Variational assimilation of streamflow into operational distributed hydrologic models: effect of spatiotemporal scale of adjustment

State updating of distributed rainfall-runoff models via streamflow assimilation is subject to overfitting because large dimensionality of the state space of the model may render the assimilation problem seriously underdetermined. To examine the issue in the context of operational hydrologic forecasting, we carried out a set of real-world experiments in which streamflow data is assimilated into the gridded Sacramento Soil Moisture Accounting (SAC-SMA) and kinematic-wave routing models of the US National Weather Service (NWS) Research Distributed Hydrologic Model (RDHM) via variational data assimilation (DA). The nine study basins include four in Oklahoma and five in Texas. To assess the sensitivity of the performance of DA to the dimensionality of the control vector, we used nine different spatiotemporal adjustment scales, with which the state variables are adjusted in a lumped, semi-distributed, or distributed fashion and biases in precipitation and PE are adjusted at hourly or 6-hourly scale, or at the scale of the fast response of the basin. For each adjustment scale, three different assimilation scenarios were carried out in which streamflow observations are assumed to be available at basin interior points only, at the basin outlet only, or at all locations. The results for the nine basins show that the optimum spatiotemporal adjustment scale varies from basin to basin and between streamflow analysis and prediction for all three streamflow assimilation scenarios. The most preferred adjustment scale for seven out of the nine basins is found to be distributed and hourly. It was found that basins with highly correlated flows between interior and outlet locations tend to be less sensitive to the adjustment scale and could benefit more from streamflow assimilation. In comparison with outlet flow assimilation, interior flow assimilation produced streamflow predictions whose spatial correlation structure is more consistent with that of observed flow for all adjustment scales. We also describe diagnosing the complexity of the assimilation problem using spatial correlation of streamflow and discuss the effect of timing errors in hydrograph simulation on the performance of the DA procedure.

[1]  G. Holland,et al.  Tropical cyclones and climate change , 2010, Tropical Cyclone Research and Review.

[2]  M. Zupanski Maximum Likelihood Ensemble Filter: Theoretical Aspects , 2005 .

[3]  Dong-Jun Seo,et al.  Real-Time Variational Assimilation of Hydrologic and Hydrometeorological Data into Operational Hydrologic Forecasting , 2003 .

[4]  Dong-Jun Seo,et al.  The WSR-88D rainfall algorithm , 1998 .

[5]  H. Moradkhani Hydrologic Remote Sensing and Land Surface Data Assimilation , 2008, Sensors.

[6]  J. M. Lewis,et al.  Dynamic Data Assimilation: A Least Squares Approach , 2006 .

[7]  Victor Koren,et al.  Use of Soil Property Data in the Derivation of Conceptual Rainfall-Runoff Model Parameters , 2000 .

[8]  Dong-Jun Seo,et al.  The distributed model intercomparison project (DMIP): Motivation and experiment design , 2004 .

[9]  Wade T. Crow,et al.  Improving hydrologic predictions of a catchment model via assimilation of surface soil moisture , 2011 .

[10]  D. Zupanski A General Weak Constraint Applicable to Operational 4DVAR Data Assimilation Systems , 1997 .

[11]  D. Maidment,et al.  Coordinate Transformations for Using NEXRAD Data in GIS-Based Hydrologic Modeling , 1999 .

[12]  R. Stouffer,et al.  Stationarity Is Dead: Whither Water Management? , 2008, Science.

[13]  Gabrielle De Lannoy,et al.  Improvement of modeled soil wetness conditions and turbulent fluxes through the assimilation of observed discharge , 2006 .

[14]  A. Weerts,et al.  Particle filtering and ensemble Kalman filtering for state updating with hydrological conceptual rainfall‐runoff models , 2006 .

[15]  C. Torrence,et al.  A Practical Guide to Wavelet Analysis. , 1998 .

[16]  K. Trenberth,et al.  The changing character of precipitation , 2003 .

[17]  Peter A. Troch,et al.  Catchment-scale hydrological modeling and data assimilation , 2003 .

[18]  H. Gupta,et al.  Real-Time Data Assimilation for Operational Ensemble Streamflow Forecasting , 2006 .

[19]  C. Diks,et al.  Improved treatment of uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: Combining the strengths of global optimization and data assimilation , 2005 .

[20]  Baxter E. Vieux,et al.  Distributed Hydrologic Modeling Using GIS , 2001 .

[21]  Xiaolei Zou,et al.  Examination of Numerical Results from Tangent Linear and Adjoint of Discontinuous Nonlinear Models , 2001 .

[22]  D. Aubert,et al.  Sequential assimilation of soil moisture and streamflow data in a conceptual rainfall-runoff model , 2003 .

[23]  D. Pham Stochastic Methods for Sequential Data Assimilation in Strongly Nonlinear Systems , 2001 .

[24]  A. H. Murphy,et al.  General Decompositions of MSE-Based Skill Scores: Measures of Some Basic Aspects of Forecast Quality , 1996 .

[25]  R. Ibbitt,et al.  Hydrological data assimilation with the ensemble Kalman filter: Use of streamflow observations to update states in a distributed hydrological model , 2007 .

[26]  Seann Reed,et al.  Deriving flow directions for coarse‐resolution (1–4 km) gridded hydrologic modeling , 2003 .

[27]  Yuqiong Liu,et al.  A wavelet-based approach to assessing timing errors in hydrologic predictions , 2011 .

[28]  Peter A. Troch,et al.  Tikhonov regularization as a tool for assimilating soil moisture data in distributed hydrological models , 2002 .

[29]  Michael Smith,et al.  Hydrology laboratory research modeling system (HL-RMS) of the US national weather service , 2004 .

[30]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical Recipes in Fortran 77: The Art of Scientific Computing 2nd Editionn - Volume 1 of Fortran Numerical Recipes , 1992 .

[31]  Dong Jun Seo,et al.  Automatic state updating for operational streamflow forecasting via variational data assimilation , 2009 .

[32]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  Dual state-parameter estimation of hydrological models using ensemble Kalman filter , 2005 .

[33]  Dennis McLaughlin,et al.  An integrated approach to hydrologic data assimilation: interpolation, smoothing, and filtering , 2002 .

[34]  Roman Krzysztofowicz,et al.  Bayesian theory of probabilistic forecasting via deterministic hydrologic model , 1999 .

[35]  G. Hegerl,et al.  Human contribution to more-intense precipitation extremes , 2011, Nature.

[36]  Dong-Jun Seo,et al.  Real-time estimation of mean field bias in radar rainfall data , 1999 .

[37]  Witold F. Krajewski,et al.  Evaluating NEXRAD Multisensor Precipitation Estimates for Operational Hydrologic Forecasting , 2000 .

[38]  Arnaud Doucet,et al.  Sequential Monte Carlo Methods , 2006, Handbook of Graphical Models.

[39]  Victor Koren,et al.  Assimilation of streamflow and in situ soil moisture data into operational distributed hydrologic models: Effects of uncertainties in the data and initial model soil moisture states , 2011 .

[40]  Witold F. Krajewski,et al.  Estimation of radar-rainfall error spatial correlation , 2009 .

[41]  Dong-Jun Seo,et al.  Real-time estimation of rainfall fields using radar rainfall and rain gage data , 1998 .

[42]  Fred Liscum Effects of urban development on stormwater runoff characteristics for the Houston, Texas, metropolitan area , 2001 .

[43]  H. Gupta,et al.  Estimating the uncertain mathematical structure of a water balance model via Bayesian data assimilation , 2009 .

[44]  James D. Brown,et al.  HYDROLOGIC ENSEMBLE PREDICTION FOR RISK-BASED WATER RESOURCES MANGEMENT AND HAZARD MITIGATION , 2010 .