How the Statistical Validation of Functional Connectivity Patterns Can Prevent Erroneous Definition of Small-World Properties of a Brain Connectivity Network

The application of Graph Theory to the brain connectivity patterns obtained from the analysis of neuroelectrical signals has provided an important step to the interpretation and statistical analysis of such functional networks. The properties of a network are derived from the adjacency matrix describing a connectivity pattern obtained by one of the available functional connectivity methods. However, no common procedure is currently applied for extracting the adjacency matrix from a connectivity pattern. To understand how the topographical properties of a network inferred by means of graph indices can be affected by this procedure, we compared one of the methods extensively used in Neuroscience applications (i.e. fixing the edge density) with an approach based on the statistical validation of achieved connectivity patterns. The comparison was performed on the basis of simulated data and of signals acquired on a polystyrene head used as a phantom. The results showed (i) the importance of the assessing process in discarding the occurrence of spurious links and in the definition of the real topographical properties of the network, and (ii) a dependence of the small world properties obtained for the phantom networks from the spatial correlation of the neighboring electrodes.

[1]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[2]  R Grave de Peralta Menendez,et al.  Backus and Gilbert method for vector fields. , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[3]  C. Granger.  Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods , 1969 .

[4]  Mingzhou Ding,et al.  Evaluating causal relations in neural systems: Granger causality, directed transfer function and statistical assessment of significance , 2001, Biological Cybernetics.

[5]  R. Oostenveld,et al.  Independent EEG Sources Are Dipolar , 2012, PloS one.

[6]  Katarzyna J. Blinowska,et al.  Determination of EEG activity propagation: pair-wise versus multichannel estimate , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  O. Sporns,et al.  Organization, development and function of complex brain networks , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[8]  J. R. Rosenberg,et al.  The Fourier approach to the identification of functional coupling between neuronal spike trains. , 1989, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[9]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Adaptive reconfiguration of fractal small-world human brain functional networks , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  H. Akaike.  A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[11]  Luiz A. Baccalá,et al.  Partial directed coherence: a new concept in neural structure determination , 2001, Biological Cybernetics.

[12]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Controlling the familywise error rate in functional neuroimaging: a comparative review , 2003, Statistical methods in medical research.

[13]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Evaluation of different measures of functional connectivity using a neural mass model , 2004, NeuroImage.

[14]  Laura Astolfi,et al.  Redundancy in Functional Brain Connectivity from EEG Recordings , 2012, Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos.

[15]  C. J. Stam,et al.  Functional connectivity patterns of human magnetoencephalographic recordings: a ‘small-world’ network? , 2004, Neuroscience Letters.

[16]  J. Haueisen,et al.  The Influence of Brain Tissue Anisotropy on Human EEG and MEG , 2002, NeuroImage.

[17]  Barry Horwitz,et al.  The elusive concept of brain connectivity , 2003, NeuroImage.

[18]  F Cincotti,et al.  Imaging functional brain connectivity patterns from high-resolution EEG and fMRI via graph theory. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[19]  W. M. van der Flier,et al.  Functional neural network analysis in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease using EEG and graph theory , 2009, BMC Neuroscience.

[20]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  THE CONTROL OF THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE IN MULTIPLE TESTING UNDER DEPENDENCY , 2001 .

[21]  Laura Astolfi,et al.  Assessing cortical functional connectivity by partial directed coherence: simulations and application to real data , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[22]  Klaus Lehnertz,et al.  From brain to earth and climate systems: Small-world interaction networks or not? , 2011, Chaos.

[23]  M. Peters,et al.  Volume conduction effects in EEG and MEG. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[24]  K. Gurney,et al.  Network ‘Small-World-Ness’: A Quantitative Method for Determining Canonical Network Equivalence , 2008, PloS one.

[25]  Andrea Mechelli,et al.  A report of the functional connectivity workshop, Dusseldorf 2002 , 2003, NeuroImage.

[26]  Claudio Babiloni,et al.  Inhibition of auditory cortical responses to ipsilateral stimuli during dichotic listening: evidence from magnetoencephalography , 2004, The European journal of neuroscience.

[27]  F Cincotti,et al.  Mapping of early and late human somatosensory evoked brain potentials to phasic galvanic painful stimulation , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[28]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Revealing modular architecture of human brain structural networks by using cortical thickness from MRI. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[29]  Liang Wang,et al.  Parcellation‐dependent small‐world brain functional networks: A resting‐state fMRI study , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[30]  Laura Astolfi,et al.  Estimation of the cortical connectivity by high-resolution EEG and structural equation modeling: Simulations and application to finger tapping data , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[31]  C. Stam,et al.  The functional connectivity of different EEG bands moves towards small-world network organization during sleep , 2008, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[32]  Katarzyna J. Blinowska,et al.  Review of the methods of determination of directed connectivity from multichannel data , 2011, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[33]  Katarzyna J. Blinowska,et al.  Information processing in brain and dynamic patterns of transmission during working memory task by the SDTF function , 2010, 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology.

[34]  D. Tucker,et al.  EEG coherency. I: Statistics, reference electrode, volume conduction, Laplacians, cortical imaging, and interpretation at multiple scales. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[35]  Laura Astolfi,et al.  Testing the asymptotic statistic for the assessment of the significance of partial directed coherence connectivity patterns , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[36]  Laura Astolfi,et al.  Estimation of the effective and functional human cortical connectivity with structural equation modeling and directed transfer function applied to high-resolution EEG. , 2004, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[37]  S. Rombouts,et al.  Hierarchical functional modularity in the resting‐state human brain , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[38]  James Theiler,et al.  Testing for nonlinearity in time series: the method of surrogate data , 1992 .

[39]  Katarzyna J. Blinowska,et al.  A new method of the description of the information flow in the brain structures , 1991, Biological Cybernetics.

[40]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Neurophysiological architecture of functional magnetic resonance images of human brain. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[41]  Wulfram Gerstner,et al.  Extraction of Network Topology From Multi-Electrode Recordings: Is there a Small-World Effect? , 2011, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[42]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Structural Insights into Aberrant Topological Patterns of Large-Scale Cortical Networks in Alzheimer's Disease , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[43]  Michael Eichler,et al.  Abstract Journal of Neuroscience Methods xxx (2005) xxx–xxx Testing for directed influences among neural signals using partial directed coherence , 2005 .

[44]  K. Sameshima,et al.  Connectivity Inference between Neural Structures via Partial Directed Coherence , 2007 .

[45]  V Latora,et al.  Efficient behavior of small-world networks. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[46]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[47]  Andreas Daffertshofer,et al.  Comparing Brain Networks of Different Size and Connectivity Density Using Graph Theory , 2010, PloS one.

[48]  M. Kaminski,et al.  Granger causality and information flow in multivariate processes. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[49]  Martin Suter,et al.  Small World , 2002 .

[50]  N. B. Brookes,et al.  Spin-Orbit Coupling in the Mott Insulator Ca2RuO4 , 2001 .

[51]  R. Kahn,et al.  Efficiency of Functional Brain Networks and Intellectual Performance , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[52]  S. Strogatz.  Exploring complex networks , 2001, Nature.

[53]  G. Fagiolo.  Clustering in complex directed networks. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[54]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations , 2010, NeuroImage.

[55]  O. Sporns,et al.  Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[56]  J. R. Rosenberg,et al.  An extended difference of coherence test for comparing and combining several independent coherence estimates: theory and application to the study of motor units and physiological tremor , 1997, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[57]  Andrew C. N. Chen,et al.  Anticipatory cortical responses during the expectancy of a predictable painful stimulation. A high‐resolution electroencephalography study , 2003, The European journal of neuroscience.

[58]  Schneider Gt,et al.  Partial coherence estimates of brain rhythms. , 1983 .

[59]  G. A. Miller,et al.  Comparison of different cortical connectivity estimators for high‐resolution EEG recordings , 2007, Human brain mapping.

[60]  Febo Cincotti,et al.  Functional frontoparietal connectivity during short-term memory as revealed by high-resolution EEG coherence analysis. , 2004, Behavioral neuroscience.

[61]  C C Turbes,et al.  Partial coherence estimates of brain rhythms. , 1983, Biomedical sciences instrumentation.

[62]  Cornelis J Stam,et al.  Graph theoretical analysis of complex networks in the brain , 2007, Nonlinear biomedical physics.