Classification images for detection and position discrimination in the fovea and parafovea.

Classification images provide an important new method for learning about which parts of the stimulus are used to make perceptual decisions and provide a new tool for measuring the template an observer uses to accomplish a task. Here we introduce a new method using one-dimensional sums of sinusoids as both test stimuli (discrete frequency patterns [DFP]) and as noise. We use this method to study and compare the templates used to detect a target and to discriminate the target's position in central and parafoveal vision. Our results show that, unsurprisingly, the classification images for detection in both foveal and parafoveal vision resemble the DFP test stimulus, but are considerably broader in spatial frequency tuning than the ideal observer. In contrast, the classification images for foveal position discrimination are not ideal, and depend on the size of the position offset. Over a range of offsets from close to threshold to about 90 arc sec, our observers appear to use a peak strategy (responding to the location of the peak of the luminance profile of the target plus noise). Position acuity is much less acute in the parafovea, and this is reflected in the reduced root efficiency (i.e., square root of efficiency) and the coarse classification images for peripheral position discrimination. The peripheral position template is a low spatial frequency template.

[1]  S. Klein,et al.  Vernier acuity, crowding and cortical magnification , 1985, Vision Research.

[2]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Efficiency of human visual signal discrimination. , 1981, Science.

[3]  ROBERT F. HESS,et al.  Primitives Used in the Spatial Localization of Nonabutting Stimuli: Peaks or Centroids , 1996, Vision Research.

[4]  Bettina L. Beard,et al.  Vernier Acuity with Non-simultaneous Targets: The Cortical Magnification Factor Estimated by Psychophysics , 1997, Vision Research.

[5]  S. Kosslyn Seeing and Imagining in the Cerebral Hemispheres: A Computational Approach , 1988 .

[6]  R. Watt,et al.  Spatial filters and the localization of luminance changes in human vision , 1984, Vision Research.

[7]  Thom Carney,et al.  Can sinusoidal vernier acuity be predicted by contrast discrimination? , 1993, Vision Research.

[8]  D G Pelli,et al.  Close Encounters--An Artist Shows that Size Affects Shape , 1999, Science.

[9]  P. Bennett,et al.  Deriving behavioural receptive fields for visually completed contours , 2000, Current Biology.

[10]  C Blakemore,et al.  On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  S. Klein,et al.  Spatial frequency channels in human vision as asymmetric (edge) mechanisms. , 1974, Vision research.

[12]  G Westheimer,et al.  Editorial: Visual acuity and hyperacuity. , 1975, Investigative ophthalmology.

[13]  S. Klein,et al.  Resolution Acuity is better than Vernier Acuity , 1997, Vision Research.

[14]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  Unmasking the mechanisms for Vernier acuity: evidence for a template model for Vernier acuity , 2000, Vision Research.

[15]  G. Legge,et al.  Contrast discrimination in noise. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[16]  G. Westheimer The spatial grain of the perifoveal visual field , 1982, Vision Research.

[17]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  Spatial scale shifts in peripheral vernier acuity , 1994, Vision Research.

[18]  Paul V. McGraw,et al.  Alignment of separated patches: multiple location tags , 1999, Vision Research.

[19]  A Burgess,et al.  Visual signal detection. III. On Bayesian use of prior knowledge and cross correlation. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[20]  J. Hellige,et al.  Categorical versus Coordinate Spatial Processing: Effects of Blurring and Hemispheric Asymmetry , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[21]  Albert J. Ahumada,et al.  Technique to extract relevant image features for visual tasks , 1998, Electronic Imaging.

[22]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  Discrimination of position and contrast in amblyopic and peripheral vision , 1994, Vision Research.

[23]  Paul V McGraw,et al.  Vernier and contrast discrimination in central and peripheral vision , 2000, Vision Research.

[24]  B Julesz,et al.  Masking in Visual Recognition: Effects of Two-Dimensional Filtered Noise , 1973, Science.