Different coding strategies for the perception of stable and changeable facial attributes

Perceptual systems face competing requirements: improving signal-to-noise ratios of noisy images, by integration; and maximising sensitivity to change, by differentiation. Both processes occur in human vision, under different circumstances: they have been termed priming, or serial dependencies, leading to positive sequential effects; and adaptation or habituation, which leads to negative sequential effects. We reasoned that for stable attributes, such as the identity and gender of faces, the system should integrate: while for changeable attributes like facial expression, it should also engage contrast mechanisms to maximise sensitivity to change. Subjects viewed a sequence of images varying simultaneously in gender and expression, and scored each as male or female, and happy or sad. We found strong and consistent positive serial dependencies for gender, and negative dependency for expression, showing that both processes can operate at the same time, on the same stimuli, depending on the attribute being judged. The results point to highly sophisticated mechanisms for optimizing use of past information, either by integration or differentiation, depending on the permanence of that attribute.

[1]  D. Burr,et al.  A Visual Sense of Number , 2007, Current Biology.

[2]  G. Campana,et al.  Where perception meets memory: A review of repetition priming in visual search tasks , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[3]  D. P. Gallogly,et al.  Direction biasing by brief apparent motion stimuli , 2000, Vision Research.

[4]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Fitting the Mind to the World: Adaptation and after-effects in high-level vision , 2005 .

[5]  Sergei Gepshtein,et al.  Sensory adaptation as optimal resource allocation , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Predictive coding under the free-energy principle , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[7]  A. O'Toole,et al.  Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[8]  R. Dolan,et al.  fMRI-adaptation reveals dissociable neural representations of identity and expression in face perception. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  D. Whitney,et al.  Serial Dependence in the Perception of Faces , 2014, Current Biology.

[10]  A. Young,et al.  Understanding face recognition. , 1986, British journal of psychology.

[11]  D. Alais,et al.  Love at second sight: Sequential dependence of facial attractiveness in an on-line dating paradigm , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[12]  A. Borst Seeing smells: imaging olfactory learning in bees , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[13]  Bernard Tiddeman,et al.  Towards Realism in Facial Image Transformation: Results of a Wavelet MRF Method , 2005, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[14]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  Visual inertia in apparent motion , 1987, Vision Research.

[15]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  Perceptual manifestations of fast neural plasticity: Motion priming, rapid motion aftereffect and perceptual sensitization , 2005, Vision Research.

[16]  A. Young,et al.  Repetition priming of face recognition , 1987, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[17]  J. Tanaka,et al.  The NimStim set of facial expressions: Judgments from untrained research participants , 2009, Psychiatry Research.

[18]  A. Little,et al.  Category contingent aftereffects for faces of different races, ages and species , 2008, Cognition.

[19]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[20]  D. Knill,et al.  The Bayesian brain: the role of uncertainty in neural coding and computation , 2004, Trends in Neurosciences.

[21]  P. Ekman Emotions revealed , 2004, BMJ.

[22]  D. Whitney,et al.  Serial dependence in visual perception , 2011 .

[23]  Richard Durbin,et al.  The computing neuron , 1989 .

[24]  Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al.  Probabilistic Models of the Brain: Perception and Neural Function , 2002 .

[25]  R. Addams LI. An account of a peculiar optical phænomenon seen after having looked at a moving body , 1834 .

[26]  A. Young,et al.  Face perception after brain injury. Selective impairments affecting identity and expression. , 1993, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[27]  A. Young,et al.  Understanding the recognition of facial identity and facial expression , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[28]  Christopher J. Fox,et al.  What is adapted in face adaptation? The neural representations of expression in the human visual system , 2007, Brain Research.

[29]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Priming of pop-out: II. The role of position , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[30]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Orientation-Contingent Face Aftereffects and Implications for Face-Coding Mechanisms , 2004, Current Biology.

[31]  J. Haxby,et al.  The distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[32]  Linda Jeffery,et al.  How distinct is the coding of face identity and expression? Evidence for some common dimensions in face space , 2015, Cognition.

[33]  Tatsuto Takeuchi,et al.  Visual motion priming reveals why motion perception deteriorates during mesopic vision. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[34]  J. Gibson Adaptation, after-effect, and contrast in the perception of tilted lines. II. Simultaneous contrast and the areal restriction of the after-effect. , 1937 .

[35]  D. Burr,et al.  Compressive mapping of number to space reflects dynamic encoding mechanisms, not static logarithmic transform , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  A. Yuille,et al.  Object perception as Bayesian inference. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.