Global sensitivity analysis of the blade geometry variables on the wind turbine performance

The need for implementing efficient blade designs gains relevance as wind turbine developments require longer blades. The design of blade geometry, traditionally divided in 2D airfoils and spanwise distributions, is usually addressed as an optimization problem. A correct identification of the design variables is crucial to avoid unnecessary computational cost or insufficient exploration of the design space. This paper deals with the identification of the design variables that affect the wind turbine performance. First, the number of design variables for an accurate airfoil representation is resolved. A methodology, based on statistical hypothesis testing applied to the airfoil approximation errors, is presented to assess the accuracy of types of B-splines. Second, the study is extended to chord and twist distributions besides airfoil geometry with the purpose of assessing the sensitive blade variables in the wind turbine performance. Global sensitivity analysis as multi-variable linear regressions and variance-based methods are used. Latin hypercube sampling is applied to generate efficient inputs. MATLAB-based code is developed to obtain outputs: annual energy production, maximum blade tip deflection, overall sound power level and blade mass. As result of the study, a list of non-affecting variables is deduced. These variables can be avoided in the optimization without loss of gain in the performance. The method is a powerful tool to analyse in a preliminary phase a design problem involving a high amount of variables and complex physical relations by means of combining different multi-disciplinar calculation codes and performing statistical treatments. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  M. Hand,et al.  2011 Cost of Wind Energy Review , 2013 .

[2]  M. Drela XFOIL: An Analysis and Design System for Low Reynolds Number Airfoils , 1989 .

[3]  Michael D. McKay,et al.  Latin hypercube sampling as a tool in uncertainty analysis of computer models , 1992, WSC '92.

[4]  Herbert Martins Gomes,et al.  An airfoil optimization technique for wind turbines , 2012 .

[5]  Stefan Finsterle,et al.  Making sense of global sensitivity analyses , 2014, Comput. Geosci..

[6]  M. Floater,et al.  Parameterization for Curve Interpolation , 2006 .

[7]  Helge Aagaard Madsen,et al.  Optimization method for wind turbine rotors , 1999 .

[8]  David W. Zingg,et al.  An Evolutionary Geometry Parametrization for Aerodynamic Shape Optimization , 2011 .

[9]  J. Samareh Survey of Shape Parameterization Techniques for High-Fidelity Multidisciplinary Shape Optimization , 2001 .

[10]  D. Hamby A review of techniques for parameter sensitivity analysis of environmental models , 1994, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[11]  R. Srinivasan,et al.  A global sensitivity analysis tool for the parameters of multi-variable catchment models , 2006 .

[12]  H. Kleinmichel J. H. Ahlberg, E. N. Nilson, J. L. Walsh, The Theory of Splines and Their Applications. (Mathematics in Science and Engineering, Volume 38.) XI + 284 S. New York/London 1967. Academic Press. Preis geb. $ 13.50 . , 1970 .

[13]  Antonio Filippone,et al.  Airfoil inverse design and optimization by means of viscous-inviscid techniques , 1995 .

[14]  Elia Daniele,et al.  An airfoil shape optimization technique coupling PARSEC parameterization and evolutionary algorithm , 2014 .

[15]  D. C. Janetzke,et al.  Theoretical and experimental power from large horizontal-axis wind turbines , 1982 .

[16]  David W. Zingg,et al.  Approach to Aerodynamic Design Through Numerical Optimization , 2013 .

[17]  E. T. Y. Lee,et al.  Choosing nodes in parametric curve interpolation , 1989 .

[18]  Mark Drela,et al.  Pros & Cons of Airfoil Optimization , 1998 .

[19]  Shigeru Obayashi,et al.  Multiobjective genetic algorithm applied to aerodynamic design of cascade airfoils , 2000, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron..

[20]  R. M. Hicks,et al.  Wing Design by Numerical Optimization , 1977 .