Designing for justice in electricity systems: A comparison of smart grid experiments in the Netherlands

Abstract In future urban energy systems, smart grid systems will be crucial for the integration of renewable energy. However, their deployment has moral implications, for example regarding data privacy, user autonomy, or distribution of responsibilities. ‘Energy justice’ is one of the most comprehensive frameworks to address these implications, but remains limited regarding smart grids, and regarding concrete guidelines for designers and policymakers. In this paper, we fill this gap by answering the following research question: How do design choices in smart grid projects impact energy justice? Thereby, four smart grid pilot projects are evaluated in a comparative qualitative case study research design. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews and a content analysis. Our findings contribute to the energy justice literature with insights regarding the design for distributive, recognition, and procedural justice. They underscore the importance of fairness in data governance, participatory design, user control and autonomy, technology inclusiveness, and the design for expansion and replication. Future research should explore the feasibility to govern smart grids as commons and the relationship between trust and perceptions of justice. We conclude with policy recommendations for funding future smart grid experiments and for facilitating the implementation of storage through electricity sector regulation.

[1]  David Bidwell,et al.  Thinking through participation in renewable energy decisions , 2016, Nature Energy.

[2]  Gordon Walker,et al.  Beyond Distribution and Proximity: Exploring the Multiple Spatialities of Environmental Justice , 2009 .

[3]  Jccm Boukje Huijben,et al.  Breakthrough without subsidies? PV business model experiments in the Netherlands , 2013 .

[4]  Till Bunsen,et al.  Facilitating energy transition through energy commons: An application of socio-ecological systems framework for integrated community energy systems , 2018 .

[5]  Andy P. Field,et al.  Discovering Statistics Using SPSS , 2000 .

[6]  Carolyn Snell,et al.  Advancing an energy justice perspective of fuel poverty: Household vulnerability and domestic retrofit policy in the United Kingdom , 2017 .

[7]  R. Künneke,et al.  Moral Values as Factors for Social Acceptance of Smart Grid Technologies , 2018, Sustainability.

[8]  Benjamin K. Sovacool,et al.  Energy Justice: Conceptual Insights and Practical Applications , 2015 .

[9]  Andrew Karvonen,et al.  Smart and sustainable? Five tensions in the visions and practices of the smart-sustainable city in Europe and North America , 2018, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[10]  Charlie Wilson,et al.  Smart homes and their users: a systematic analysis and key challenges , 2014, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[11]  H. Boudet,et al.  Public perceptions of and responses to new energy technologies , 2019, Nature Energy.

[12]  Ettore Francesco Bompard,et al.  Market and regulatory factors influencing smart-grid investment in Europe: Evidence from pilot projects and implications for reform , 2016 .

[13]  Bert Willems,et al.  The Dutch retail electricity market , 2019, Energy Policy.

[14]  E. Rogers.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[15]  Alister Forman.  Energy justice at the end of the wire: Enacting community energy and equity in Wales , 2017 .

[16]  Benjamin Sovacool,et al.  Electricity market design for the prosumer era , 2016, Nature Energy.

[17]  Michael J. Fell,et al.  Flexibility capital and flexibility justice in smart energy systems , 2019, Energy Research & Social Science.

[18]  Jeremy V. Pitt,et al.  Collective attention and active consumer participation in community energy systems , 2018, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[19]  R. Fisher.  Social Desirability Bias and the Validity of Indirect Questioning , 1993 .

[20]  Frank Hindriks,et al.  Assessing fairness of dynamic grid tariffs , 2017 .

[21]  Riccardo Russo,et al.  The British public’s perception of the UK smart metering initiative: Threats and opportunities , 2016 .

[22]  Sara Renström,et al.  Supporting diverse roles for people in smart energy systems , 2019, Energy Research & Social Science.

[23]  Sherilyn MacGregor,et al.  Big society, little justice? Community renewable energy and the politics of localism , 2014 .

[24]  Henner Busch,et al.  ‘Successful’ low-carbon energy transitions at the community level? An energy justice perspective , 2018 .

[25]  Darren McCauley,et al.  Advancing energy justice: The triumvirate of tenets , 2013 .

[26]  Ray Galvin,et al.  “Let justice roll down like waters”: Reconnecting energy justice to its roots in the civil rights movement , 2020, Energy Research & Social Science.

[27]  Roger D. Congleton.  Elinor Ostrom, Understanding Institutional Diversity , 2007 .

[28]  W. Fichtner,et al.  Smart Homes as a Means to Sustainable Energy Consumption: A Study of Consumer Perceptions , 2012 .

[29]  Susana Guerreiro,et al.  Making energy visible: sociopsychological aspects associated with the use of smart meters , 2015 .

[30]  D. Schlosberg.  Defining environmental justice : theories, movements, and nature , 2007 .

[31]  E. Ostrom.  Understanding Institutional Diversity , 2005 .

[32]  S.A.R. Mir Mohammadi Kooshknow,et al.  Business models design space for electricity storage systems: Case study of the Netherlands , 2018, Journal of Energy Storage.

[33]  Clark A. Miller,et al.  The Social Dimensions of Energy Transitions , 2013 .

[34]  Johannes Euler,et al.  Conceptualizing the Commons: Moving Beyond the Goods-based Definition by Introducing the Social Practices of Commoning as Vital Determinant , 2018 .

[35]  P. Warren.  A review of demand-side management policy in the UK , 2014 .

[36]  B. Kalkbrenner.  Residential vs. community battery storage systems – Consumer preferences in Germany , 2019, Energy Policy.

[37]  Anna J. Wieczorek,et al.  The promise of peer-to-peer trading? The potential impact of blockchain on the actor configuration in the Dutch electricity system , 2019, Energy Research & Social Science.

[38]  Laurence Ashworth,et al.  Marketing Dataveillance and Digital Privacy: Using Theories of Justice to Understand Consumers’ Online Privacy Concerns , 2006 .

[39]  Gillian Irene Bristow,et al.  Acceptance, acceptability and environmental justice: the role of community benefits in wind energy development , 2011 .

[40]  Enda T. Hayes,et al.  Enhancing the communication potential of smart metering for energy and water , 2019, Utilities Policy.

[41]  Rafaela Hillerbrand,et al.  Energy Justice and Smart Grid Systems: Evidence from the Netherlands and the United Kingdom , 2018, Applied Energy.

[42]  Paula Hansen,et al.  Smart technology needs smarter management: Disentangling the dynamics of digitalism in the governance of shared solar energy in Australia , 2020 .

[43]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[44]  G. Verbong,et al.  Smart grids or smart users? Involving users in developing a low carbon electricity economy , 2013 .

[45]  Benjamin K. Sovacool,et al.  Further reflections on vulnerability and resistance in the United Kingdom's smart meter transition , 2017, Energy Policy.

[46]  Lea Diestelmeier.  Unlocking Flexibility with Law : developing a Legal Framework for Smart Electricity Systems , 2019 .

[47]  Antony Unwin,et al.  Discovering Statistics Using R by Andy Field, Jeremy Miles, Zoë Field , 2013 .

[48]  Tetsuo Tezuka,et al.  Proposing an evaluation framework for energy policy making incorporating equity: Applications in Australia , 2016 .

[49]  B. Flyvbjerg.  Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research , 2006, 1304.1186.

[50]  Christopher L. Ambrey,et al.  Densification, what does it mean for fuel poverty and energy justice? An empirical analysis , 2018, Energy Policy.

[51]  Bert-Jaap Koops,et al.  Smart Metering and Privacy in Europe: Lessons from the Dutch Case , 2013, European Data Protection.

[52]  Rolf Wüstenhagen,et al.  The flexible prosumer: Measuring the willingness to co-create distributed flexibility , 2018 .

[53]  L. Kool,et al.  Urgent upgrade: protect public values in our digitized society , 2017 .

[54]  Robert Folger,et al.  Distributive and procedural justice in the workplace , 1987 .

[55]  Lea Diestelmeier,et al.  Changing power: Shifting the role of electricity consumers with blockchain technology – Policy implications for EU electricity law , 2019, Energy Policy.

[56]  David Bidwell,et al.  Chains of trust: Energy justice, public engagement, and the first offshore wind farm in the United States , 2019, Energy Research & Social Science.

[57]  Cherrelle Eid,et al.  Towards the design of flexibility management in smart grids : A techno-institutional perspective , 2017 .

[58]  Harriet Bulkeley,et al.  Contesting climate justice in the city: Examining politics and practice in urban climate change experiments , 2014 .

[59]  van Lfm Luc Summeren,et al.  Institutional ‘lock-out’ towards local self-governance? Environmental justice and sustainable transformations in Dutch social housing neighbourhoods , 2017 .

[60]  Peter M. Connor,et al.  The Socio-Economic Challenges of Smart Grids , 2019, Pathways to a Smarter Power System.

[61]  Angelina H.M.E. Reinders,et al.  Empowering the end-user in smart grids: Recommendations for the design of products and services , 2013 .

[62]  Kirsten E H Jenkins,et al.  Energy justice : a conceptual review , 2016 .

[63]  Michiel A. Heldeweg,et al.  Smart design rules for smart grids: analysing local smart grid development through an empirico-legal institutional lens , 2016 .

[64]  Kirsten Jenkins,et al.  Setting energy justice apart from the crowd: Lessons from environmental and climate justice , 2018 .

[65]  Kate Burningham,et al.  The electric commons: A qualitative study of community accountability , 2017 .

[66]  Tom Rodden,et al.  Smart grids, smart users? The role of the user in demand side management , 2014 .

[67]  Edeltraud Guenther,et al.  What hampers energy system transformations? The case of smart grids , 2014 .

[68]  Sanneke Kloppenburg,et al.  Digital platforms and the future of energy provisioning: Promises and perils for the next phase of the energy transition , 2019, Energy Research & Social Science.

[69]  Linda S. G. L. Wauben,et al.  Insights from stakeholders of five residential smart grid pilot projects in the Netherlands , 2016 .