Quantifying spatial habitat loss from hydrocarbon development through assessing habitat selection patterns of mule deer

Extraction of oil and natural gas (hydrocarbons) from shale is increasing rapidly in North America, with documented impacts to native species and ecosystems. With shale oil and gas resources on nearly every continent, this development is set to become a major driver of global land-use change. It is increasingly critical to quantify spatial habitat loss driven by this development to implement effective mitigation strategies and develop habitat offsets. Habitat selection is a fundamental ecological process, influencing both individual fitness and population-level distribution on the landscape. Examinations of habitat selection provide a natural means for understanding spatial impacts. We examined the impact of natural gas development on habitat selection patterns of mule deer on their winter range in Colorado. We fit resource selection functions in a Bayesian hierarchical framework, with habitat availability defined using a movement-based modeling approach. Energy development drove considerable alterations to deer habitat selection patterns, with the most substantial impacts manifested as avoidance of well pads with active drilling to a distance of at least 800 m. Deer displayed more nuanced responses to other infrastructure, avoiding pads with active production and roads to a greater degree during the day than night. In aggregate, these responses equate to alteration of behavior by human development in over 50% of the critical winter range in our study area during the day and over 25% at night. Compared to other regions, the topographic and vegetative diversity in the study area appear to provide refugia that allow deer to behaviorally mediate some of the impacts of development. This study, and the methods we employed, provides a template for quantifying spatial take by industrial activities in natural areas and the results offer guidance for policy makers, mangers, and industry when attempting to mitigate habitat loss due to energy development.

[1]  P. Lendrum,et al.  Migrating Mule Deer: Effects of Anthropogenically Altered Landscapes , 2013, PloS one.

[2]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[3]  George Wittemyer,et al.  Fine-scale genetic correlates to condition and migration in a wild cervid , 2014, Evolutionary applications.

[4]  Mark S Boyce,et al.  Correlation and studies of habitat selection: problem, red herring or opportunity? , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  K. Train,et al.  Mixed Logit with Repeated Choices: Households' Choices of Appliance Efficiency Level , 1998, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[6]  Gary C. White,et al.  Compensatory mortality in a Colorado mule deer population , 1992 .

[7]  Mark S. Boyce,et al.  Scale for resource selection functions , 2006 .

[8]  G. White,et al.  Mule deer survival in Colorado, Idaho, and Montana , 1999 .

[9]  Monica G. Turner,et al.  Scale and heterogeneity in habitat selection by elk in Yellowstone National Park , 2003 .

[10]  Gordon B. Stenhouse,et al.  Temporal autocorrelation functions for movement rates from global positioning system radiotelemetry data , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[11]  M. Boyce,et al.  WOLVES INFLUENCE ELK MOVEMENTS: BEHAVIOR SHAPES A TROPHIC CASCADE IN YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK , 2005 .

[12]  宮森 悠.  ライブラリー Annual Energy Outlook 2000 , 2000 .

[13]  weStern hemiSphere,et al.  Technically Recoverable Shale Oil and Shale Gas Resources: , 2013 .

[14]  H. Pulliam,et al.  Sources, Sinks, and Habitat Selection: A Landscape Perspective on Population Dynamics , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[15]  Leo Polansky,et al.  Disentangling the effects of forage, social rank, and risk on movement autocorrelation of elephants using Fourier and wavelet analyses , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  Gordon B. Stenhouse,et al.  Removing GPS collar bias in habitat selection studies , 2004 .

[17]  Lee A. Vierling,et al.  Effects of habitat on GPS collar performance: using data screening to reduce location error , 2007 .

[18]  Stephen L. Webb,et al.  Prioritizing Conservation of Ungulate Calving Resources in Multiple-Use Landscapes , 2011, PloS one.

[19]  S. Creel,et al.  Elk alter habitat selection as an antipredator response to wolves , 2005 .

[20]  Ryan M. Nielson,et al.  Influence of Well Pad Activity on Winter Habitat Selection Patterns of Mule Deer , 2009 .

[21]  Devin S Johnson,et al.  Continuous-time correlated random walk model for animal telemetry data. , 2008, Ecology.

[22]  A. Houston,et al.  The cost of disturbance: a waste of time and energy? , 2012 .

[23]  Mark S Boyce,et al.  Selection, use, choice and occupancy: clarifying concepts in resource selection studies. , 2013, The Journal of animal ecology.

[24]  Gordon B. Stenhouse,et al.  Agricultural lands as ecological traps for grizzly bears , 2012 .

[25]  P. Switzer.  Past reproductive success affects future habitat selection , 1997, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[26]  S. Fretwell,et al.  On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds , 1969 .

[27]  Mark S Boyce,et al.  Habitat selection predicts genetic relatedness in an alpine ungulate. , 2012, Ecology.

[28]  Daniel Fortin,et al.  Mixed conditional logistic regression for habitat selection studies. , 2010, The Journal of animal ecology.

[29]  Joseph Hilbe,et al.  Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models , 2009 .

[30]  M. Hebblewhite,et al.  Are All Global Positioning System Collars Created Equal? Correcting Habitat-Induced Bias Using Three Brands in the Central Canadian Rockies , 2007 .

[31]  G. Wittemyer,et al.  Characterising the impacts of emerging energy development on wildlife, with an eye towards mitigation. , 2013, Ecology letters.

[32]  Chris J. Johnson,et al.  MODELING SURVIVAL: APPLICATION OF THE ANDERSEN–GILL MODEL TO YELLOWSTONE GRIZZLY BEARS , 2004 .

[33]  Mevin B Hooten,et al.  Practical guidance on characterizing availability in resource selection functions under a use-availability design. , 2013, Ecology.

[34]  A. Frid,et al.  Synthesis Human-caused Disturbance Stimuli as a Form of Predation Risk , 2002 .

[35]  W. Rice.  Speciation via habitat specialization: the evolution of reproductive isolation as a correlated character , 1987, Evolutionary Ecology.

[36]  Donna Delparte,et al.  Effects of radio‐collar position and orientation on GPS radio‐collar performance, and the implications of PDOP in data screening , 2005 .

[37]  J. Berger.  Fear, human shields and the redistribution of prey and predators in protected areas , 2007, Biology Letters.

[38]  Joseph M. Northrup,et al.  Effects of helicopter capture and handling on movement behavior of mule deer , 2014 .

[39]  Mark Hebblewhite,et al.  Modelling wildlife–human relationships for social species with mixed‐effects resource selection models , 2007 .

[40]  K. Parker,et al.  Energy expenditures for locomotion by mule deer and elk , 1984 .

[41]  Mark A. Hurley,et al.  Spatial Distributions of Mule Deer and North American Elk: Resource Partitioning in a Sage-Steppe Environment , 2010 .

[42]  S. L. Lima,et al.  Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus , 1990 .

[43]  R. Bowyer,et al.  HABITAT SELECTION BY MULE DEER: FORAGE BENEFITS OR RISK OF PREDATION? , 2004 .

[44]  RYAN M. NIELSON,et al.  Winter Habitat Selection of Mule Deer Before and During Development of a Natural Gas Field , 2006 .

[45]  Mevin B. Hooten,et al.  Temporal variation and scale in movement-based resource selection functions , 2014 .

[46]  Douglas H. Johnson.  THE COMPARISON OF USAGE AND AVAILABILITY MEASUREMENTS FOR EVALUATING RESOURCE PREFERENCE , 1980 .

[47]  Gordon B. Stenhouse,et al.  Vehicle traffic shapes grizzly bear behaviour on a multiple‐use landscape , 2012 .

[48]  S. Creel,et al.  Relationships between direct predation and risk effects. , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[49]  D. Rubin,et al.  Inference from Iterative Simulation Using Multiple Sequences , 1992 .