Resolving the redundancy of a seven DOF wearable robotic system based on kinematic and dynamic constraint

According to the seven degrees of freedom (DOFs) human arm model composed of the shoulder, elbow, and wrist joints, positioning of the wrist in space and orientating the palm is a task requiring only six DOFs. Due to this redundancy, a given task can be completed by multiple arm configurations, and there is no unique mathematical solution to the inverse kinematics. The redundancy of a wearable robotic system (exoskeleton) that interacts with the human is expected to be resolved in the same way as that of the human arm. A unique solution to the system's redundancy was introduced by combining both kinematic and dynamic criteria. The redundancy of the arm is expressed mathematically by defining the swivel angle: the rotation angle of the plane including the upper and lower arm around a virtual axis connecting the shoulder and wrist joints which are fixed in space. Two different swivel angles were generated based on kinematic and dynamic constraints. The kinematic criterion is to maximize the projection of the longest principle axis of the manipulability ellipsoid for the human arm on the vector connecting the wrist and the virtual target on the head region. The dynamic criterion is to minimize the mechanical work done in the joint space for each two consecutive points along the task space trajectory. These two criteria were then combined linearly with different weight factors for estimating the swivel angle. Post processing of experimental data collected with a motion capturing system indicated that by using the proposed synthesis of redundancy resolution criteria, the error between the predicted swivel angle and the actual swivel angle adopted by the motor control system was less then five degrees. This result outperformed the prediction based on a single criteria.

[1]  Marjan A Admiraal,et al.  Modeling kinematics and dynamics of human arm movements. , 2004, Motor control.

[2]  Robert Riener,et al.  ARMin - Exoskeleton Robot for Stroke Rehabilitation , 2009 .

[3]  M. Kawato,et al.  Formation and control of optimal trajectory in human multijoint arm movement , 1989, Biological Cybernetics.

[4]  Thomas R. Kane,et al.  THEORY AND APPLICATIONS , 1984 .

[5]  Moshe Brand,et al.  Redundancy resolution of a human arm for controlling a seven DOF wearable robotic system , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[6]  Jiping He,et al.  Determining natural arm configuration along a reaching trajectory , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[7]  Hermano I Krebs,et al.  Rehabilitation robotics: pilot trial of a spatial extension for MIT-Manus , 2004, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[8]  Jacob Rosen,et al.  Comparison of multi-sensor admittance control in joint space and task space for a seven degree of freedom upper limb exoskeleton , 2010, 2010 3rd IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics.

[9]  P. Strick,et al.  Motor Areas in the Frontal Lobe: The Anatomical Substrate for the Central Control of Movement , 2004 .

[10]  E. J. Vrijenhoek,et al.  Arm position constraints during pointing and reaching in 3-D space. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  M. Graziano,et al.  Complex Movements Evoked by Microstimulation of Precentral Cortex , 2002, Neuron.

[12]  J.C. Perry,et al.  Design of a 7 Degree-of-Freedom Upper-Limb Powered Exoskeleton , 2006, The First IEEE/RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, 2006. BioRob 2006..

[13]  John T. McConville,et al.  INVESTIGATION OF INERTIAL PROPERTIES OF THE HUMAN BODY , 1975 .

[14]  Norman I. Badler,et al.  Strength guided motion , 1990, SIGGRAPH.

[15]  Anthony A. Maciejewski,et al.  Dealing with the ill-conditioned equations of motion for articulated figures , 1990, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[16]  Stan Gielen,et al.  Review of models for the generation of multi-joint movements in 3-D. , 2009, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[17]  Norman I. Badler,et al.  Real-Time Inverse Kinematics Techniques for Anthropomorphic Limbs , 2000, Graph. Model..

[18]  J.C. Perry,et al.  Upper-Limb Powered Exoskeleton Design , 2007, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[19]  Samuel R. Buss,et al.  Selectively Damped Least Squares for Inverse Kinematics , 2005, J. Graph. Tools.

[20]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Coordination of arm and wrist motion during a reaching task , 1982, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[21]  Norman I. Badler,et al.  Real-Time Inverse Kinematics of the Human Arm , 1996, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[22]  T. Kang,et al.  Determining natural arm configuration along reaching trajectory , 2003, Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37439).

[23]  John J. Craig,et al.  Introduction to Robotics Mechanics and Control , 1986 .

[24]  C. Prablanc,et al.  Postural invariance in three-dimensional reaching and grasping movements , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.