A Pilot Study on Teleoperated Mobile Robots in Home Environments

Mobile robots operating in home environments must deal with constrained space and a great variety of obstacles and situations to handle. This article presents a pilot study aiming at identifying design specifications of a new user interface and robot specifications to improve efficiency and security for novice teleoperators of a mobile robot used in home environments. This pilot study is part of the familiarization phase of an iterative interdisciplinary design process aiming at outlining critical design and experimental issues before engaging into detailed design processes, elaborated experimental methodology and rigorous testing of the various capabilities of mobile robots for home care applications. We evaluated, with a small set of trained and untrained operators, two conceptually different user interfaces for teleoperated mobile robotic systems. These results demonstrate the challenges and the necessity of conducting trials in home environments to evaluate such teleoperated systems, and outline distinct preferences regarding robot capabilities, user interface navigation method and evaluation methodology

[1]  François Michaud,et al.  Code reusability tools for programming mobile robots , 2004, 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37566).

[2]  Phongchai Nilas,et al.  An agent-based architecture for an adaptive human-robot interface , 2003, 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[3]  G. Grisetti,et al.  The RoboCare project, cognitive systems for the care of the elderly , 2003 .

[4]  Ronald C. Arkin,et al.  Usability evaluation of high-level user assistance for robot mission specification , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).

[5]  Joelle Pineau,et al.  Pearl: A Mobile Robotic Assistant for the Elderly , 2002 .

[6]  Jean Scholtz,et al.  Common metrics for human-robot interaction , 2006, HRI '06.

[7]  K. Kinsella,et al.  Global aging : the challenge of success , 2005 .

[8]  Ian K. Bray,et al.  An Introduction to Requirements Engineering , 2002 .

[9]  Adam Jacoff,et al.  A Standard Test Course for Urban Search and Rescue Robots , 2000 .

[10]  Noriyuki Tejima,et al.  A safety strategy for rehabilitation robots , 2004 .

[11]  Christine M. Mitchell,et al.  Use of Model-Based Qualitative Icons and Adaptive Windows in Workstations for Supervisory Control Systems , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[12]  Robin R. Murphy,et al.  Human-robot interactions during the robot-assisted urban search and rescue response at the World Trade Center , 2003, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B.

[13]  Sebastian Thrun,et al.  Perspectives on standardization in mobile robot programming: the Carnegie Mellon Navigation (CARMEN) Toolkit , 2003, Proceedings 2003 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2003) (Cat. No.03CH37453).

[14]  Jean Scholtz,et al.  Evaluation of human-robot interaction awareness in search and rescue , 2004, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA '04. 2004.

[15]  Kazuhiko Kawamura,et al.  Evaluation of an enhanced human-robot interface , 2003, SMC'03 Conference Proceedings. 2003 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. Conference Theme - System Security and Assurance (Cat. No.03CH37483).

[16]  Julie A. Adams,et al.  Interface Evaluation for Mobile Robot Teleoperation , 2003 .

[17]  Michael A. Goodrich,et al.  Ecological displays for robot interaction: a new perspective , 2004, 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37566).

[18]  Dan R. Olsen,et al.  Metrics for Evaluating Human-Robot Interactions , 2003 .