Congestion games with failures

We introduce a new class of games, congestion games with failures (CGFs), which allows for resource failures in congestion games. In a CGF, players share a common set of resources (service providers), where each service provider (SP) may fail with some known probability (that may be constant or depend on the congestion on the resource). For reliability reasons, a player may choose a subset of the SPs in order to try and perform his task. The cost of a player for utilizing any SP is a function of the total number of players using this SP. A main feature of this setting is that the cost for a player for successful completion of his task is the minimum of the costs of his successful attempts. We show that although CGFs do not, in general, admit a (generalized ordinal) potential function and the finite improvement property (and thus are not isomorphic to congestion games), they always possess a pure strategy Nash equilibrium. Moreover, every best reply dynamics converges to an equilibrium in any given CGF, and the SPs' congestion experienced in different equilibria is (almost) unique. Furthermore, we provide an efficient procedure for computing a pure strategy equilibrium in CGFs and show that every best equilibrium (one minimizing the sum of the players' disutilities) is semi-strong. Finally, for the subclass of symmetric CGFs we give a constructive characterization of best and worst equilibria.

[1]  José R. Correa,et al.  Fast, Fair, and Efficient Flows in Networks , 2007, Oper. Res..

[2]  Amit Kumar,et al.  Fairness Measures for Resource Allocation , 2006, SIAM J. Comput..

[3]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  Coalition-Proofness and Correlation with Arbitrary Communication Possibilities , 1996 .

[4]  I. Milchtaich,et al.  Congestion Games with Player-Specific Payoff Functions , 1996 .

[5]  Tim Roughgarden,et al.  The Price of Stability for Network Design with Fair Cost Allocation , 2004, FOCS.

[6]  Philip Wolfe,et al.  Contributions to the theory of games , 1953 .

[7]  Moshe Tennenholtz,et al.  Mechanism Design with Execution Uncertainty , 2002, UAI.

[8]  M. Whinston,et al.  Coalition-Proof Nash Equilibria I. Concepts , 1987 .

[9]  Nathan Linial,et al.  Game-theoretic aspects of computing , 1994 .

[10]  Ariel Orda,et al.  Competitive routing in multiuser communication networks , 1993, TNET.

[11]  I. Milchtaich,et al.  Congestion Models of Competition , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[12]  Tim Roughgarden,et al.  Selfish routing and the price of anarchy , 2005 .

[13]  William H. Sandholm,et al.  Potential Games with Continuous Player Sets , 2001, J. Econ. Theory.

[14]  Yossi Azar,et al.  The Price of Routing Unsplittable Flow , 2005, STOC '05.

[15]  L. Shapley,et al.  REGULAR ARTICLEPotential Games , 1996 .

[16]  Tim Roughgarden,et al.  How bad is selfish routing? , 2002, JACM.

[17]  Lane A. Hemaspaandra,et al.  Three hierarchies of simple games parameterized by “resource” parameters , 2013, Int. J. Game Theory.

[18]  Rolf H. Möhring,et al.  System-optimal Routing of Traffic Flows with User Constraints in Networks with Congestion System-optimal Routing of Traffic Flows with User Constraints in Networks with Congestion , 2022 .

[19]  Robert J. Aumann,et al.  16. Acceptable Points in General Cooperative n-Person Games , 1959 .

[20]  R. Rosenthal A class of games possessing pure-strategy Nash equilibria , 1973 .

[21]  Elias Koutsoupias,et al.  The price of anarchy of finite congestion games , 2005, STOC '05.

[22]  Tim Roughgarden,et al.  Bounding the inefficiency of equilibria in nonatomic congestion games , 2004, Games Econ. Behav..

[23]  Moshe Tennenholtz,et al.  Congestion games with failures , 2005, EC '05.

[24]  Moshe Tennenholtz,et al.  Congestion games with load-dependent failures: Identical resources , 2009, Games Econ. Behav..

[25]  Christos H. Papadimitriou,et al.  Algorithms, games, and the internet , 2001, STOC '01.

[26]  Moshe Tennenholtz,et al.  Taxed congestion games with failures , 2009, Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence.

[27]  Christos H. Papadimitriou,et al.  Worst-case equilibria , 1999 .

[28]  M. Whinston,et al.  Coalition-Proof Nash Equilibria II. Applications , 1987 .