Estimation of the Rigid-Body Motion From Three-Dimensional Images Using a Generalized Center-of-Mass Points Approach

We present an analytical method for the estimation of rigid-body motion in sets of three-dimensional (3-D) SPECT and PET slices. This method utilizes mathematically defined generalized center-of-mass points in images, requiring no segmentation. It can be applied to compensation of the rigid-body motion in both SPECT and PET, once a series of 3-D tomographic images are available. We generalized the formula for the center-of-mass to obtain a family of points comoving with the object's rigid-body motion. From the family of possible points we chose the best three points which resulted in the minimum root-mean-square difference between images as the generalized center-of-mass points for use in estimating motion. The estimated motion was used to sum the sets of tomographic images, or incorporated in the iterative reconstruction to correct for motion during reconstruction of the combined projection data. For comparison, the principle-axes method was also applied to estimate the rigid-body motion from the same tomographic images. To evaluate our method for different noise levels, we performed simulations with the MCAT phantom. We observed that though noise degraded the motion-detection accuracy, our method helped in reducing the motion artifact both visually and quantitatively. We also acquired four sets of the emission and transmission data of the Data Spectrum Anthropomorphic Phantom positioned at four different locations and/or orientations. From these we generated a composite acquisition simulating periodic phantom movements during acquisition. The simulated motion was calculated from the generalized center-of-mass points calculated from the tomographic images reconstructed from individual acquisitions. We determined that motion-compensation greatly reduced the motion artifact. Finally, in a simulation with the gated MCAT phantom, an exaggerated rigid-body motion was applied to the end-systolic frame. The motion was estimated from the end-diastolic and end-systolic images, and used to sum them into a summed image without obvious artifact. Compared to the principle-axes method, in two of the three comparisons with anthropomorphic phantom data our method estimated the motion in closer agreement to the Polaris system than the principal-axes method, while the principle-axes method gave a more accurate estimation of motion in most cases for the MCAT simulations. As an image-driven approach, our method assumes angularly complete data sets for each state of motion. We expect this method to be applied in correction of respiratory motion in respiratory gated SPECT, and respiratory or other rigid-body motion in PET

[1]  B F Hutton,et al.  Use of 3D reconstruction to correct for patient motion in SPECT. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  J. Cooper,et al.  Effect of patient motion on tomographic myocardial perfusion imaging. , 1992, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[3]  Michael A. King,et al.  Use of three-dimensional Gaussian interpolation in the projector/backprojector pair of iterative reconstruction for compensation of known rigid-body motion in SPECT , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[4]  Brian F. Hutton,et al.  Practical aspects of a data-driven motion correction approach for brain SPECT , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[5]  Michael A. King,et al.  Correction of organ motion in SPECT using reprojection data , 1995, 1995 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record.

[6]  John A. Orr,et al.  Applications of Tensor Theory to Object Recognition and Orientation Determination , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[7]  D C Barber,et al.  Use of forward projection to correct patient motion during SPECT imaging. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  K. S. Arun,et al.  Least-Squares Fitting of Two 3-D Point Sets , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[9]  Tracy L. Faber,et al.  Orientation of 3-D Structures in Medical Images , 1988, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[10]  E. Botvinick,et al.  A quantitative assessment of patient motion and its effect on myocardial perfusion SPECT images. , 1993, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[11]  R. Eisner,et al.  Quantitative analysis of the tomographic thallium-201 myocardial bullseye display: critical role of correcting for patient motion. , 1988, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[12]  J. F. Bradshaw,et al.  The principal axes transformation--a method for image registration. , 1990, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[13]  Roger Fulton,et al.  Correction for head movements in positron emission tomography using an optical motion tracking system , 2000 .

[14]  Y. Picard,et al.  Motion correction of PET images using multiple acquisition frames , 1995, 1995 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record.

[15]  G Germano,et al.  Quantitative assessment of motion artifacts and validation of a new motion-correction program for myocardial perfusion SPECT. , 2001, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[16]  Stefan Eberl,et al.  A practical 3D tomographic method for correcting patient head motion in clinical SPECT , 1998 .

[17]  W. Leslie,et al.  Comparison of motion correction algorithms for cardiac SPECT. , 1997, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[18]  Elliot R. McVeigh,et al.  Displacement and velocity of the coronary arteries: cardiac and respiratory motion , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[19]  B. Lopresti,et al.  Implementation and performance of an optical motion tracking system for high resolution brain PET imaging , 1998, 1998 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record. 1998 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (Cat. No.98CH36255).

[20]  Michael A. King,et al.  Determining patient 6-degrees-of-freedom motion from stereo infrared cameras during supine medical imaging , 2006, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[21]  P.H. Pretorius,et al.  Feasibility of stereo-infrared tracking to monitor patient motion during cardiac SPECT imaging , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[22]  S.-C. Huang,et al.  Capability evaluation of a sinogram error detection and correction method in computed tomography , 1991, Conference Record of the 1991 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference.

[23]  M. O’Connor,et al.  Comparison of four motion correction techniques in SPECT imaging of the heart: a cardiac phantom study. , 1998, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[24]  R.D. Beach,et al.  Motion correction for cardiac SPECT using a RBI-ML partial-reconstruction approach , 2004, IEEE Symposium Conference Record Nuclear Science 2004..

[25]  P.H. Pretorius,et al.  Correction of the respiratory motion of the heart by tracking of the center of mass of thresholded projections: a simulation study using the dynamic MCAT phantom , 2001, 2001 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (Cat. No.01CH37310).

[26]  D S Berman,et al.  Effect of motion on thallium-201 SPECT studies: a simulation and clinical study. , 1993, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[27]  M. King,et al.  A mathematical model of motion of the heart for use in generating source and attenuation maps for simulating emission imaging. , 1999, Medical physics.