Iterative Mechanisms for Electricity Markets

In order to deal with market power that sporadically results from contingencies (e.g., severe weather, plant outages) most electricity markets have institutions in charge of monitoring market performance and mitigating market power. The latter task is often achieved by producing estimates of marginal costs (also referred to as "reference levels") that may replace the actual bids by generators with market power. In this paper, we propose an iterative mechanism that constitutes an alternative to outright regulatory intervention in those sporadic situations in which market power is a significant concern. The iterative mechanism proposed is based upon relatively simple information exchange between the market maker and market participants and is equipped to handle general non-linear (convex) constraints related to technical and/or reliability requirements. We show the mechanism proposed has many desirable properties (approximately): incentive compatibility, efficiency, individual rationality and (weak) budget balance. In addition, we show it is robust to imperfect information regarding costs. To illustrate we consider its application to the joint clearing of day ahead dispatch and reserves, an approach that has been proposed for the large-scale integration of renewable generation. In this context, we relax the assumption that each generator has perfect information on its own expected marginal costs of adjustment and show the mechanism retains most of its properties.

[1]  Geoffrey Pritchard,et al.  A Single-Settlement, Energy-Only Electric Power Market for Unpredictable and Intermittent Participants , 2010, Oper. Res..

[2]  Tilman Börgers,et al.  An introduction to the theory of mechanism design , 2015 .

[3]  A.M. Stankovic,et al.  Applications of Ellipsoidal Approximations to Polyhedral Sets in Power System Optimization , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[4]  Jinye Zhao,et al.  Variable Resource Dispatch Through Do-Not-Exceed Limit , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[5]  J. Mcmillan Reinventing the Bazaar: A Natural History of Markets , 2002 .

[6]  E. Anderson,et al.  Mixed Strategies in Discriminatory Divisible-Good Auctions , 2010 .

[7]  Lawrence M. Ausubel An Efficient Ascending-Bid Auction for Multiple Objects , 2004 .

[8]  Krishnamurthy Dvijotham,et al.  Construction of power flow feasibility sets , 2015, ArXiv.

[9]  Theodore Groves,et al.  Incentives in Teams , 1973 .

[10]  J. Fuller,et al.  Pricing Energy and Reserves Using Stochastic Optimization in an Alternative Electricity Market , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[11]  Dirk Bergemann,et al.  Introduction to Symposium on Dynamic Contracts and Mechanism Design , 2015, J. Econ. Theory.

[12]  A. Conejo,et al.  Market-clearing with stochastic security-part I: formulation , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[13]  Hal R. Varian,et al.  Non-parametric analysis of optimizing behavior with measurement error , 1985 .

[14]  Arkadi Nemirovski,et al.  Robust solutions of Linear Programming problems contaminated with uncertain data , 2000, Math. Program..

[15]  Lawrence M. Ausubel,et al.  The Clock-Proxy Auction: A Practical Combinatorial Auction Design , 2004 .

[16]  D. Newbery,et al.  The Supply Function Equilibrium and its Policy Implications for Wholesale Electricity Auctions , 2009 .

[17]  Yurii Nesterov,et al.  Introductory Lectures on Convex Optimization - A Basic Course , 2014, Applied Optimization.

[18]  David Williams,et al.  Probability with Martingales , 1991, Cambridge mathematical textbooks.

[19]  I. Hiskens,et al.  Convexity of the set of feasible injections and revenue adequacy in FTR markets , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[20]  Xiang Li,et al.  Probabilistically Constrained Linear Programs and Risk-Adjusted Controller Design , 2005, SIAM J. Optim..

[21]  Alexander Shapiro,et al.  Convex Approximations of Chance Constrained Programs , 2006, SIAM J. Optim..

[22]  E. H. Clarke Multipart pricing of public goods , 1971 .