Transparent Handover for Mobile Multicast Sources

The Internet research community has proposed many routing protocols to support efficient multicast application. However, these protocols were developed for multicast parties whose members are topologically stationary, and they thus do not support both mobile receivers and mobile sources. Unfortunately, the mobility of the multicast source is a challenging problem to solve. When a multicast source moves from one IP network to another, it obtains a new IP address. However, since IP multicast is receiver-initiated, and the multicast delivery tree is constructed based on the multicast source’s address, the multicast traffic cannot be delivered to multicast receiver unless a new delivery tree is built. As a consequence, the multicast routing entities require new multicast routing states and multicast receivers need to be notified whenever the handover occurs. This induces a non-transparent mobility, and leads to session disruption. To overcome these drawbacks, this paper presents a new solution to make multicast source mobility transparent to both multicast receivers and on-tree multicast routers. This solution, called Mobility-aware Rendezvous Point, extends the PIM-SM Rendezvous Point with mobility awareness, and introduces new techniques for the source registration with the Rendezvous Point. Simulation results have proved that the solution avoids the reconstruction of a multicast tree after the handover of the multicast sources.

[1]  Olivier Bonaventure,et al.  Supporting Mobility in Multicast: A Compromise Between Large and Small Group Multicast , 2004, MIPS.

[2]  Alan O'Neill,et al.  Mobility Management and IP Multicast , 2002 .

[3]  Maria Ramalho,et al.  Intra- and inter-domain multicast routing protocols: A survey and taxonomy , 2000, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[4]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Mobility support in IPv6 , 1996, MobiCom '96.

[5]  Thomas Noël,et al.  Supporting mobile SSM sources for IPv6 , 2002, Global Telecommunications Conference, 2002. GLOBECOM '02. IEEE.

[6]  Abdelmadjid Bouabdallah,et al.  IP mobile multicast: Challenges and solutions , 2004, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[7]  Bill Fenner,et al.  Multicast Source Discovery Protocol (MSDP) , 2003, RFC.

[8]  Abdelmadjid Bouabdallah,et al.  Multicast receiver and sender access control and its applicability to mobile IP environments: a survey , 2005, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[9]  Abdelmadjid Bouabdallah,et al.  Mobility-Aware Rendezvous Point for Mobile Multicast Sources , 2004, WWIC.

[10]  Thomas C. Schmidt,et al.  Performance Analysis of Multicast Mobility in a Hierarchical Mobile IP Proxy Environment , 2004, TERENA Networking Conference.

[11]  Kevin C. Almeroth,et al.  Deployment Complexity Versus Performance Efficiency in Mobile Multicast , 2004 .

[12]  Fan Rui,et al.  ScaleMoM: a mobile multicast scheme and its performance analysis , 2001, 2001 International Conferences on Info-Tech and Info-Net. Proceedings (Cat. No.01EX479).

[13]  Dharma P. Agrawal,et al.  A framework for handling multicast source movement over mobile IP , 2002, 2002 IEEE International Conference on Communications. Conference Proceedings. ICC 2002 (Cat. No.02CH37333).

[14]  Stephen E. Deering,et al.  Host extensions for IP multicasting , 1986, RFC.