A sensitive and reliable locomotor rating scale for open field testing in rats.

Behavioral assessment after spinal cord contusion has long focused on open field locomotion using modifications of a rating scale developed by Tarlov and Klinger (1954). However, on-going modifications by several groups have made interlaboratory comparison of locomotor outcome measures difficult. The purpose of the present study was to develop an efficient, expanded, and unambiguous locomotor rating scale to standardize locomotor outcome measures across laboratories. Adult rats (n = 85) were contused at T7-9 cord level with an electromagnetic or weight drop device. Locomotor behavior was evaluated before injury, on the first or second postoperative day, and then for up to 10 weeks. Scoring categories and attributes were identified, operationally defined, and ranked based on the observed sequence of locomotor recovery patterns. These categories formed the Basso, Beattie, Bresnahan (BBB) Locomotor Rating Scale. The data indicate that the BBB scale is a valid and predictive measure of locomotor recovery able to distinguish behavioral outcomes due to different injuries and to predict anatomical alterations at the lesion center. Interrater reliability tests indicate that examiners with widely varying behavioral testing experience can apply the scale consistently and obtain similar scores. The BBB Locomotor Rating Scale offers investigators a more discriminating measure of behavioral outcome to evaluate treatments after spinal cord injury.

[1]  B T Stokes,et al.  An electromechanical spinal injury technique with dynamic sensitivity. , 1992, Journal of neurotrauma.

[2]  M. Beattie,et al.  Spinal cord injury produced by consistent mechanical displacement of the cord in rats: behavioral and histologic analysis. , 1992, Journal of neurotrauma.

[3]  M. Beattie,et al.  A Comparison of YM-14673, U-50488H, and Nalmefene after Spinal Cord Injury in the Rat , 1993, Experimental Neurology.

[4]  S. Rossignol,et al.  Recovery of locomotion after chronic spinalization in the adult cat , 1987, Brain Research.

[5]  C. Hsu Criteria for valid preclinical trials. , 1992, Journal of neurotrauma.

[6]  J. A. Gruner,et al.  A monitored contusion model of spinal cord injury in the rat. , 1992, Journal of neurotrauma.

[7]  M. Tuszynski,et al.  Fibroblasts Genetically Modified to Produce Nerve Growth Factor Induce Robust Neuritic Ingrowth after Grafting to the Spinal Cord , 1994, Experimental Neurology.

[8]  W. Young,et al.  The effects of methylprednisolone and the ganglioside GM1 on acute spinal cord injury in rats. , 1994, Journal of neurosurgery.

[9]  M. Beattie,et al.  A behavioral and anatomical analysis of spinal cord injury produced by a feedback-controlled impaction device , 1987, Experimental Neurology.

[10]  P. Perot,et al.  Therapeutic model for experimental spinal cord injury in the rat: I. Mortality and motor deficit. , 1987, Central nervous system trauma : journal of the American Paralysis Association.

[11]  C. Vierck,et al.  Criteria for assessing recovery of function after spinal cord injury: Behavioral methods , 1990, Experimental Neurology.

[12]  S. Rossignol,et al.  The locomotion of the low spinal cat. II. Interlimb coordination. , 1980, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[13]  H. Dai,et al.  Recovery of function after spinal cord hemisection in newborn and adult rats: Differential effects on reflex and locomotor function , 1992, Experimental Neurology.

[14]  M. Murray,et al.  Restitution of function and collateral sprouting in the cat spinal cord: The partially hemisected animal , 1974, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[15]  Karen Gale,et al.  Spinal cord contusion in the rat: Behavioral analysis of functional neurologic impairment , 1985, Experimental Neurology.

[16]  A. Faden,et al.  Dynorphin‐related peptides cause motor dysfunction in the rat through a non‐opiate action , 1984, British journal of pharmacology.

[17]  I M TARLOV,et al.  Spinal cord compression studies. II. Time limits for recovery after acute compression in dogs. , 1954, A.M.A. archives of neurology and psychiatry.

[18]  A. Faden,et al.  Dynorphin induces partially reversible paraplegia in the rat. , 1983, European journal of pharmacology.

[19]  D. Stelzner,et al.  Do propriospinal projections contribute to hindlimb recovery when all long tracts are cut in neonatal or weanling rats? , 1991, Experimental Neurology.