Remote monitoring and prognosis of fatigue cracking in steel bridges with acoustic emission

Acoustic emission (AE) monitoring is desirable to nondestructively detect fatigue damage in steel bridges. Investigations of the relationship between AE signals and crack growth behavior are of paramount importance prior to the widespread application of passive piezoelectric sensing for monitoring of fatigue crack propagation in steel bridges. Tests have been performed to detect AE from fatigue cracks in A572G50 steel. Noise induced AE signals were filtered based on friction emission tests, loading pattern, and a combined approach involving Swansong II filters and investigation of waveforms. The filtering methods based on friction emission tests and load pattern are of interest to the field evaluation using sparse datasets. The combined approach is suitable for data filtering and interpretation of actual field tests. The pattern recognition program NOESIS (Envirocoustics) was utilized for the evaluation of AE data quality. AE parameters are associated with crack length, crack growth rate, maximum stress intensity and stress intensity range. It is shown that AE hits, counts, absolute energy, and signal strength are able to provide warnings at the critical cracking level where cracking progresses from stage II (stable propagation) to stage III (unstable propagation which may result in failure). Absolute energy rate and signal strength rate may be better than count rate to assess the remaining fatigue life of inservice steel bridges.

[1]  D. C. Connors,et al.  Acoustic emission analysis during fatigue crack growth in steel , 1977 .

[2]  K. Sadananda,et al.  Short crack growth and internal stresses , 1997 .

[3]  M. N. Bassim,et al.  Acoustic emission mechanisms during high-cycle fatigue , 1981 .

[4]  Jonathan Awerbuch,et al.  Acoustic emission during fatigue of Ti-6Al-4V: Incipient fatigue crack detection limits and generalized data analysis methodology , 1992 .

[5]  C. E. Richards,et al.  Acoustic emission monitoring of fatigue crack growth , 1978 .

[6]  C. G. Sifniotopoulos,et al.  Acoustic Emission Monitoring of Fatigue Damage in Metals , 1998 .

[7]  M. N. Bassim,et al.  Detection of the onset of fatigue crack growth in rail steels using acoustic emission , 1994 .

[8]  Isaac M Daniel,et al.  Analysis of acoustic emission waveforms from propagating fatigue crack , 2000 .

[9]  Kyung Seop Han,et al.  Acoustic Emission Behavior during Fatigue Crack Propagation in 304 Stainless Steel , 2003 .

[10]  Hung-Liang Chen,et al.  Acoustic Emission Study of Fatigue Cracks in Materials Used for AVLB , 2004 .

[11]  Z. Gong,et al.  ACOUSTIC EMISSION MONITORING OF STEEL RAILROAD BRIDGES , 1992 .

[12]  Victor Giurgiutiu,et al.  Quantification of fatigue cracking in CT specimens with passive and active piezoelectric sensing , 2010, Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[13]  T. J. Fowler,et al.  The MONPAC system , 1989 .

[14]  Daining Fang,et al.  Study of fatigue crack characteristics by acoustic emission , 1995 .

[15]  Paul Ziehl Applications of acoustic emission evaluation for civil infrastructure , 2008, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[16]  R. Stephens,et al.  Constant and variable amplitude fatigue behavior and fracture of A572 steel at 25°C(77°F) and −45°C(−50°F) , 1982 .

[17]  Christopher A. Martin,et al.  Acoustic emission testing on an F/A-18 E/F titanium bulkhead , 1995, Smart Structures.

[18]  Paul Ziehl,et al.  Design and Field Evaluation of Hybrid FRP/Reinforced Concrete Superstructure System , 2009 .

[19]  Marvin A. Hamstad,et al.  Wideband and narrowband acoustic emission waveforms from extraneous sources during fatigue of steel samples , 1997 .

[20]  H. L. Dunegan,et al.  Continuous monitoring of fatigue-crack growth by acoustic-emission techniques , 1974 .

[21]  A. K. Vasudevan,et al.  Analysis of fatigue crack growth under compression–compression loading , 2001 .

[22]  Karen Margaret Holford,et al.  Modal Analysis of Acoustic Emission Signals from Artificial and Fatigue Crack Sources in Aerospace Grade Steel , 2005 .

[23]  T. M. Roberts,et al.  Fatigue life prediction based on crack propagation and acoustic emission count rates , 2003 .