An exploratory study of student engagement in gamified online discussions

Abstract This is an exploratory study that examines the influence of the gamification approach on student engagement in online discussions. A gamified online discussion tool, gEchoLu, was implemented in an undergraduate level online course, which held 22 online discussions. The data was collected through gEchoLu database, survey, and individual interviews with 12 students and the teaching assistant. The triangulated results revealed that the gamification approach positively affected student engagement. Factors such as technical issues, classmates' behaviors that either promoted or impeded students from engaging in the gamified online discussions were identified. The interview with the teaching assistant (TA) further revealed the influence of the gamification approach on student engagement from an educator's perspective, and the obstacles that the TA encountered in the gamified online discussions. Lessons learned are also shared in detail.

[1]  Christopher Cunningham,et al.  Gamification by Design - Implementing Game Mechanics in Web and Mobile Apps , 2011 .

[2]  Teresa K. Debacker,et al.  Extending the Traditional Classroom Through Online Discussion: The Role of Student Motivation , 2006 .

[3]  M. Hannafin,et al.  A Framework for Designing Scaffolds That Improve Motivation and Cognition , 2013, Educational psychologist.

[4]  Geoff R. Goehle.  Gamification and Web-based Homework , 2013 .

[5]  B. K. Bryant,et al.  The Effects of the Interpersonal Context of Evaluation on Self- and Other-Enhancement Behavior. , 1977 .

[6]  Galia Angelova,et al.  Gamification in Education: A Systematic Mapping Study , 2015, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[7]  Khe Foon Hew,et al.  Student contribution in asynchronous online discussion: a review of the research and empirical exploration , 2010 .

[8]  Jesse Fox,et al.  Assessing the effects of gamification in the classroom: A longitudinal study on intrinsic motivation, social comparison, satisfaction, effort, and academic performance , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[9]  E. Deci,et al.  Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[10]  Tianyi Zhang,et al.  Designing asynchronous online discussion environments: Recent progress and possible future directions , 2013, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[11]  Siobhan O'Donovan,et al.  A case study in the gamification of a university-level games development course , 2013, SAICSIT '13.

[12]  Timothy J. Newby,et al.  Using Socratic Questioning to Promote Critical Thinking Skills Through Asynchronous Discussion Forums in Distance Learning Environments , 2005 .

[13]  Curtis J. Bonk,et al.  Content analysis of online discussion in an applied educational psychology course , 2000 .

[14]  Marcia D. Dixson.  Creating effective student engagement in online courses: What do students find engaging? , 2010 .

[15]  Ben Leong,et al.  APPLICATION OF GAME MECHANICS TO IMPROVE STUDENT ENGAGEMENT , 2011 .

[16]  Charlotte N. Gunawardena,et al.  Analysis of a Global Online Debate and the Development of an Interaction Analysis Model for Examining Social Construction of Knowledge in Computer Conferencing , 1997 .

[17]  E. Deci,et al.  Overview of self-determination theory: An organismic-dialectical perspective. , 2002 .

[18]  P. Pintrich.  A Manual for the Use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). , 1991 .

[19]  Fengfeng Ke,et al.  The role of students' motivation in peer-moderated asynchronous online discussions , 2011, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[20]  E. Zhu.  Meaning Negotiation, Knowledge Construction, and Mentoring in a Distance Learning Course , 1996 .

[21]  Lu Ding,et al.  Studies of student engagement in gamified online discussions , 2017, Comput. Educ..

[22]  Derek Lester,et al.  A Review of the Student Engagement Literature , 2013 .

[23]  J. Best,et al.  Research in Education , 1966, Nature.

[24]  Timothy Koschmann,et al.  Paradigm shifts and instructional technology : An introduction , 1996 .

[25]  R. Ryan,et al.  Control and information in the intrapersonal sphere: An extension of cognitive evaluation theory. , 1982 .

[26]  Joaquim A. Jorge,et al.  Improving participation and learning with gamification , 2013, Gamification.

[27]  S. Jimerson,et al.  Toward an Understanding of Definitions and Measures of School Engagement and Related Terms , 2003 .

[28]  Khe Foon Hew,et al.  Toward an Understanding of Why Students Contribute in Asynchronous Online Discussions , 2008 .

[29]  Lennart E. Nacke,et al.  From game design elements to gamefulness: defining "gamification" , 2011, MindTrek.

[30]  Vanessa P. Dennen,et al.  From Message Posting to Learning Dialogues: Factors affecting learner participation in asynchronous discussion , 2005 .

[31]  Rebeca P. Díaz Redondo,et al.  A social gamification framework for a K-6 learning platform , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[32]  H. Simon,et al.  Situated Learning and Education1 , 1996 .

[33]  Theodore J. Kopcha,et al.  Teaching Technology Integration to K-12 Educators: A ‘Gamified’ Approach , 2016 .

[34]  Erping Zhu,et al.  Interaction and cognitive engagement: An analysis of four asynchronous online discussions , 2006 .

[35]  Karl M. Kapp,et al.  A Gamified Approach on Learning Logic Gates to Improve Student’s Engagement , 2012, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering.

[36]  Juho Hamari,et al.  Does Gamification Work? -- A Literature Review of Empirical Studies on Gamification , 2014, 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[37]  Wilhelmina C. Savenye,et al.  Adult Learner Participation in an Online Degree Program: A program‐level study of voluntary computer‐mediated communication , 2007 .

[38]  Paul Denny,et al.  The effect of virtual achievements on student engagement , 2013, CHI.

[39]  S. Harter.  Effectance Motivation Reconsidered. Toward a Developmental Model , 1978 .

[40]  Vance A. Durrington,et al.  Relationship between Students' Motivation and their Participation in Asynchronous Online Discussions , 2011 .

[41]  George D. Kuh,et al.  Student Engagement and Student Learning: Testing the Linkages* , 2006 .

[42]  Vanessa Paz Dennen,et al.  Pedagogical lurking: Student engagement in non-posting discussion behavior , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[43]  V. Shute.  Focus on Formative Feedback , 2008 .

[44]  Shui-fong Lam,et al.  Effects of competition on students' self-efficacy in vicarious learning. , 2008, The British journal of educational psychology.

[45]  Alexandru Iosup,et al.  An experience report on using gamification in technical higher education , 2014, SIGCSE.

[46]  Norman E. Wallen,et al.  How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education , 1990 .

[47]  Sean P. Goggins,et al.  Building models explaining student participation behavior in asynchronous online discussion , 2016, Comput. Educ..

[48]  Joey J. Lee,et al.  Gamification in Education: What, How, Why Bother? , 2011 .

[49]  J. McGonigal.  Reality Is Broken: Why Games Make Us Better and How They Can Change the World , 2011 .

[50]  E. Deci,et al.  Extrinsic Rewards and Intrinsic Motivation in Education: Reconsidered Once Again , 2001 .

[51]  Yu-Fen Yang,et al.  The influence of social interaction on meaning construction in a virtual community , 2010, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[52]  Jennifer A. Fredricks,et al.  School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence , 2004 .

[53]  Nancy L. Leech,et al.  Linking Research Questions to Mixed Methods Data Analysis Procedures 1 , 2006 .

[54]  Douglas R. Vogel,et al.  Assessing Individual-Level Factors Supporting Student Intrinsic Motivation in Online Discussions: A Qualitative Study , 2008, J. Inf. Syst. Educ..

[55]  Mark Guzdial,et al.  Effective Discussion Through a Computer-Mediated Anchored Forum , 2000 .

[56]  Anastasia Kitsantas,et al.  Self-regulated learning of a motoric skill: The role of goal setting and self-monitoring , 1996 .

[57]  D. Garrison,et al.  Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education , 2001 .

[58]  Khe Foon Hew,et al.  Sustaining Asynchronous Online Discussions: Contributing Factors and Peer Facilitation Techniques , 2009 .

[59]  Karen Swan,et al.  Virtual interaction: Design factors affecting student satisfaction and perceived learning in asynchronous online courses , 2001 .

[60]  R. B. Johnson,et al.  Educational Research: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches , 2007 .

[61]  Maria Puzziferro.  Online Technologies Self-Efficacy and Self-Regulated Learning as Predictors of Final Grade and Satisfaction in College-Level Online Courses , 2008 .

[62]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 1998 .