Subject-specific heart rate dependency of electrocardiographic QT, PQ, and QRS intervals.

Although heart rate dependency of QT interval is well known, the relationship of other electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters to heart rate has been researched less intensively. This study investigated the heart rate dependencies of QT interval, PQ interval, and QRS width in 40 healthy subjects (18 women; mean age, 30.4 +/- 8.1 years). In each subject, 3 long-term (approximately 13 hours) 12-lead ECGs were obtained for 3 day-time periods with gaps of 2 to 3 weeks between repeated recordings. In each recording, approximately 230 ECG measurements of QT interval, PQ interval, and QRS width were made, each preceded by stable heart rate. For each recording, linear regression slopes of QT/RR, PQ/RR, and QRS/RR relationships were obtained. Intrasubject SDs of individual values were compared with intersubject SDs of intrasubject means to test the individuality of the relationships. The intrasubject means of the slope values were also compared between sexes. The individual SDs of the QT/RR regression slopes were 0.0116 +/- 0.0065, whereas the population SD of intrasubject means was 0.0245 (P = 3.6 x 10(-15)). For the PQ/RR slopes and QRS/RR slopes, these values were 0.0085 +/- 0.0050 vs 0.0314 (P = 7.9 x 10(-28)) and 0.00189 +/- 0.00157 vs 0.00550 (P = 2.6 x 10(-17)), respectively. The QT/RR slopes were steeper in women than in men (0.194 +/- 0.019 vs 0.168 +/- 0.022, 0.0005), whereas the QRS/RR slopes were, on average, negative in women while positive in men (-0.00138 +/- 0.0045 vs 0.00335 +/- 0.0054, P = .005). There were no sex differences in the PQ/RR slopes (0.054 +/- 0.032 in women vs 0.055 +/- 0.031 in men, P = .95). Thus, not only the heart rate dependency of QT interval but also the rate dependencies of PQ interval and of QRS width show high intrasubject stability with substantial intersubject differences.

[1]  L. S. Fridericia.  Die Systolendauer im Elektrokardiogramm bei normalen Menschen und bei Herzkranken , 2009 .

[2]  Katerina Hnatkova,et al.  Sex differences in the rate dependence of the T wave descending limb. , 2003, Cardiovascular research.

[3]  A. Garrod.  On some points connected with the circulation of the blood, arrived at from a study of the sphygmograph-trace , 1875, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London.

[4]  D. VanFossen,et al.  Exercise-induced QRS prolongation in patients with coronary artery disease: a marker of myocardial ischemia. , 1993, American heart journal.

[5]  Katerina Hnatkova,et al.  Ventricular gradient and nondipolar repolarization components increase at higher heart rate. , 2004, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[6]  Is There a Physiologic QT/RR Relationship? , 2002, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[7]  A. Kadish,et al.  Effects of Gender on Cardiac Arrhythmias , 1998, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[8]  H. Bazett,et al.  AN ANALYSIS OF THE TIME‐RELATIONS OF ELECTROCARDIOGRAMS. , 1997 .

[9]  Philip Langley,et al.  Effect of changes in heart rate and in action potential duration on the electrocardiogram T wave shape. , 2002, Physiological measurement.

[10]  I. Schlamowitz.  An analysis of the time relationships within the cardiac cycle in electrocardiograms of normal men; the duration of the P-R interval and its relationship to the cycle length (R-R interval). , 1946, American heart journal.

[11]  H. Boudoulas,et al.  Linear relationship between electrical systole, mechanical systole, and heart rate. , 1981, Chest.

[12]  P. Rautaharju,et al.  Linearly Scaled, Rate‐Invariant Normal Limits for QT Interval: Eight Decades of Incorrect Application of Power Functions , 2002, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[13]  Katerina Hnatkova,et al.  Assessment of Noise in Digital Electrocardiograms , 2002, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[14]  A. Camm,et al.  QT-RR relationship in healthy subjects exhibits substantial intersubject variability and high intrasubject stability. , 2002, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[15]  A. Camm,et al.  Relation between QT and RR intervals is highly individual among healthy subjects: implications for heart rate correction of the QT interval , 2002, Heart.

[16]  I.K. Duskalov,et al.  Developments in ECG acquisition, preprocessing, parameter measurement, and recording , 1998, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[17]  M. Yoshinaga,et al.  Exponential correction of QT interval to minimize the effect of the heart rate in children. , 1993, Japanese circulation journal.

[18]  H N Keiser,et al.  Electrocardiogram baseline noise estimation and removal using cubic splines and state-space computation techniques. , 1977, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[19]  Katerina Hnatkova,et al.  Sex differences in repolarization homogeneity and its circadian pattern. , 2002, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[20]  M Kawataki,et al.  Relation between QT interval and heart rate. applications and limitations of Bazett's formula. , 1984, Journal of electrocardiology.

[21]  Morrison Hodges,et al.  Rate Correction of the QT Interval , 1997 .

[22]  R. Seegobin,et al.  Sex differences and frequency content of the Frank lead signal-averaged ECG in a normal population. , 1996, Journal of electrocardiology.

[23]  Ernst Simonson,et al.  Sex Differences in the Electrocardiogram , 1960 .

[24]  E SIMONSON,et al.  The normal Q-T interval. , 1962, American heart journal.

[25]  M. Malik,et al.  Differences Between Study‐Specific and Subject‐Specific Heart Rate Corrections of the QT Interval in Investigations of Drug Induced QTc Prolongation , 2004, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.