The Students’ Acceptability Model of the Web Based Academic Information System (SIAK)

A desirable integrated access to the information that affected to the organizations were, in facts, having the relationship with the perceptions to adopt the information system, especially that requires the technical competence and skills. This study investigated the using of Web-based academic information system to assist students in the academic activities. Specifically, on the behavior influenced to adopt the new information technology. Based on the developed information model towards academic system (Academic Information System Based on WEB, we called as SIAK), the study found that the user satisfaction (US) for academic purposes were having significant correlation with all of Net System Benefit. Here, the User Satisfaction (US) on whether happy or not towards the system is having significant correlation with all of System Quality (SQ), Attitude Towards Using (ATU), and Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU). Whiles, to the completeness of contents were having significant correlation with all of Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU) and Use Intentions (UI). This study also found that the users were very concern to the speed of information presented and provided by the system. The better quality of the academic information systems, the more satisfy the users to the information system.

[1]  Claudio Sapateiro,et al.  Aspects for Information Systems Implementation: challenges and impacts. A higher education institution experience , 2008 .

[2]  Elizabeth Anderson.  Extended value stream mapping: creating a supply chain view of phytosanitary compliance for export timber , 2017 .

[3]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[4]  William R. King,et al.  ASSESSING INFORMATION SYSTEM VALUE: AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY , 1983 .

[5]  Sherrie X. Y. Komiak,et al.  The Effects of Perceived Information Quality and Perceived System Quality on Trust and Adoption of Online Reputation Systems , 2010, AMCIS.

[6]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Beyond Accuracy: What Data Quality Means to Data Consumers , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[7]  Denham Phipps,et al.  Understanding the implementation and adoption of an information technology intervention to support medicine optimisation in primary care: qualitative study using strong structuration theory , 2017, BMJ Open.

[8]  L. Hamre.  Exploring the use of social capital to support technology adoption and implementation , 2008 .

[9]  Manuel J. Sánchez-Franco,et al.  Web acceptance and usage model: A comparison between goal-directed and experiential web users , 2005, Internet Res..

[10]  David Lei,et al.  Management practices in learning organizations , 1992 .

[11]  Erping Wang,et al.  How Affectively-Based and Cognitively-Based Attitudes Drive Intergroup Behaviours: The Moderating Role of Affective-Cognitive Consistency , 2013, PloS one.

[12]  Ivana Mamić Sačer,et al.  Information Technology and Accounting Information Systems’ Quality in Croatian Middle and Large Companies , 2013 .

[13]  DongPing Tang,et al.  A review of the evolution of research on information Technology Acceptance Model , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Business Management and Electronic Information.

[14]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[15]  B. Marakarkandy,et al.  Re‐examining and empirically validating the End User Computing Satisfaction models for satisfaction measurement in the internet banking context , 2013 .

[16]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Information systems use as strategy practice: A multi-dimensional view of strategic information system implementation and use , 2014, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[17]  Priyanka Surendran,et al.  Technology Acceptance Model: A Survey of Literature , 2012 .

[18]  Francesco Polese,et al.  A Brief Review of Systems Theories and Their Managerial Applications , 2010 .

[19]  Jorge Brusa,et al.  Validating the End-User Computing Satisfaction Survey Instrument in Mexico , 2006, Int. J. Technol. Hum. Interact..

[20]  R. Valle,et al.  Training and Performance: The Mediating Role of Organizational Learning , 2014 .

[21]  Christina M. Gardner,et al.  Development of an instrument to measure the acceptance of Internet technology by consumers , 2004, 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the.

[22]  Moez Limayem,et al.  The Impact of Customer Relationship Management on Customer Loyalty: The Moderating Role of Web Site Characteristics , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[23]  Blake Ives,et al.  The measurement of user information satisfaction , 1983, CACM.

[24]  Jane E. Klobas,et al.  A task-technology fit view of learning management system impact , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[25]  Daniel Robey,et al.  User Attitudes and Management Information System Use , 1979 .

[26]  Mohammad Chuttur,et al.  Overview of the Technology Acceptance Model: Origins, Developments and Future Directions , 2009 .

[27]  Yi-Shun Wang,et al.  Measuring e-learning systems success in an organizational context: Scale development and validation , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[28]  V. Yilmaz,et al.  Extending the Technology Acceptance Model for Adoption of E-Shopping by Consumers in Turkey , 2011 .

[29]  Peter B. Seddon.  A Respecification and Extension of the DeLone and McLean Model of IS Success , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..

[30]  B. Weiner,et al.  Implementation Science a Theory of Organizational Readiness for Change , 2009 .

[31]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research , 1985 .

[32]  Madiha Shah,et al.  Impact of Management Information Systems (MIS) on School Administration: What the Literature Says☆ , 2014 .

[33]  Nan Zhang,et al.  User Attitude Towards Mandatory Use of Information Systems: A Chinese Cultural Perspective , 2010, J. Glob. Inf. Manag..

[34]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model , 2003, MIS Q..

[35]  Akinyele Samuel Taiwo.  Customers: Identifying the needs in higher education , 2010 .

[36]  Gregory R. Madey,et al.  A Firm-Level Framework for Planning Electronic Commerce Information Systems Infrastructure , 1999, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[37]  Eric van Heck,et al.  Information quality, trust, and risk perceptions in electronic data exchanges , 2013, Decis. Support Syst..

[38]  James A. Levin,et al.  The principal role in data-driven decision making: using case-study data to develop multi-mediator models of educational reform , 2012 .

[39]  William J. Kettinger,et al.  Business Process Change: A Study of Methodologies, Techniques, and Tools , 1997, MIS Q..

[40]  Akram Jalal Karim,et al.  The significance of management information systems for enhancing strategic and tactical planning , 2011 .

[41]  Kieran Mathieson,et al.  Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[42]  Nils Urbach,et al.  The Updated DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success , 2012 .

[43]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Measuring e-Commerce Success: Applying the DeLone & McLean Information Systems Success Model , 2004, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[44]  Sharifeh Sargolzaei.  Developing Technology Acceptance Models for Decision Making in Urban Management , 2017 .

[45]  Venkateshviswanath,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model , 2000 .

[46]  Leon A. Kappelman,et al.  A Comprehensive Model for Assessing the Quality and Productivity of the Information Systems Function: Toward a Theory for Information Systems Assessment , 1997 .

[47]  Evan W. Duggan,et al.  Measuring Information Systems Delivery Quality , 2006 .

[48]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test† , 1996 .

[49]  Sammy W. Pearson,et al.  Development of a Tool for Measuring and Analyzing Computer User Satisfaction , 1983 .

[50]  Helail Almutairi,et al.  An Empirical Application of the Delone and Mclean Model in the Kuwaiti Private Sector , 2005, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[51]  William J. Kettinger,et al.  Perceived Service Quality and User Satisfaction with the Information Services Function , 1994 .

[52]  Elías Moreno Bas,et al.  Complementing the net benefit approach: A new framework for Bayesian cost-effectiveness analysis , 2009, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[53]  Timothy John Willis,et al.  An evaluation of the Technology Acceptance Model as a means of understanding online social networking behavior , 2008 .

[54]  Jennifer Rowley,et al.  Measuring customer satisfaction in higher education , 1998 .

[55]  Dimitrios Maditinos Nikolaos Mitsinis Dominiki Sotiriadou.  Measuring User Satisfaction with Respect to Websites , 2008 .

[56]  W. B. Adeoti‐Adekeye.  The importance of management information systems , 1997 .

[57]  Im Salinda Weerasinghe,et al.  Students' Satisfaction in Higher Education , 2017 .

[58]  Yi-Shun Wang,et al.  Assessing eGovernment systems success: A validation of the DeLone and McLean model of information systems success , 2008, Gov. Inf. Q..

[59]  Helena Alves,et al.  The influence of university image on student behaviour , 2010 .

[60]  William J. Doll,et al.  The Measurement of End-User Computing Satisfaction , 1988, MIS Q..

[61]  Juhani Iivari,et al.  An empirical test of the DeLone-McLean model of information system success , 2005, DATB.

[62]  Peter B. Seddon,et al.  A Partial Test and Development of the DeLone and McLean Model of IS Success , 1994, ICIS.

[63]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[64]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[65]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[66]  Reza Majdzadeh,et al.  Challenges for Better thesis supervision , 2014, Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran.