Why different trust relationships matter for information systems users

Technology acceptance research has shown that trust is an important factor fostering use of information systems (IS). As a result, numerous IS researchers have studied factors that build trust in IS. However, IS research on trust has mainly focused on the trust relationship between the user and the IS itself, largely neglecting that other targets of trust might also drive IS use from a user’s point of view. Accordingly, we investigate the importance of different targets of trust in IS use. Therefore, we use the concept of a network of trust and identify four different targets of trust that are prevalent from a user’s point of view. Afterwards, we develop our research model and evaluate it using a free simulation experiment. The results show that multiple targets of trust are important in the context of IS use. In particular, we highlight the importance of a second target – trust in the provider – which is equally important as trust in the IS itself. Consequently, IS providers should focus not only on fostering users’ trust in their IS but also on positioning themselves as trustworthy providers. In addition, we show that a third target – trust in the Internet – has significant indirect effects on multiple constructs that impact IS use.

[1]  Jan Marco Leimeister,et al.  Understanding the Formation of Trust , 2014, Socio-technical Design of Ubiquitous Computing Systems.

[2]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Building Effective Online Marketplaces with Institution-Based Trust , 2004, Inf. Syst. Res..

[3]  Judy A. Siguaw,et al.  Formative versus Reflective Indicators in Organizational Measure Development: A Comparison and Empirical Illustration , 2006 .

[4]  Jason Bennett Thatcher,et al.  Trust in a specific technology: An investigation of its components and measures , 2011, TMIS.

[5]  Frank Bannister,et al.  Consumer trust in Internet shopping in Ireland: towards the development of a more effective trust measurement instrument , 2007, J. Inf. Technol..

[6]  J. Lewis,et al.  Trust as a Social Reality , 1985 .

[7]  CyrDianne,et al.  Exploring human images in website design , 2009 .

[8]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust , 1995 .

[9]  M. Holbrook,et al.  The Chain of Effects from Brand Trust and Brand Affect to Brand Performance: The Role of Brand Loyalty , 2001 .

[10]  L. Zucker Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure, 1840–1920. , 1986 .

[11]  Marcel Creemers,et al.  Understanding online purchase intentions: contributions from technology and trust perspectives , 2003, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[12]  Sarah Spiekermann,et al.  Online social networks: why we disclose , 2010, J. Inf. Technol..

[13]  Bonnie M. Muir,et al.  Trust in automation. I: Theoretical issues in the study of trust and human intervention in automated systems , 1994 .

[14]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Recommendation Agents for Electronic Commerce: Effects of Explanation Facilities on Trusting Beliefs , 2007, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[15]  Paul Benjamin Lowry,et al.  Explaining and Predicting the Impact of Branding Alliances and Web Site Quality on Initial Consumer Trust of E-Commerce Web Sites , 2007, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[16]  Zhen Xiong (George) Chen,et al.  Trust as a mediator of the relationship between organizational justice and work outcomes: test of a social exchange model , 2002 .

[17]  Rajeev Sharma,et al.  Estimating the effect of common method variance: the method-method pair technique with an illustration from TAM research , 2009 .

[18]  Jan Marco Leimeister,et al.  Opening Up the Black Box – The Importance of Different Kinds of Trust in Recommender System Usage , 2012 .

[19]  GefenDavid,et al.  Trust and TAM in online shopping , 2003 .

[20]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[21]  Charles J. Kacmar,et al.  The impact of initial consumer trust on intentions to transact with a web site: a trust building model , 2002, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[22]  Cheryl Burke Jarvis,et al.  A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research , 2003 .

[23]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions , 2008, Decis. Sci..

[24]  Thomas Hess,et al.  Differential Effects of Provider Recommendations and Consumer Reviews in E-Commerce Transactions: An Experimental Study , 2012, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[25]  D. Cremer,et al.  Perceived Support as a Mediator of the Relationship Between Justice and Trust , 2006 .

[26]  N. L. Chervany,et al.  Initial Trust Formation in New Organizational Relationships , 1998 .

[27]  Tom L. Roberts,et al.  Proposing the online community self-disclosure model: the case of working professionals in France and the U.K. who use online communities , 2010, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[28]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research , 2014 .

[29]  Wynne W. Chin The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. , 1998 .

[30]  D. Straub,et al.  Editor's comments: a critical look at the use of PLS-SEM in MIS quarterly , 2012 .

[31]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model , 2003, MIS Q..

[32]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View Of Trust , 1998 .

[33]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Inexperience and experience with online stores: the importance of TAM and trust , 2003, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[34]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  On value and value co-creation: A service systems and service logic perspective , 2008 .

[35]  Joon Koh,et al.  A Comparison of Online Trust Building Factors between Potential Customers and Repeat Customers , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[36]  Shahper Vodanovich,et al.  Research Commentary - Digital Natives and Ubiquitous Information Systems , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[37]  N. Luhmann Trust and Power , 1979 .

[38]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  The Boundaries of Trust and Risk: The Quadratic Moderating Role of Institutional Structures , 2012, Inf. Syst. Res..

[39]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Evidence of the Effect of Trust Building Technology in Electronic Markets: Price Premiums and Buyer Behavior , 2002, MIS Q..

[40]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  A Research Agenda for Trust in Online Environments , 2008, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[41]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Specifying Formative Constructs in Information Systems Research , 2007, MIS Q..

[42]  Alexander Benlian,et al.  Is traditional, open-source, or on-demand first choice? Developing an AHP-based framework for the comparison of different software models in office suites selection , 2011, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[43]  GefenDavid,et al.  Building Effective Online Marketplaces with Institution-Based Trust , 2004 .

[44]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Understanding Trust in IT Artifacts – A New Conceptual Approach , 2013 .

[45]  Jan Marco Leimeister,et al.  Dienstleistungsengineering und -management , 2012 .

[46]  Yulin Fang,et al.  Understanding online customer repurchasing intention and the mediating role of trust – an empirical investigation in two developed countries , 2009, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[47]  Naresh K. Malhotra,et al.  Internet Users' Information Privacy Concerns (IUIPC): The Construct, the Scale, and a Causal Model , 2004, Inf. Syst. Res..

[48]  R. Lewicki,et al.  Developing and Maintaining Trust in Work Relationships , 1996 .

[49]  Marios Koufaris,et al.  The development of initial trust in an online company by new customers , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[50]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[51]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[52]  Ronald T. Cenfetelli,et al.  Interpretation of Formative Measurement in Information Systems Research , 2009, MIS Q..

[53]  H. Liao,et al.  The impact of justice climate and justice orientation on work outcomes: a cross-level multifoci framework. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[54]  Milena M. Head,et al.  Exploring human images in website design: a multi-method approach , 2009 .

[55]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research , 2012 .

[56]  A. Milton Jenkins,et al.  RESEARCH METHDOLOGIES AND MIS RESEARCH , 2000 .

[57]  Pratim Datta,et al.  The economics and psychology of consumer trust in intermediaries in electronic markets: the EM-Trust Framework , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[58]  J. G. Holmes,et al.  Trust in close relationships. , 1985 .

[59]  Charles J. Kacmar,et al.  Developing and Validating Trust Measures for e-Commerce: An Integrative Typology , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[60]  Ana Ortiz de Guinea,et al.  Why break the habit of a lifetime? rethinking the roles of intention, habit, and emotion in continuing information technology use , 2009 .

[61]  BenbasatIzak,et al.  The effects of personalizaion and familiarity on trust and adoption of recommendation agents , 2006 .

[62]  Michael Bächle,et al.  Einführung in die Wirtschaftsinformatik , 2012 .

[63]  Angelika Dimoka,et al.  The Nature and Role of Feedback Text Comments in Online Marketplaces: Implications for Trust Building, Price Premiums, and Seller Differentiation , 2006, Inf. Syst. Res..

[64]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Interactive Decision Aids for Consumer Decision Making in E-Commerce: The Influence of Perceived Strategy Restrictiveness , 2009, MIS Q..

[65]  Moez Limayem,et al.  How Habit Limits the Predictive Power of Intention: The Case of Information Systems Continuance , 2007, MIS Q..

[66]  Rüdiger Zarnekow,et al.  User, Use & Utility Research , 2014, Business & Information Systems Engineering.

[67]  Li Jiang,et al.  Trust and Electronic Government Success: An Empirical Study , 2008, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[68]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Examining Trust in Information Technology Artifacts: The Effects of System Quality and Culture , 2008, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[69]  M. Gordon,et al.  The “Science of the Sophomore” Revisited: from Conjecture to Empiricism , 1986 .

[70]  J. Leimeister,et al.  What We Really Know About Antecedents of Trust: A Critical Review of the Empirical Information Systems Literature on Trust , 2013 .

[71]  D. Gefen,et al.  E-commerce: the role of familiarity and trust , 2000 .

[72]  Thomas Hess,et al.  Service Quality in Software-as-a-Service: Developing the SaaS-Qual Measure and Examining Its Role in Usage Continuance , 2011, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[73]  Stephen Hailes,et al.  Supporting trust in virtual communities , 2000, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[74]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[75]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[76]  John D. Lee,et al.  Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[77]  Morris B. Holbrook,et al.  Product-class effects on brand commitment and brand outcomes: The role of brand trust and brand affect , 2002 .

[78]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Trust In and Adoption of Online Recommendation Agents , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[79]  Jan Marco Leimeister,et al.  Understanding the Formation of Trust in IT Artifacts , 2012, ICIS.

[80]  Paul D. Johnson,et al.  Organizational Justice, Trustworthiness, and Trust: A Multifoci Examination , 2010 .

[81]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  Structural equation modeling analysis with small samples using partial least squares , 1999 .

[82]  Straub,et al.  Editor's Comments: An Update and Extension to SEM Guidelines for Administrative and Social Science Research , 2011 .