Camera-trap studies of maned wolf density in the Cerrado and the Pantanal of Brazil

The maned wolf (Chrysocyon brachyurus) is threatened by large-scale habitat loss, in particular due to conversion to agricultural land. This is the first published study on maned wolf density and the first test of individual identification from camera-trap photographs. We present results from two Brazilian regions: the Cerrado and the Pantanal. Using capture–recapture analysis of camera-trap data, we estimated densities per 100 square kilometers of 3.64 ± 0.77 individuals at the Cerrado site and 1.56 ± 0.77 individuals at the Pantanal site. Parallel radio-telemetry studies at the Pantanal site showed that maned wolves occupied home ranges of 39–58 km2 (mean = 50.3 ± 7.67 km2). Our study in the Cerrado took place in a private farm with a mixture of agricultural land and native habitats, representative of the majority of the present-day Cerrado. Whereas many other mammalian species have suffered in the region, our results show that the maned wolf may cope better with this highly fragmented landscape than one might have feared. Finally, the paper briefly compares maned wolf density with density of puma (Puma concolor) in the Pantanal site.

[1]  A. Noss,et al.  How Small is too Small? Camera Trap Survey Areas and Density Estimates for Ocelots in the Bolivian Chaco , 2007 .

[2]  K..  ESTIMATING TIGER Panthera tigris POPULATIONS FROM CAMERA-TRAP DATA USING CAPTURE RECAPTURE MODELS , 2022 .

[3]  Marc Kéry,et al.  ESTIMATION OF OCELOT DENSITY IN THE PANTANAL USING CAPTURE–RECAPTURE ANALYSIS OF CAMERA-TRAPPING DATA , 2003 .

[4]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Users Manual for Program CAPTURE , 1978 .

[5]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Small-mammal density estimation: A field comparison of grid-based vs. web-based density estimators , 2003 .

[6]  James G. Sanderson,et al.  Monitoring Elusive Mammals , 2005 .

[7]  J. A. Ratter,et al.  The Brazilian Cerrado Vegetation and Threats to its Biodiversity , 1997 .

[8]  M. Trolle.  Mammal survey in the southeastern Pantanal, Brazil , 2003, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[9]  Marc Kéry,et al.  Camera-trap study of ocelot and other secretive mammals in the northern Pantanal , 2005 .

[10]  Wesley Rodrigues da Silva,et al.  Biologia e conservação do lobo-guara na Estação Ecologica de Aguas Emendadas, DF , 2002 .

[11]  E. Cuéllar,et al.  A Camera Trapping and Radio Telemetry Study of Lowland Tapir ( Tapirus terrestris ) in Bolivian Dry Forests , 2003 .

[12]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Evaluation of Two Density Estimators of Small Mammal Population Size , 1985 .

[13]  J. Dietz.  Ecology and social organization of the maned wolf (Chrysocyon brachyurus) , 1984 .

[14]  C. T. D. Carvalho,et al.  Disease, food and reproduction of the maned wolf: Chrysocyon Brachyurus (Illiger) (Carnivora, Canidae) in southeast Brazil , 1995 .

[15]  Andrew J. Noss,et al.  Camera trapping Priodontes maximus in the dry forests of Santa Cruz, Bolivia. , 2004 .

[16]  J. Nichols,et al.  ESTIMATION OF TIGER DENSITIES IN INDIA USING PHOTOGRAPHIC CAPTURES AND RECAPTURES , 1998 .

[17]  D. Macdonald,et al.  Canids : foxes, wolves, jackals and dogs : status survey and conservation action plan , 2004 .

[18]  Andrew J. Noss,et al.  The use of camera traps for estimating jaguar Panthera onca abundance and density using capture/recapture analysis , 2004, Oryx.

[19]  R. Mittermeier,et al.  Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities , 2000, Nature.

[20]  Andrew J. Noss,et al.  One thousand jaguars ( Panthera onca ) in Bolivia's Chaco? Camera trapping in the Kaa-Iya National Park , 2004 .

[21]  C. O. Mohr,et al.  Table of equivalent populations of North American small mammals , 1947 .