E-Loyalty Networks in Online Auctions

Creating a loyal customer base is one of the most important, and at the same time, most difficult tasks a company faces. Creating loyalty online (e-loyalty) is especially difficult since customers can ``switch'' to a competitor with the click of a mouse. In this paper we investigate e-loyalty in online auctions. Using a unique data set of over 30,000 auctions from one of the main consumer-to-consumer online auction houses, we propose a novel measure of e-loyalty via the associated network of transactions between bidders and sellers. Using a bipartite network of bidder and seller nodes, two nodes are linked when a bidder purchases from a seller and the number of repeat-purchases determines the strength of that link. We employ ideas from functional principal component analysis to derive, from this network, the loyalty distribution which measures the perceived loyalty of every individual seller, and associated loyalty scores which summarize this distribution in a parsimonious way. We then investigate the effect of loyalty on the outcome of an auction. In doing so, we are confronted with several statistical challenges in that standard statistical models lead to a misrepresentation of the data and a violation of the model assumptions. The reason is that loyalty networks result in an extreme clustering of the data, with few high-volume sellers accounting for most of the individual transactions. We investigate several remedies to the clustering problem and conclude that loyalty networks consist of very distinct segments that can best be understood individually.

[1]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Evidence of the Effect of Trust Building Technology in Electronic Markets: Price Premiums and Buyer Behavior , 2002, MIS Q..

[2]  Wolfgang Jank,et al.  Modeling Concurrency of Events in Online Auctions via Spatio-Temporal Semiparametric Models , 2005 .

[3]  J. Livingston How Valuable Is a Good Reputation? A Sample Selection Model of Internet Auctions , 2005, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[4]  J. Booth,et al.  2. Random-Effects Modeling of Categorical Response Data , 2000 .

[5]  Wolfgang Jank,et al.  Consumer surplus in online auctions , 2008 .

[6]  K. J. Utikal,et al.  Inference for Density Families Using Functional Principal Component Analysis , 2001 .

[7]  Peter C. Verhoef,et al.  Predicting Customer Lifetime Value in Multi-Service Industries , 2003 .

[8]  Sandy D. Jap,et al.  Competition between auctions , 2008 .

[9]  B. Silverman,et al.  Functional Data Analysis , 1997 .

[10]  Ali Hortaçsu,et al.  Economic Insights from Internet Auctions , 2004 .

[11]  Peter S. Fader,et al.  Clv: More than Meets the Eye , 2006 .

[12]  J. Morgan,et al.  Reputation in Online Auctions: The Market for Trust , 2006 .

[13]  Peter S. Fader,et al.  How to project customer retention , 2007 .

[14]  David H. Reiley,et al.  Pennies from Ebay: The Determinants of Price in Online Auctions , 2000 .

[15]  Wolfgang Jank,et al.  The Long Tail is Longer than You Think: The Surprisingly Large Extent of Online Sales by Small Volume Sellers , 2008 .

[16]  Mayukh Dass,et al.  Modeling On-Line Art Auction Dynamics Using Functional Data Analysis , 2006, math/0609292.

[17]  Wolfgang Jank,et al.  An Automated and Data-Driven Bidding Strategy for Online Auctions , 2011, INFORMS J. Comput..