Perceptions of information literacy competencies among future psychology professionals: a comparative study in Spain and Portugal

PurposeThe aim of the study is to analyze the perceptions of belief-in-importance (BI), self-efficacy (SE) and preferred source of learning (SL) of information literacy (IL) competencies among psychology students in Spain and Portugal.Design/methodology/approachUnified protocol was based on the questionnaire IL-HUMASS (26 items). Quantitative diagnostic-comparative study was carried out, including factor and variance analysis. Hypothesis compliance was checked.FindingsBy country, there are no significant differences in students' perceptions, although the scores in BI are higher than in SE. By category, there are some significant differences, and the least valued is that of processing. By individual competency, seven of them show differences between countries. Learning preferences are for a mix of classroom and autonomous learning. Students barely realize the value of libraries. Within factor structures, which share the same components in each dimension, some emerging factors do appear.Practical implicationsMotivation (BI and SE) with respect to IL competencies is a key asset for future psychologists. Interest should focus on some emerging motivational factors. Students' appreciation of the library should enhance through the corresponding initiatives for improvement. This method could be complemented by qualitative studies.Originality/valueThis is probably the first diagnostic-comparative study on perceptions of IL competencies among future psychology professionals.

[1]  Hans De Witte,et al.  Capturing autonomy, competence, and relatedness at work: Construction and initial validation of the Work‐related Basic Need Satisfaction scale , 2010 .

[2]  María Rosaura José A. Aurora Ximo Susana David Carmen Ro Pinto,et al.  Attitudes toward Information Competency of University Students in Social Sciences , 2016 .

[3]  Louise Limberg,et al.  What Matters? Shaping Meaningful Learning through Teaching Information Literacy , 2007 .

[4]  K. Tuominen,et al.  Information Literacy as a Sociotechnical Practice1 , 2005, The Library Quarterly.

[5]  P. Pintrich.  A Motivational Science Perspective on the Role of Student Motivation in Learning and Teaching Contexts. , 2003 .

[6]  Stephen “Mike” Natalie Catherine Kiel,et al.  Learning by Doing: Developing a Baseline Information Literacy Assessment , 2015 .

[7]  Sharon A. Weiner,et al.  The rescinding of the ACRL 2000 Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education—Really?? , 2017 .

[8]  Meredith Farkas.  Participatory technologies, pedagogy 2.0 and information literacy , 2012, Libr. Hi Tech.

[9]  B. Spehar,et al.  Helping First Year Students Think Like Psychologists: Supporting Information Literacy and Teamwork Skill Development , 2008 .

[10]  Francisco-Javier García Marco,et al.  Self-learning of Information Literacy Competencies in Higher Education: The Perspective of Social Sciences Students , 2019, Coll. Res. Libr..

[11]  Lih-Juan ChanLin.  Development of a Competency Questionnaire for LIS Undergraduates at Fu-Jen Catholic University , 2009 .

[12]  Christopher Chan.  Institutional assessment of student information literacy ability: A case study , 2016 .

[13]  H. Perkins,et al.  Academic motivation and information literacy self-efficacy: The importance of a simple desire to know , 2016 .

[14]  Louise Limberg.  Informing information literacy education through empirical research , 2005 .

[15]  Saskia Brand-Gruwel,et al.  Reliability and validity test of a Scoring Rubric for Information Literacy , 2017, J. Documentation.

[16]  C. Maybee.  Undergraduate Perceptions of Information Use: The Basis for Creating User-Centered Student Information Literacy Instruction , 2006 .

[17]  Serap Kurbanoglu,et al.  Developing the information literacy self-efficacy scale , 2006, J. Documentation.

[18]  Christopher P. Niemiec,et al.  Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom , 2009 .

[19]  A. Grafstein.  A discipline-based approach to information literacy , 2002 .

[20]  Thomas P. Mackey,et al.  Implementing a convergent model for information literacy: combining research and web literacy , 2005, J. Inf. Sci..

[21]  María Pinto,et al.  Gender perspective on information literacy: An interdisciplinary and multidimensional analysis within higher education settings , 2019, Library & Information Science Research.

[22]  A. Bandura.  Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychological review.

[23]  An Gie Yong,et al.  A Beginner's Guide to Factor Analysis: Focusing on Exploratory Factor Analysis , 2013 .

[24]  Alice Schmidt Hanbidge,et al.  Information literacy skills on the go , 2018, Journal of Information Literacy.

[25]  Sheila Corrall,et al.  Benchmarking strategic engagement with information literacy in higher education: towards a working model , 2007, Inf. Res..

[26]  S. Webber.  Working towards the Information Literate University , 2006 .

[27]  Benjamin R. Harris,et al.  Reflective assessment: opportunities and challenges , 2016 .

[28]  C. Belar.  Advancing the culture of competence. , 2009 .

[29]  Carl J. Huberty,et al.  Statistical Practices of Educational Researchers: An Analysis of their ANOVA, MANOVA, and ANCOVA Analyses , 1998 .

[30]  Serap Kurbanoglu,et al.  Self-efficacy: a concept closely linked to information literacy and lifelong learning , 2003, J. Documentation.

[31]  A. Head.  Information Literacy from the Trenches: How Do Humanities and Social Science Majors Conduct Academic Research? , 2008 .

[32]  J. Daniluk,et al.  The process of becoming a supervisor for students in a doctoral supervision training course. , 2009 .

[33]  Maria Pinto,et al.  Design of the IL-HUMASS survey on information literacy in higher education: A self-assessment approach , 2010, J. Inf. Sci..

[34]  A Collaborative Project to Integrate Information Literacy Skills into an Undergraduate Psychology Course , 2013 .

[35]  Menucha Birenbaum,et al.  Who Prefers What? Disciplinary Differences in Students' Preferred Approaches to Teaching and Learning Styles , 2000 .

[36]  A. Furnham,et al.  Further Tests of Belief-Importance Theory , 2015, PloS one.

[37]  Maria Pinto,et al.  Exploring LIS Students' Beliefs in Importance and Self-Efficacy of Core Information Literacy Competencies , 2016, Coll. Res. Libr..

[38]  Maria Pinto,et al.  Communication of information in the digital age among social sciences students: Uncovering a synthetic indicator of performance , 2018, Aslib J. Inf. Manag..

[39]  J. Bouchaud,et al.  Why Do Markets Crash? Bitcoin Data Offers Unprecedented Insights , 2015, PloS one.

[40]  Jennifer Brown.  Interviews, focus groups, and Delphi techniques , 2018, Advanced Research Methods for Applied Psychology.

[41]  N. Kaslow.  Competencies in professional psychology. , 2004, The American psychologist.

[42]  L. Cronbach,et al.  Construct validity in psychological tests. , 1955, Psychological bulletin.

[43]  Günter Krampen,et al.  Conceptions of scientific knowledge influence learning of academic skills: epistemic beliefs and the efficacy of information literacy instruction , 2018 .

[44]  Autoevaluación de la competencia informacional en los estudios de psicología desde la percepción del estudiante , 2012 .

[45]  G. Wulf,et al.  Optimizing performance through intrinsic motivation and attention for learning: The OPTIMAL theory of motor learning , 2016, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[46]  Sabine Seufert,et al.  Towards Modeling and Measuring Information Literacy in Secondary Education , 2015, ICIS.

[47]  H. A. Pines,et al.  Developing Information Literacy and Research Skills in Introductory Psychology: A Case Study. , 2005 .

[48]  Serap Kurbanoğlu,et al.  Self-Efficacy: An Alternative Approach to the Evaluation of Information Literacy , 2010 .