating conditions for participation: Conflicts and resources in systems design , 1994 .

[50]  Batya Friedman,et al.  Human values and the design of computer technology , 1997 .

[51]  Christine L. Borgman,et al.  Why are online catalogs hard to use? Lessons learned from information-retrieval studies , 1986, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[52]  Susan T. Dumais,et al.  Personalizing Search via Automated Analysis of Interests and Activities , 2005, SIGIR.

[53]  Michael Lewis,et al.  Evaluating visualizations: using a taxonomic guide , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[54]  Leanne Bowler,et al.  Design-based research for LIS , 2008 .

[55]  Matthew Chalmers,et al.  Comparing Information Access Approaches , 1999, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[56]  Panayiotis Zaphiris,et al.  Advances in Universal Web Design and Evaluation: Research, Trends and Opportunities , 2006 .

[57]  Martin Bichler,et al.  Design science in information systems research , 2006, Wirtschaftsinf..

[58]  Olav W. Bertelsen,et al.  Critical computing : between sense and sensibility : proceedings of the Fourth Decennial Aarhus Conference, August 20-24, 2005, Aarhus, Denmark , 2005 .

[59]  Lawrence Lessig,et al.  Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace , 1999 .

[60]  William S. Cooper.  Is interindexer consistency a hobgoblin , 1969 .

[61]  Diane K. Kovacs.  The virtual reference handbook , 2013 .

[62]  M..  Stories and Names: Archival Description as Narrating Records and Constructing Meanings * , 2006 .

[63]  Alan Borning,et al.  Value Sensitive Design and Information Systems , 2020, The Ethics of Information Technologies.

[64]  Steven Johnson,et al.  Emergence: The Connected Lives of Ants, Brains, Cities, and Software , 2001 .

[65]  Diane K. Kovacs.  Virtual Reference Handbook: Interview and Information Delivery Techniques for the Chat and E-Mail Environments , 2007 .

[66]  S. Macdonald,et al.  The Politics of Display , 1998 .

[67]  Michael J. Muller,et al.  Participatory design , 1993, CACM.

[68]  Terry Cook,et al.  Archives And Justice: A South African Perspective , 2007 .

[69]  D. Grant Campbell,et al.  A PHENOMENOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK FOR THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE SEMANTIC WEB AND USER-CENTERED TAGGING SYSTEMS , 2006 .

[70]  Peter Ingwersen,et al.  The Turn - Integration of Information Seeking and Retrieval in Context , 2005, The Kluwer International Series on Information Retrieval.

[71]  Christopher J. Prom.  User interactions with electronic finding aids in a controlled setting , 2007 .

[72]  P. Zunde,et al.  Indexing Consistency and Quality. , 1969 .

[73]  Annamaria Galluzzi.  Perceptions of libraries and information resources: a report to the OCLC membership , 2007 .

[74]  Karen Markey,et al.  Catalog Use Studies--Since the Introduction of Online Interactive Catalogs: Impact on Design for Subject Access , 1983 .

[75]  Paul Conway.  Facts and Frameworks: An Approach to Studying the Users of Archives , 2010 .

[76]  Victoria L. Lemieux.  RADical Surgery: A Case Study in Using RAD to Produce a Thematic Guide , 1995 .

[77]  William Sims Bainbridge,et al.  Berkshire encyclopedia of human-computer interaction , 2004 .

[78]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[79]  Jo Bell Whitlatch,et al.  Professional competencies for reference and user services librarians , 2003 .

[80]  Pertti Vakkari,et al.  Editorial: Information seeking in context (ISIC) , 1999, Inf. Process. Manag..

[81]  Jean-Stéphen Piché.  Doing What's Possible with What We've Got: Using the World Wide Web to Integrate Archival , 2009 .

[82]  Darren Gergle,et al.  Designing Web Sites that Work: Usability for the Web , 2002 .

[83]  Regina Dunlea.  Mobile Web Best Practices 1.0 10/05 , 2005 .

[84]  Benjamin B. Bederson,et al.  A Study of Search Result Clustering Interfaces : Comparing Textual and Zoomable User Interfaces , 2003 .

[85]  Dennis F. Galletta,et al.  Human-Computer Interaction and Management Information Systems – Foundations , 2006 .

[86]  Joshua Porter.  Designing for the Social Web , 2008 .

[87]  Susanne Bødker,et al.  Creating Conditions for Participation: Conflicts and Resources in Systems Development , 1996, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[88]  David Ellis,et al.  A Behavioural Approach to Information Retrieval System Design , 1989, J. Documentation.

[89]  K. Markey.  Interindexer consistency tests: a literature review and report of a test of consistency in indexing visual materials , 1984 .

[90]  Allen Kent,et al.  Encyclopedia of Microcomputers , 1987 .

[91]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  The eyes have it: a task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations , 1996, Proceedings 1996 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages.

[92]  K. Eason.  Information Technology and Organizational Change , 1989 .

[93]  Paul B. Kantor,et al.  A study of information seeking and retrieving. II. Users, questions, and effectiveness , 1988, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[94]  Marcia J. Bates.  System meets user: Problems in matching subject search terms , 1977, Inf. Process. Manag..

[95]  Elizabeth Yakel.  LISTENING TO USERS , 2004 .

[96]  Marcia J. Bates,et al.  Subject access in online catalogs: A design model , 1986 .

[97]  E. Yakel,et al.  AI: Archival Intelligence and User Expertise , 2007 .

[98]  Paul B. Kantor,et al.  A study of information seeking and retrieving. III. Searchers, searches, and overlap , 1988, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[99]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Readings in information visualization - using vision to think , 1999 .

[100]  J. Preece,et al.  User-Centered Design , 2004 .

[101]  Richard J. Cox.  Machines in the archives: Technology and the coming transformation of archival reference , 2007, First Monday.

[102]  Gottfried Vossen,et al.  Unleashing Web 2.0: From concepts to creativity , 2007, UBIQ.

[103]  Patricia Carlson,et al.  Information Technology and Organizational Change , 1999, SIGDOC '99.

[104]  K. Järvelin,et al.  EVALUATING INFORMATION RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS UNDER THE CHALLENGES OF INTERACTION AND MULTIDIMENSIONAL DYNAMIC RELEVANCE , 2002 .

[105]  S. L. Star,et al.  Social informatics of digital library use and infrastructure , 1996 .

[106]  Allison Druin,et al.  Cooperative inquiry: developing new technologies for children with children , 1999, CHI '99.

[107]  Brandon Fuchs,et al.  User Studies , 2007 .

[108]  Peter Morville.  Ambient findability : Libraries at the crossroads of ubiquitous computing and the internet , 2005 .

[109]  Mary C. Dyson,et al.  Informing the Design of Web Interfaces to Museum Collections , 2000 .

[110]  Cyril Cleverdon,et al.  The Cranfield tests on index language devices , 1997 .

[111]  Geoffrey C. Bowker,et al.  Enacting silence: Residual categories as a challenge for ethics, information systems, and communication , 2007, Ethics and Information Technology.

[112]  BødkerSusanne.  Creating conditions for participation , 1996 .

[113]  Allison Druin,et al.  The Role of Children in the Design Technology , 1999 .

[114]  Colin Potts,et al.  Design of Everyday Things , 1988 .