Efficient or adaptive markets? Evidence from major stock markets using very long run historic data

This paper empirically investigates the Adaptive Market Hypothesis (AMH) in three of the most established stock markets in the world; the US, UK and Japanese markets using very long run data. Daily data is divided into five-yearly subsamples and subjected to linear and nonlinear tests to determine how the independence of stock returns has behaved over time. Further, a five-type classification is proposed to distinguish the differing behaviour of stock returns. The results from the linear autocorrelation, runs and variance ratio tests reveal that each market shows evidence of being an adaptive market, with returns going through periods of independence and dependence. However, the results from the nonlinear tests show strong dependence for every subsample in each market, although the magnitude of dependence varies quite considerably. Thus the linear dependence of stock returns varies over time but nonlinear dependence is strong throughout. Our overall results suggest that the AMH provides a better description of the behaviour of stock returns than the Efficient Market Hypothesis.

[1]  R. Engle.  Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflation , 1982 .

[2]  Petre Caraiani,et al.  Nonlinear dynamics in CEE stock markets indices , 2011 .

[3]  A. I. McLeod,et al.  DIAGNOSTIC CHECKING ARMA TIME SERIES MODELS USING SQUARED‐RESIDUAL AUTOCORRELATIONS , 1983 .

[4]  David Hsieh.  Chaos and Nonlinear Dynamics: Application to Financial Markets , 1991 .

[5]  B. Kamaiah,et al.  Non-Linear Dependence in Stock Returns: Evidences from India , 2010 .

[6]  A. Lo,et al.  Stock Market Prices Do Not Follow Random Walks: Evidence from a Simple Specification Test , 1987 .

[7]  Kambiz Farahmand,et al.  The behaviour of some UK equity indices: An application of Hurst and BDS tests 1 A previous version , 1999 .

[8]  K. Lim,et al.  Non‐Linear Predictability in G7 Stock Index Returns , 2013 .

[9]  M. Hinich,et al.  Nonlinear serial dependence and the weak-form efficiency of Asian emerging stock markets , 2008 .

[10]  Narasimhan Jegadeesh,et al.  Returns to Buying Winners and Selling Losers: Implications for Stock Market Efficiency , 1993 .

[11]  Jae H. Kim,et al.  Stock Return Predictability and the Adaptive Markets Hypothesis: Evidence from Century Long U.S. Data , 2010 .

[12]  A. Lo.  The Adaptive Markets Hypothesis , 2004 .

[13]  Graham Smith.  The changing and relative efficiency of European emerging stock markets , 2012 .

[14]  Jae H. Kim,et al.  A comparison of variance ratio tests of random walk: A case of Asian emerging stock markets , 2007 .

[15]  P. Alagidede.  Return behaviour in Africa's emerging equity markets , 2011 .

[16]  B. LeBaron,et al.  A test for independence based on the correlation dimension , 1996 .

[17]  K. Lim,et al.  Are US stock index returns predictable? Evidence from automatic autocorrelation-based tests , 2013 .

[18]  Mikio Ito,et al.  Measuring the degree of time varying market inefficiency , 2009 .

[19]  E. Fama.  EFFICIENT CAPITAL MARKETS: A REVIEW OF THEORY AND EMPIRICAL WORK* , 1970 .

[20]  J. Hull.  Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives , 1989 .

[21]  B. LeBaron,et al.  Simple Technical Trading Rules and the Stochastic Properties of Stock Returns , 1992 .

[22]  E. Fama.  The Behavior of Stock-Market Prices , 1965 .

[23]  In Choi.  Testing the random walk hypothesis for real exchange rates , 1999 .

[24]  Shu-Heng Chen,et al.  On the emergent properties of artificial stock markets: the efficient market hypothesis and the rational expectations hypothesis , 2002 .

[25]  Maria Rosa Borges.  Efficient market hypothesis in European stock markets , 2008 .

[26]  Alexandru Todea,et al.  Adaptive Markets Hypothesis - Evidence from Asia-Pacific Financial Markets , 2009 .

[27]  E. Fama,et al.  Permanent and Temporary Components of Stock Prices , 1988, Journal of Political Economy.