The Functional Anatomy of Sound Intensity Discrimination

The human neuroanatomical substrate of sound intensity discrimination was investigated by combining psychoacoustics and functional neuroimaging. Seven normal subjects were trained to detect deviant sounds presented with a slightly higher intensity than a standard harmonic sound, using a Go/No Go paradigm. Individual psychometric curves were carefully assessed using a three-step psychoacoustic procedure. Subjects were scanned while passively listening to the standard sound and while discriminating changes in sound intensity at four different performance levels (d′ = 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, and 4.5). Analysis of regional cerebral blood flow data outlined activation, during the discrimination conditions, of a right hemispheric frontoparietal network already reported in other studies of selective or sustained attention to sensory input, and in which activity appeared inversely proportional to intensity discriminability. Conversely, a right posterior temporal region included in secondary auditory cortex was activated during discrimination of sound intensity independently of performance level. These findings suggest that discrimination of sound intensity involves two different cortical networks: a supramodal right frontoparietal network responsible for allocation of sensory attentional resources, and a region of secondary auditory cortex specifically involved in sensory computation of sound intensity differences.

[1]  Shihab A. Shamma,et al.  Auditory cortex , 1998 .

[2]  Y. Samson,et al.  Lateralization of Speech and Auditory Temporal Processing , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[3]  D. Irvine,et al.  The posterior field P of cat auditory cortex: coding of envelope transients. , 1998, Cerebral cortex.

[4]  R. Zatorre,et al.  Constraints on the selection of auditory information. , 1998 .

[5]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Left‐hemisphere specialization for the processing of acoustic transients , 1997, Neuroreport.

[6]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Time-Related Changes in Neural Systems Underlying Attention and Arousal During the Performance of an Auditory Vigilance Task , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[7]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  The structural components of music perception. A functional anatomical study. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[8]  T. Paus Location and function of the human frontal eye-field: A selective review , 1996, Neuropsychologia.

[9]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Functional imaging of human right hemispheric activation for exploratory movements , 1996, Annals of neurology.

[10]  M. E. Raichle,et al.  PET Studies of Auditory and Phonological Processing: Effects of Stimulus Characteristics and Task Demands , 1995, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[11]  F. Perrin,et al.  Separate Representation of Stimulus Frequency, Intensity, and Duration in Auditory Sensory Memory: An Event-Related Potential and Dipole-Model Analysis , 1995, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[12]  R S Frackowiak,et al.  A PET study of cognitive strategies in normal subjects during language tasks. Influence of phonetic ambiguity and sequence processing on phoneme monitoring. , 1994, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[13]  J. Binder,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging of human auditory cortex , 1994, Annals of neurology.

[14]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  The anatomy of phonological and semantic processing in normal subjects. , 1992, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[15]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Lateralization of phonetic and pitch discrimination in speech processing. , 1992, Science.

[16]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .

[17]  M. Raichle,et al.  Localization of a human system for sustained attention by positron emission tomography , 1991, Nature.

[18]  R. Näätänen The role of attention in auditory information processing as revealed by event-related potentials and other brain measures of cognitive function , 1990, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[19]  Günter Ehret,et al.  Complex sound analysis (frequency resolution, filtering and spectral integration) by single units of the inferior colliculus of the cat , 1988, Brain Research Reviews.

[20]  T. Shallice,et al.  Frontal lesions and sustained attention , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[21]  D L Woods,et al.  Electrophysiologic evidence of increased distractibility after dorsolateral prefrontal lesions , 1986, Neurology.

[22]  M. Mintun,et al.  A Noninvasive Approach to Quantitative Functional Brain Mapping with H215O and Positron Emission Tomography , 1984, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[23]  J. Kulikowski,et al.  Neurotoxic effects of acrylamide on rat retinogeniculate fibres , 1984, Behavioural Brain Research.

[24]  D. Knopman,et al.  Regional cerebral blood flow correlates of auditory processing. , 1982, Archives of neurology.

[25]  M. Mesulam A cortical network for directed attention and unilateral neglect , 1981, Annals of neurology.

[26]  H. Levitt Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  PET studies of phonetic processing of speech: review, replication, and reanalysis. , 1996, Cerebral cortex.

[28]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Spatial registration and normalization of images , 1995 .

[29]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach , 1994 .

[30]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .