Finger length and distal finger extent patterns in humans.

The fingers in the adult human hand differ in length and in distal extent. The literature agrees that in the clear majority of males, the distal extent of the ring finger tends to be relatively greater (using the middle finger as standard) than the index finger. However, the results for females vary considerably, with some studies reporting that females show a similar pattern to that of males, while others suggest that the prevalence of a longer index finger is relatively or absolutely more common in females. We provide a review of the literature, and a set of data for both finger length and distal fingertip extent of the finger for a contemporary cohort of young adult females and males (n = 502). Finger length measures favor the ring finger of both sexes, with smaller between-finger differences for females than for males. However, while the distal fingertip extent favors the ring finger of both hands in males, in females the left hand shows no significant differences, and the right hand shows a small index finger advantage. Thus, the sexual dimorphism in finger measures is more strongly expressed in the distal extent of fingertips than in the length of fingers. The sex differences in distal fingertip extent derive from the index finger only, with a lesser distal extent of the index finger, relative to the middle finger, in males than in females.

[1]  F. Baker ANTHROPOLOGICAL NOTES ON THE HUMAN HAND , 1888 .

[2]  A. H. Schultz Growth studies on primates bearing upon man's evolution , 1924 .

[3]  R. George,et al.  Human finger types , 1930 .

[4]  F. Jones,et al.  The Principles of Anatomy as Seen in the Hand , 1942 .

[5]  J. Murty,et al.  Variation and inheritance of relative length of index finger in man. , 1977, Annals of human biology.

[6]  Charles J. Wysocki,et al.  Hand preference and age in the United States , 1992, Neuropsychologia.

[7]  Y. Hérault,et al.  Genetic control of murine limb morphogenesis Relationships with human syndromes and evolutionary relevance , 1998, Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology.

[8]  J T Manning,et al.  The ratio of 2nd to 4th digit length: a predictor of sperm numbers and concentrations of testosterone, luteinizing hormone and oestrogen. , 1998, Human reproduction.

[9]  F. R. Wilson The Hand: How Its Use Shapes the Brain, Language, and Human Culture , 1998 .

[10]  M. Peters,et al.  Description and validation of a flexible and broadly usable handedness questionnaire. , 1998, Laterality.

[11]  M. S. Singh,et al.  The 2nd:4th digit ratio, sexual dimorphism, population differences, and reproductive success. evidence for sexually antagonistic genes? , 2000, Evolution and human behavior : official journal of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society.

[12]  R. Thornhill,et al.  The 2nd:4th digit ratio and asymmetry of hand performance in Jamaican children , 2000, Laterality.

[13]  Andrew D. Huberman,et al.  Finger-length ratios and sexual orientation , 2000, Nature.

[14]  J. Manning,et al.  The ratio of 2nd to 4th digit length and male homosexuality. , 2000, Evolution and human behavior : official journal of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society.

[15]  J T Manning,et al.  The 2nd to 4th digit ratio and autism , 2001, Developmental medicine and child neurology.