Attentional and automatic processes in line tracing: Is tracing obligatory?

When comparing two target elements placed on the same convoluted curve, response times are dependent on the distance between the targets along the curve, despite being separated by a constant Euclidean distance. The present study assessed whether such line tracing is obligatory across the whole of the line even when the task demands do not require it, or whether it is an optional strategy that can be disregarded when the circumstances favor a different method of attentional deployment. Three experiments were conducted to assess whether attention can select only a portion of a curve to trace when it is strategically sensible to do so. The results suggest that attention can indeed jump over portions of a line that are irrelevant to task performance before tracing has begun. However, the final experiment suggests that line tracing may continue beyond the task-relevant portion of the line. We conclude that line tracing is a strategy whose initial deployment can be influenced by top-down factors, rather than an obligatory response triggered by the stimuli—although, once engaged, line tracing may be hard to stop.

[1]  J. Duncan,et al.  Coordination of what and where in Visual Attention , 1993, Perception.

[2]  G. Underwood,et al.  Does attention move or spread during mental curve tracing? , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  S. Ullman,et al.  Curve tracing: A possible basic operation in the perception of spatial relations , 1986, Memory & cognition.

[4]  I Kovács,et al.  A closed curve is much more than an incomplete one: effect of closure in figure-ground segmentation. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  Victor A. F. Lamme,et al.  The implementation of visual routines , 2000, Vision Research.

[6]  H. Spekreijse,et al.  The spatial profile of visual attention in mental curve tracing , 2001, Vision Research.

[7]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  fMRI evidence for objects as the units of attentional selection , 1999, Nature.

[8]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  N Lavie,et al.  On the spatial extent of attention in object-based visual selection , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  P Jolicoeur,et al.  Size invariance in curve tracing , 1991, Memory & cognition.

[11]  H E Egeth,et al.  Mental curve tracing with elementary stimuli. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[13]  Manfred Fahle,et al.  Parallel perception of vernier offsets, curvature, and chevrons in humans , 1991, Vision Research.

[14]  Pieter R. Roelfsema,et al.  A gradual spread of attention , 2003 .

[15]  Sarah Shomstein,et al.  Object-based attention: Sensory modulation or priority setting? , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  A. Georgopoulos,et al.  Mental Maze Solving , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[17]  Ronald A. Rensink The Dynamic Representation of Scenes , 2000 .

[18]  Y. Tsal Movements of attention across the visual field. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  David Crundall,et al.  Object-based attention is mediated by collinearity of targets , 2007, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[20]  Pieter R Roelfsema,et al.  Subtask sequencing in the primary visual cortex , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  D. Sagi,et al.  Visual attention and perceptual grouping , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[22]  Judith Avrahami,et al.  Objects of attention, objects of perception , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[23]  P Jolicoeur,et al.  Manipulating the shape of distance effects in visual curve tracing: further evidence for the zoom lens model. , 1994, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[24]  David J. Field,et al.  Contour integration by the human visual system: Evidence for a local “association field” , 1993, Vision Research.

[25]  P. Jolicoeur,et al.  Capturing visual attention and the curve tracing operation , 1992 .

[26]  Pierre Jolicoeur,et al.  Predicting the shape of distance functions in curve tracing: Evidence for a zoom lens operator , 1991, Memory & cognition.

[27]  S Ullman,et al.  Visual curve tracing properties. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  G. Sperling,et al.  Episodic theory of the dynamics of spatial attention. , 1995 .

[29]  M Boucart,et al.  The Computation of Contour Information in Complex Objects , 1994, Perception.

[30]  R. Rafal,et al.  Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.