Crossover interference underlies sex differences in recombination rates.

In many organisms, recombination rates differ between the two sexes. Here we show that in mice, this is because of a shorter genomic interference distance in females than in males, measured in Mb. However, the interference distance is the same in terms of bivalent length. We propose a model in which the interference distance in the two sexes reflects the compaction of chromosomes at the pachytene stage of meiosis.

[1]  G. Roeder,et al.  Crossover interference is abolished in the absence of a synaptonemal complex protein , 1994, Cell.

[2]  Mark A McPeek,et al.  Estimating metazoan divergence times with a molecular clock. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  M. Daly,et al.  A genetic linkage map of the human genome , 1987, Cell.

[4]  B. Leadbeater.  Life-history and ultrastructure of a new marine species of Proterospongia (Choanoflagellida) , 1983, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.

[5]  L. Hurst,et al.  Imprinted chromosomal regions of the human genome have unusually high recombination rates. , 2003, Genetics.

[6]  E. Marcon,et al.  Initiation and resolution of interhomolog connections: crossover and non-crossover sites along mouse synaptonemal complexes , 2007, Journal of Cell Science.

[7]  J C Murray,et al.  Pediatrics and , 1998 .

[8]  N. King,et al.  The unicellular ancestry of animal development. , 2004, Developmental cell.

[9]  C. Grey,et al.  Crossover and noncrossover pathways in mouse meiosis. , 2005, Molecular cell.

[10]  D. Hibberd.  Observations on the ultrastructure of the choanoflagellate Codosiga botrytis (Ehr.) Saville-Kent with special reference to the flagellar apparatus. , 1975, Journal of cell science.

[11]  Karl W Broman,et al.  Crossover interference in the mouse. , 2002, Genetics.

[12]  F. Delsuc,et al.  The timing of eukaryotic evolution: does a relaxed molecular clock reconcile proteins and fossils? , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  C. Sapienza,et al.  X chromosome effect on maternal recombination and meiotic drive in the mouse. , 2002, Genetics.

[14]  T. Speed,et al.  Statistical analysis of crossover interference using the chi-square model. , 1995, Genetics.

[15]  E. Feingold,et al.  Estimating the Frequency Distribution of Crossovers during Meiosis from Recombination Data , 2001, Biometrics.

[16]  Nancy Kleckner,et al.  A mechanical basis for chromosome function. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  C. Heyting,et al.  Two levels of interference in mouse meiotic recombination. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  T. Gojobori,et al.  Recombinational hotspot specific to female meiosis in the mouse major histocompatibility complex , 2004, Immunogenetics.

[19]  D. D. de Rooij,et al.  SYCE2 is required for synaptonemal complex assembly, double strand break repair, and homologous recombination , 2007, The Journal of cell biology.

[20]  E. Davidson,et al.  Gene Regulatory Networks and the Evolution of Animal Body Plans , 2006, Science.

[21]  P. Ross-Macdonald,et al.  The budding yeast Msh4 protein functions in chromosome synapsis and the regulation of crossover distribution. , 2001, Genetics.

[22]  M. Hultén,et al.  Inter-sex variation in synaptonemal complex lengths largely determine the different recombination rates in male and female germ cells , 2004, Cytogenetic and Genome Research.

[23]  A. Sturtevant,et al.  The behavior of the chromosomes as studied through linkage , 1915, Zeitschrift für induktive Abstammungs- und Vererbungslehre.

[24]  M. Martindale.  The evolution of metazoan axial properties , 2005, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[25]  S. Leys,et al.  Gastrulation in Calcareous Sponges: In Search of Haeckel's Gastraea1 , 2005, Integrative and comparative biology.

[26]  R. Hawley,et al.  Homologous chromosome interactions in meiosis: diversity amidst conservation , 2005, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[27]  Ravi Sachidanandam,et al.  A germline-specific class of small RNAs binds mammalian Piwi proteins , 2006, Nature.

[28]  R. Kolodner,et al.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mer3 Is a DNA Helicase Involved in Meiotic Crossing Over , 2002, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[29]  M. Lyon,et al.  Genetic variants and strains of the laboratory mouse , 1989 .

[30]  Yueming Ding,et al.  An efficient SNP system for mouse genome scanning and elucidating strain relationships. , 2004, Genome research.

[31]  C. Moorehead.  All rights reserved , 1997 .

[32]  C. Marshall.  Explaining the Cambrian "Explosion" of Animals , 2006 .

[33]  D. Hamer,et al.  High-throughput SNP genotyping by allele-specific PCR with universal energy-transfer-labeled primers. , 2001, Genome research.

[34]  J. Dutheil,et al.  Recombination Difference between Sexes: A Role for Haploid Selection , 2005, PLoS biology.

[35]  G. Hannon,et al.  MIWI2 is essential for spermatogenesis and repression of transposons in the mouse male germline. , 2007, Developmental cell.

[36]  J. Wienberg,et al.  Male mouse recombination maps for each autosome identified by chromosome painting. , 2002, American journal of human genetics.

[37]  T P Speed,et al.  Modeling interference in genetic recombination. , 1995, Genetics.

[38]  S. Baldauf,et al.  The protistan origins of animals and fungi. , 2006, Molecular biology and evolution.

[39]  K. Peterson,et al.  Origin of the Eumetazoa: testing ecological predictions of molecular clocks against the Proterozoic fossil record. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  C. Heyting,et al.  Meiotic interference among MLH1 foci requires neither an intact axial element structure nor full synapsis , 2007, Journal of Cell Science.

[41]  C. Heyting,et al.  Mouse Sycp1 functions in synaptonemal complex assembly, meiotic recombination, and XY body formation. , 2005, Genes & development.

[42]  H. C. Whisler.  Developmental control of Amoebidium parasiticum. , 1968, Developmental biology.

[43]  S. Leys,et al.  Embryogenesis and larval differentiation in sponges , 2006 .

[44]  A. Shinohara,et al.  Crossover interference in Saccharomyces cerevisiae requires a TID1/RDH54- and DMC1-dependent pathway. , 2003, Genetics.