Factors influencing grapevine vigour and the potential for control with partial rootzone drying

Maintaining the most cost‐effective balance between vegetative and reproductive growth is one of the most testing problems in modern viticulture. Grapevines which exhibit excessive vegetative vigour are likely to produce less fruit of reduced quality, and vines with inadequate vigour may be compromised in terms of their yield potential. The requirement for techniques to better manage excess vigour has become more acute in recent years with the increased use of irrigation, adoption of vigour‐imparting rootstocks and the expansion of vineyards into cooler geographic regions. A number of strategies may be used to control vine vigour. Chemical growth regulators, although capable of reducing shoot vigour, have never received acceptance due to undesirable side effects and concerns over chemical residues. Devigorating rootstocks, likewise, may have the potential to control vigour but none are in wide commercial use. Restriction of the effective root volume, achieved through manipulation of planting densities, competition by cover crops, regulation of the soil volume wetted by drip irrigation or regulation of water availability can all achieve a degree of devigoration but often at the expense of fruit yield. Manipulation of vines through pruning and trellis design are probably the most commonly used methods for the control of shoot vigour. A high number of nodes retained at pruning combined with trellises which allow open canopies have proved successful. Advances in the understanding of the physiological factors influencing shoot growth and transpiration have allowed the development of novel irrigation methods for the control of vine vigour. These techniques exploit the fact that chemical signals originating in the roots are primarily responsible for the control of shoot growth and transpiration. Stimulation of the production of these signals through partial drying of the root system results in a significant reduction in shoot growth and water‐use while maintaining crop yield and improving fruit quality. These new techniques, in combination with appropriate pruning and trellising methods, are providing new viticultural tools for controlling vine vigour and water‐use efficiency.

[1]  W. Davies,et al.  Chemical regulation of gas exchange and growth of plants in drying soil in the field , 1996 .

[2]  C. Vazzana,et al.  Control of crops leaf growth by chemical and hydraulic influences , 1996 .

[3]  D. Turner,et al.  Short term drying of half the root system reduces growth but not water status or photosynthesis in leaves of passionfruit (Passiflora sp.) , 1996 .

[4]  Jianhua Zhang,et al.  Exudation rate and hydraulic conductivity of maize roots are enhanced by soil drying and abscisic acid treatment , 1995 .

[5]  E. Peterlunger,et al.  Effects of Shoot Orientation on Growth, Net Photosynthesis, and Hydraulic Conductivity of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Cortese , 1995 .

[6]  W. Kliewer,et al.  The Light Environment Within Grapevine Canopies. II. Influence of Leaf Area Density on Fruit Zone Light Environment and Some Canopy Assessment Parameters , 1995, American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.

[7]  P. Clingeleffer,et al.  Comparative study of vine morphology, growth, and canopy development in cane-pruned and minimal-pruned Sultana , 1995 .

[8]  R. E. Sharp,et al.  Confirmation that abscisic acid accumulation is required for maize primary root elongation at low water potentials , 1994 .

[9]  D. Eissenstat,et al.  The fate of surface roots of citrus seedlings in dry soil , 1994 .

[10]  R. Augé,et al.  Non-hydraulic root-to-shoot signalling in mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal sorghum exposed to partial soil drying or root severing , 1994 .

[11]  W. Davies,et al.  How Do Chemical Signals Work in Plants that Grow in Drying Soil? , 1994, Plant physiology.

[12]  A. Lakso,et al.  Interactions of Crop Level and Late Season Water Stress on Growth and Physiology of Field-Grown Concord Grapevines , 1994, American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.

[13]  H. Jones,et al.  Xylem-Transported Chemical Signals and the Regulation of Plant Growth and Physiology , 1993 .

[14]  John Grace,et al.  Does Xylem Sap ABA Control the Stomatal Behaviour of Water-Stressed Sycamore (Acer pseudoplatanus L.) Seedlings? , 1993 .

[15]  A. Naor,et al.  Effect of Post-Veraison Irrigation Level on Sauvignon blanc Yield, Juice Quality and Water Relations , 1993 .

[16]  Jianhua Zhang,et al.  Stomatal control by both [ABA] in the xylem sap and leaf water status: a test of a model for draughted or ABA‐fed field‐grown maize , 1993 .

[17]  P. B. Lombard,et al.  Environmental and Management Practices Affecting Grape Composition and Wine Quality - A Review , 1993, American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.

[18]  M. Tagliavini,et al.  Influence of root pruning and water stress on growth and physiological factors of potted apple, grape, peach and pear trees , 1992 .

[19]  E. Schulze,et al.  Cytokinins in the xylem sap of desert-grown almond (Prunus dulcis†) trees: Daily courses and their possible interactions with abscisic acid and leaf conductance. , 1992, The New phytologist.

[20]  Ulrich Schurr,et al.  Stomatal response to drying soil in relation to changes in the xylem sap composition of Helianthus annuus. II.Stomatal sensitivity to abscisic acid imported from the xylem sap , 1992 .

[21]  Ulrich Schurr,et al.  Stomatal response to drying soil in relation to changes in the xylem sap composition of Helianthus annuus. I. The concentration of cations, anions, amino acids in, and pH of, the xylem sap , 1992 .

[22]  J. Cornell,et al.  Root restriction affects shoot development of peach in a high-density orchard , 1992 .

[23]  Jianhua Zhang,et al.  What information is conveyed by an ABA signal from maize roots in drying field soil , 1992 .

[24]  O. Bethenod,et al.  Xylem ABA controls the stomatal conductance of field‐grown maize subjected to soil compaction or soil drying , 1992 .

[25]  W. Davies,et al.  Stomatal response to abscisic Acid is a function of current plant water status. , 1992, Plant physiology.

[26]  F. Meinzer,et al.  Root Signals Mediate Coordination of Stomatal and Hydraulic Conductance in Growing Sugarcane , 1991 .

[27]  D. Jackson Environmental and Hormonal Effects on Development of Early Bunch Stem Necrosis , 1991 .

[28]  William J. Davies,et al.  Root Signals and the Regulation of Growth and Development of Plants in Drying Soil , 1991 .

[29]  H. Jones,et al.  A Positive Root-sourced Signal as an Indicator of Soil Drying in Apple, Malus x domestica Borkh. , 1990 .

[30]  Jianhua Zhang,et al.  Does ABA in the Xylem Control the Rate of Leaf Growth in Soil-Dried Maize and Sunflower Plants? , 1990 .

[31]  Jianhua Zhang,et al.  Changes in the concentration of ABA in xylem sap as a function of changing soil water status can account for changes in leaf conductance and growth , 1990 .

[32]  I. Goodwin,et al.  Regulated deficit irrigation of Cabernet Sauvignon grapevines. , 1990 .

[33]  B. Coombe THE GRAPE BERRY AS A SINK , 1989 .

[34]  D. Ferree,et al.  ROOT PRUNING FOR GROWTH CONTROL IN APPLE TREES , 1989 .

[35]  S. Nagarajah PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSES OF GRAPEVINES TO WATER STRESS , 1989 .

[36]  M. Matthews,et al.  Reproductive Development in Grape (Vitis viniferaL.): Responses to Seasonal Water Deficits , 1989, American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.

[37]  L. Williams,et al.  The effect of paclobutrazol injected into the soil on vegetative growth and yield of Vitis vinifera L., cv. Thompson Seedless , 1989 .

[38]  Jianhua Zhang,et al.  Abscisic acid produced in dehydrating roots may enable the plant to measure the water status of the soil , 1989 .

[39]  R. E. Sharp,et al.  Plants under Stress: Regulation of growth and development of plants growing with a restricted supply of water , 1989 .

[40]  Mark A. Matthews,et al.  Fruit Ripening inVitis viniferaL.: Responses to Seasonal Water Deficits , 1988, American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.

[41]  Jianhua Zhang,et al.  Control of Stomatal Behaviour by Abscisic Acid which Apparently Originates in the Roots , 1987 .

[42]  S. Lavee USEFULLNESS OF GROWTH REGULATORS FOR CONTROLLING VINE GROWTH AND IMPROVING GRAPE QUALITY IN INTENSIVE VINEYARDS , 1987 .

[43]  H. Düring OSMOTIC ADJUSTMENT IN GRAPEVINES , 1985 .

[44]  H. Jones PHYSIOLOGICAL MECHANISMS INVOLVED IN THE CONTROL OF LEAF WATER STATUS: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE ESTIMATION OF TREE WATER STATUS , 1985 .

[45]  B. Loveys DIURNAL CHANGES IN WATER RELATIONS AND ABSCISIC ACID IN FIELD‐GROWN VITIS VINIFERA CULTIVARS , 1984 .

[46]  A. Carmi,et al.  Root Effects on Cotton Growth and Yield 1 , 1983 .

[47]  W. Davies,et al.  Inhibition of Light-Stimulated Leaf Expansion by Abscisic Acid , 1983 .

[48]  D. Chalmers,et al.  Control of peach tree growth and productivity by regulated water supply, tree density, and summer pruning [Trickle irrigation] , 1981 .

[49]  P. Clingeleffer,et al.  The response of the grape cultivar Crouchen (Australian syn. Clare Riesling) to various trellis and pruning treatments , 1976 .

[50]  T. Hsiao Plant Responses to Water Stress , 1973 .

[51]  A. Winkler Effect of Vine Spacing in an Unirrigated Vineyard on Vine Physiology, Production and Wine Quality , 1969, American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.

[52]  P. May The effect of direction of shoot growth on fruitfulness and yield of sultana vines , 1966 .

[53]  A. Winkler The Effect of Vine Spacing at Oakville on Yields, Fruit Composition, and Wine Quality , 1959, American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.

[54]  H. Heyns Birth-weight of beef cattle important. , 1959 .