Navigating urolithiasis treatment: assessing the practicality and performance of thulium fiber laser, holmium YAG, and thulium YAG in real-world scenarios

[1]  K. Sarıca,et al.  Do Hounsfield Units have any significance in predicting intra- and postoperative outcomes in retrograde intrarenal surgery using Holmium and Thulium fiber laser? Results from the FLEXible ureteroscopy Outcomes Registry (FLEXOR) , 2023, World Journal of Urology.

[2]  S. Nakada,et al.  Pulse-modulated Holmium:YAG Laser vs the Thulium Fiber Laser for Renal and Ureteral Stones: A Single-center Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial , 2023, The Journal of urology.

[3]  R. Clayman,et al.  Comparison of Superpulse Thulium Fiber Laser vs. Holmium Laser for Ablation of Renal Calculi in an In-Vivo Porcine Model. , 2022, Journal of endourology.

[4]  W. Molina,et al.  Image Distortion During Flexible Ureteroscopy: a Laboratory Model Comparing SuperPulsed Thulium Fiber Laser vs. High-Power Ho:YAG Laser. , 2022, Journal of endourology.

[5]  O. Traxer,et al.  Initial clinical experience with the thulium fiber laser from Quanta System: First 50 reported cases , 2022, World Journal of Urology.

[6]  J. Linscott,et al.  Ureteroscopy with thulium fiber laser lithotripsy results in shorter operating times and large cost savings , 2022, World Journal of Urology.

[7]  S. Mahajan,et al.  Authors reply Re: Mahajan AD, Mahajan SA. Thulium fiber laser versus holmium:yttrium aluminum garnet laser for stone lithotripsy during mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A prospective randomized trial. Indian J Urol 2022;38:42-7 , 2022, Indian Journal of Urology.

[8]  Abhijit A. Patil,et al.  Holmium with MOSES technology or Thulium Fiber Laser in Miniperc with suction - A new curiosity. , 2022, Journal of endourology.

[9]  C. Beisland,et al.  Thulium Fibre Laser versus Holmium:YAG for Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: Outcomes from a Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial. , 2022, European urology.

[10]  O. Traxer,et al.  Re: Dusting Efficiency of a Novel Pulsed Thulium:Yttrium Aluminum Garnet Laser vs a Thulium Fiber Laser. , 2022, European urology.

[11]  S. Mahajan,et al.  Thulium fiber laser versus holmium:yttrium aluminum garnet laser for stone lithotripsy during mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A prospective randomized trial , 2022, Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India.

[12]  L. Berthe,et al.  Laser Fiber Displacement Velocity during Tm-Fiber and Ho:YAG Laser Lithotripsy: Introducing the Concept of Optimal Displacement Velocity , 2021, Journal of clinical medicine.

[13]  R. Suarez-Ibarrola,et al.  In vitro fragmentation performance of a novel, pulsed Thulium solid-state laser compared to a Thulium fibre laser and standard Ho:YAG laser , 2021, Lasers in Medical Science.

[14]  Abhijit A. Patil,et al.  A prospective comparative study of mini-PCNL using Trilogy™ or thulium fibre laser with suction , 2021, World Journal of Urology.

[15]  R. Clayman,et al.  Ex-vivo Renal Stone Dusting: Impact of Laser Modality, Ureteral Access Sheath, and Suction on Total Stone Clearance. , 2021, Journal of endourology.

[16]  R. Suarez-Ibarrola,et al.  Dusting efficiency of a novel, pulsed Thulium: YAG laser versus a Thulium fiber laser. , 2021, Journal of endourology.

[17]  L. Berthe,et al.  Comparison of Holmium:YAG and Thulium Fiber Lasers on the Risk of Laser Fiber Fracture , 2021, Journal of clinical medicine.

[18]  D. Enikeev,et al.  Retrograde intrarenal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy in larger kidney stones. Could SuperPulsed Thulium-fiber laser change the game? , 2021, Central European journal of urology.

[19]  R. Clayman,et al.  Caveat Emptor: The Heat Is "ON": An In Vivo Evaluation of the Thulium Fiber Laser and Temperature Changes in the Porcine Kidney during Dusting and Fragmentation Modes. , 2021, Journal of endourology.

[20]  O. Traxer,et al.  Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy with SuperPulsed Thulium-fiber laser , 2021, Urolithiasis.

[21]  M. Humphreys,et al.  Ureteroscopic Performance of High Power Super Pulse Thulium Fiber Laser for the Treatment of Urolithiasis: Results of the First Case Series in North America. , 2021, Urology.

[22]  O. Traxer,et al.  Initial clinical experience with the new thulium fiber laser: first 50 cases , 2021, World Journal of Urology.

[23]  Xiaofeng Gao,et al.  Ablation efficiency of a novel Thulium fiber laser: an in vitro study on laser setting and fiber usage. , 2021, Journal of endourology.

[24]  D. Enikeev,et al.  Endoscopic lithotripsy with a SuperPulsed thulium‐fiber laser for ureteral stones: A single‐center experience , 2020, International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association.

[25]  A. Martov,et al.  Clinical Comparison of Super Pulse Thulium Fiber Laser and High-Power Holmium Laser for Ureteral Stone Management. , 2020, Journal of endourology.

[26]  R. Suarez-Ibarrola,et al.  Temperature assessment of a novel pulsed Thulium solid-state laser compared to a Holmium:YAG laser. , 2020, Journal of endourology.

[27]  L. Berthe,et al.  IMPACT OF LASER FIBER DIAMETER AND IRRIGATION FLUIDS ON INDUCED BUBBLE STREAM DYNAMICS WITH SUPERPULSED THULIUM FIBER LASER : AN IN VITRO STUDY. , 2020, Journal of endourology.

[28]  Abhijit A. Patil,et al.  A clinical experience of thulium fibre laser in miniperc to dust with suction: a new horizon , 2020, World Journal of Urology.

[29]  A. Miernik,et al.  In vitro dusting performance of a new solid state Thulium laser compared to Holmium laser lithotripsy. , 2020, Journal of endourology.

[30]  O. Traxer,et al.  Superpulsed thulium-fiber laser for stone dusting - in search of perfect ablation regimen. A prospective single center study. , 2020, Journal of endourology.

[31]  O. Traxer,et al.  How do we assess the efficacy of Ho:YAG low-power laser lithotripsy for the treatment of upper tract urinary stones? Introducing the Joules/mm3 and laser activity concepts , 2020, World Journal of Urology.

[32]  M. Daudon,et al.  Thulium fiber laser: ready to dust all urinary stone composition types? , 2020, World Journal of Urology.

[33]  O. Traxer,et al.  Effect of temporal pulse shape on urinary stone phantom retropulsion rate and ablation efficiency using holmium:YAG and super‐pulse thulium fibre lasers , 2020, BJU international.

[34]  L. Berthe,et al.  Comparison of the ablation rates, fissures and fragments produced with 150 µm and 272 µm laser fibers with superpulsed thulium fiber laser: an in vitro study , 2020, World Journal of Urology.

[35]  L. Berthe,et al.  PD04-12 IN VITRO COMPARISON OF ABLATION RATES BETWEEN SUPERPULSED THULIUM FIBER LASER AND HO:YAG LASER FOR ENDOCORPOREAL LITHOTRIPSY , 2020 .

[36]  B. Knudsen,et al.  PD30-01 COMPARISON OF SMALL CORE DIAMETER LASER FIBERS USED FOR LITHOTRIPSY WITH A 120W HO , 2020, Journal of Urology.

[37]  M. Elhilali,et al.  Double-Blinded Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Regular and Moses Modes of Holmium Laser Lithotripsy , 2020, Journal of endourology.

[38]  O. Traxer,et al.  Thulium-fiber laser for lithotripsy: first clinical experience in percutaneous nephrolithotomy , 2020, World Journal of Urology.

[39]  D. Enikeev,et al.  How Lasers Ablate Stones: In-vitro Study of Laser Lithotripsy (Ho:YAG and Tm-fiber lasers) in Different Environments. , 2019, Journal of endourology.

[40]  Olivier Traxer,et al.  The laser of the future: reality and expectations about the new thulium fiber laser-a systematic review. , 2019, Translational andrology and urology.

[41]  R. Suarez-Ibarrola,et al.  Thermal effects of Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy during retrograde intrarenal surgery and percutaneous nephrolithotomy in an ex vivo porcine kidney model , 2019, World Journal of Urology.

[42]  B. Somani,et al.  PD01-05 HIGH POWER HOLMIM MOSES TECHNOLOGY VERSUS SUPER-PULSE THULIUM FIBRE LASER. WHICH IS MORE EFFICIENT ON STONES? , 2019, Journal of Urology.

[43]  O. Traxer,et al.  V01-11 THULIUM SUPERPULSE FIBER LASER (TSPFL) MICRO-PCNL: HOW TO IMPROVE STONE-FREE RATE (SFR) , 2019, Journal of Urology.

[44]  L. Berthe,et al.  PD59-06 IN VITRO COMPARISON OF EFFICIENCY BETWEEN SUPERPULSED THULIUM FIBER LASER AND HO: YAG LASER FOR ENDOCORPOREAL LITHOTRIPSY , 2019, Journal of Urology.

[45]  O. Traxer,et al.  V01-09 SUPERPULSE THULIUM FIBER LASER FOR LITHOTRIPSY OF LARGE RENAL STONES: INITIAL EXPERIENCE , 2019, Journal of Urology.

[46]  L. Berthe,et al.  Impact of SuperPulse Thulium Fiber Laser settings and curve diameter on optical fiber fracture during intracorporeal lithotripsy , 2019, European urology. Supplement.

[47]  O. Traxer,et al.  MP03-20 DUSTING EFFICIENCY COMPARISON BETWEEN MOSES TECHNOLOGY OF HO: YAG LASER AND SUPERPULSE THULIUM FIBER LASER , 2019, Journal of Urology.

[48]  Olivier Traxer,et al.  Thulium fiber laser: the new player for kidney stone treatment? A comparison with Holmium:YAG laser , 2019, World Journal of Urology.

[49]  Nathaniel M. Fried,et al.  Advances in laser technology and fibre-optic delivery systems in lithotripsy , 2018, Nature Reviews Urology.

[50]  O. Traxer,et al.  V03-02 FIRST CLINICAL STUDY ON SUPERPULSE THULIUM FIBER LASER FOR LITHOTRIPSY , 2018 .

[51]  EmilianiEsteban,et al.  Impact of the Curve Diameter and Laser Settings on Laser Fiber Fracture , 2017 .

[52]  Gregory B. Altshuler,et al.  Comparison between the possibilities of holmium and thulium laser in lithotripsy in vitro , 2017 .

[53]  Nathaniel M. Fried,et al.  Thulium fiber laser ablation of kidney stones using a 50-μm-core silica optical fiber , 2014 .

[54]  Richard L. Blackmon,et al.  Comparison of holmium:YAG and thulium fiber laser lithotripsy: ablation thresholds, ablation rates, and retropulsion effects. , 2011, Journal of biomedical optics.

[55]  H. Razvi,et al.  Preliminary experience with holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy. , 1995, Journal of endourology.

[56]  B. Geavlete,et al.  Romanian National premiere with the new Thulium SuperPulsed Laser in the endourological treatment of urolithiasis , 2021, Journal of medicine and life.