Learning from Errors

&NA; Although error avoidance during learning appears to be the rule in American classrooms, laboratory studies suggest that it may be a counterproductive strategy, at least for neurologically typical students. Experimental investigations indicate that errorful learning followed by corrective feedback is beneficial to learning. Interestingly, the beneficial effects are particularly salient when individuals strongly believe that their error is correct: Errors committed with high confidence are corrected more readily than low‐confidence errors. Corrective feedback, including analysis of the reasoning leading up to the mistake, is crucial. Aside from the direct benefit to learners, teachers gain valuable information from errors, and error tolerance encourages students’ active, exploratory, generative engagement. If the goal is optimal performance in high‐stakes situations, it may be worthwhile to allow and even encourage students to commit and correct errors while they are in low‐stakes learning situations rather than to assiduously avoid errors at all costs.

[1]  B. Underwood,et al.  Fate of first-list associations in transfer theory. , 1959, Journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  H. Terrace,et al.  OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR DISCRIMINATION LEARNING WITH AND WITHOUT " ERRORS " ' , 2005 .

[3]  C. Izawa,et al.  Function of test trials in paired-associate learning. , 1967, Journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  H S Terrace,et al.  Discrimination learning, the peak shift, and behavioral contrast. , 1968, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[5]  C. Izawa,et al.  Optimal Potentiating Effects and Forgetting-Prevention Effects of Tests in Paired-Associate Learning. , 1970 .

[6]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Conditions under which feedback facilitates learning from programmed lessons. , 1972 .

[7]  R. W. Kulhavy,et al.  Feedback and Response Confidence. , 1976 .

[8]  Raymond W. Kulhavy,et al.  Feedback and Response Confidence. , 1976 .

[9]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Depth of Processing and Interference Effects in the Learning and Remembering of Sentences. Technical Report No. 21. , 1977 .

[10]  N. J. Slamecka,et al.  The Generation Effect: Delineation of a Phenomenon , 1978 .

[11]  E. Yalow On Educational psychology: A cognitive view. , 1979 .

[12]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Reasons for confidence. , 1980 .

[13]  Norman J. Slamucka,et al.  The generation effect when generation fails , 1983 .

[14]  LATENCY VARIABILITY IN THE COMPONENTS OF THE AUDITORY EVENT-RELATED POTENTIAL IN DEMENTING ILLNESS , 1985 .

[15]  E Tulving,et al.  Learning and retention of computer-related vocabulary in memory-impaired patients: method of vanishing cues. , 1986, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[16]  R. W. Kulhavy,et al.  Feedback processing and error correction , 1987 .

[17]  C. Dweck,et al.  A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality , 1988 .

[18]  Chen-Lin C. Kulik,et al.  Timing of Feedback and Verbal Learning , 1988 .

[19]  N. Pennington,et al.  Back to the future: Temporal perspective in the explanation of events , 1989 .

[20]  Derek W. Johnston,et al.  The relationship between cardiovascular responses in the laboratory and in the field. , 1990, Psychophysiology.

[21]  Chen-Lin C. Kulik,et al.  The Instructional Effect of Feedback in Test-Like Events , 1991 .

[22]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  Incubation and the persistence of fixation in problem solving. , 1991, The American journal of psychology.

[23]  Raymond W. Kulhavy,et al.  Predicting feedback effects from response-certitude estimates , 1992 .

[24]  Endel Tulving,et al.  The Role of Repetition and Associative Interference in New Semantic Learning in Amnesia: A Case Experiment , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  James W. Stigler,et al.  The Learning Gap: Why our Schools are Failing and What We can Learn from Japanese and Chinese Education. , 1993 .

[26]  R. Bjork Memory and metamemory considerations in the training of human beings. , 1994 .

[27]  Barbara A. Wilson,et al.  When implicit learning fails: Amnesia and the problem of error elimination , 1994, Neuropsychologia.

[28]  L R Squire,et al.  On the acquisition of new declarative knowledge in amnesia. , 1995, Behavioral neuroscience.

[29]  R. Siegler,et al.  How Does Change Occur: A Microgenetic Study of Number Conservation , 1995, Cognitive Psychology.

[30]  T. Landauer,et al.  A Solution to Plato's Problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis Theory of Acquisition, Induction, and Representation of Knowledge. , 1997 .

[31]  E. Higgins,et al.  Regulatory Focus and Strategic Inclinations : Promotion and Prevention in Decision-Making , 1997 .

[32]  P. Black,et al.  Assessment and Classroom Learning , 1998 .

[33]  J. Metcalfe Cognitive Optimism: Self-Deception or Memory-Based Processing Heuristics? , 1998, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[34]  E. Ebbesen,et al.  Retention interval and eyewitness memory for events and personal identifying attributes. , 1998, The Journal of applied psychology.

[35]  John E. Morrison,et al.  Foundations of the After Action Review Process , 1999 .

[36]  E. Tory Higgins,et al.  Promotion and prevention as a motivational duality: Implications for evaluative processes. , 1999 .

[37]  K. Nader,et al.  Fear memories require protein synthesis in the amygdala for reconsolidation after retrieval , 2000, Nature.

[38]  Wu,et al.  Medical error: the second victim , 2000, The Western journal of medicine.

[39]  M. Posner,et al.  Cognitive and emotional influences in anterior cingulate cortex , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[40]  Albert W. Wu,et al.  Medical error: the second victim , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[41]  D. Friedman,et al.  The novelty P3: an event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain's evaluation of novelty , 2001, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[42]  J. Metcalfe,et al.  Errors committed with high confidence are hypercorrected. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[43]  R. Siegler Microgenetic Studies of Self-Explanation , 2002 .

[44]  Jennifer A. Mangels,et al.  Neural correlates of error detection and correction in a semantic retrieval task. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[45]  M. Frese,et al.  INTEGRATING ERRORS INTO THE TRAINING PROCESS: THE FUNCTION OF ERROR MANAGEMENT INSTRUCTIONS AND THE ROLE OF GOAL ORIENTATION , 2003 .

[46]  R. Moreno Decreasing Cognitive Load for Novice Students: Effects of Explanatory versus Corrective Feedback in Discovery-Based Multimedia , 2004 .

[47]  Silvia Mamede,et al.  The structure of reflective practice in medicine , 2004, Medical education.

[48]  H. Pashler,et al.  When does feedback facilitate learning of words? , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[49]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A theory of cortical responses , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[50]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  The Power of Testing Memory Basic Research and Implications for Educational Practice , 2006 .

[51]  J. Metcalfe,et al.  “Blockers” do not block recall during tip-of-the-tongue states , 2007 .

[52]  J. Metcalfe,et al.  The correction of errors committed with high confidence , 2006 .

[53]  R. Dahl,et al.  Increased error-related negativity (ERN) in childhood anxiety disorders: ERP and source localization. , 2006, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[54]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  Test-Enhanced Learning , 2006, Psychological science.

[55]  Nate Kornell,et al.  A cognitive-science based programme to enhance study efficacy in a high and low risk setting , 2007, The European journal of cognitive psychology.

[56]  Michael A. McDaniel,et al.  The generation effect: A meta-analytic review , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[57]  Sigall K. Bell,et al.  Guilty, afraid, and alone--struggling with medical error. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[58]  Henry L. Roediger,et al.  Generalizing test-enhanced learning from the laboratory to the classroom , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[59]  Jane Garbutt,et al.  The emotional impact of medical errors on practicing physicians in the United States and Canada. , 2007, Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety.

[60]  Nate Kornell,et al.  Principles of cognitive science in education: The effects of generation, errors, and feedback , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[61]  Lisa S. Blackwell,et al.  Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: a longitudinal study and an intervention. , 2007, Child development.

[62]  Linda Clare,et al.  Errorless Learning in the Rehabilitation of Memory Impairment: A Critical Review , 2008, Neuropsychology Review.

[63]  Abigail A. Scholer,et al.  Responding to negativity : How a risky tactic can serve a vigilant strategy , 2008 .

[64]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  Correcting a metacognitive error: feedback increases retention of low-confidence correct responses. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[65]  Jonathan L. C. Lee,et al.  Memory reconsolidation mediates the strengthening of memories by additional learning , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[66]  J. Metcalfe,et al.  Evidence that judgments of learning are causally related to study choice , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[67]  Bridgid Finn,et al.  Framing effects on metacognitive monitoring and control , 2008, Memory & cognition.

[68]  A. C. Butler,et al.  Feedback enhances the positive effects and reduces the negative effects of multiple-choice testing , 2008, Memory & cognition.

[69]  M. Frese,et al.  Effectiveness of error management training: a meta-analysis. , 2008, The Journal of applied psychology.

[70]  Asher Koriat,et al.  Easy comes, easy goes? The link between learning and remembering and its exploitation in metacognition , 2008, Memory & cognition.

[71]  Mary F. Wisniewski,et al.  Diagnostic error in medicine: analysis of 583 physician-reported errors. , 2009, Archives of internal medicine.

[72]  Valerie Purdie-Vaughns,et al.  Recursive Processes in Self-Affirmation: Intervening to Close the Minority Achievement Gap , 2009, Science.

[73]  Thomas Goschke,et al.  Modulation of the error-related negativity by induction of short-term negative affect , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[74]  J. Metcalfe,et al.  Delayed versus immediate feedback in children’s and adults’ vocabulary learning , 2009, Memory & cognition.

[75]  R. Bjork,et al.  Unsuccessful retrieval attempts enhance subsequent learning. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[76]  Nate Kornell,et al.  The pretesting effect: do unsuccessful retrieval attempts enhance learning? , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[77]  James Hiebert,et al.  Closing the Teaching Gap , 2009 .

[78]  Lisa K. Fazio,et al.  Surprising feedback improves later memory , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[79]  Karee E. Dunn,et al.  A Critical Review of Research on Formative Assessment: The Limited Scientific Evidence of the Impact of Formative Assessment in Education , 2009 .

[80]  Katherine A. Rawson,et al.  Why Testing Improves Memory: Mediator Effectiveness Hypothesis , 2010, Science.

[81]  Joseph E LeDoux,et al.  Preventing the return of fear in humans using reconsolidation update mechanisms , 2010, Nature.

[82]  H. Terrace Defining the stimulus—A memoir , 2010, Behavioural Processes.

[83]  Lisa K. Fazio,et al.  Correcting False Memories , 2010, Psychological science.

[84]  J. Metcalfe,et al.  Scaffolding feedback to maximize long-term error correction , 2010 .

[85]  Bin Zhao,et al.  Learning from errors: The role of context, emotion, and personality , 2011 .

[86]  Sean H. K. Kang,et al.  Does Incorrect Guessing Impair Fact Learning , 2011 .

[87]  J. Metcalfe,et al.  People's hypercorrection of high-confidence errors: did they know it all along? , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[88]  Shana K. Carpenter,et al.  Semantic information activated during retrieval contributes to later retention: Support for the mediator effectiveness hypothesis of the testing effect. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[89]  Elizabeth J Marsh,et al.  The hypercorrection effect persists over a week, but high-confidence errors return , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[90]  Gene A. Brewer,et al.  Testing unsuccessfully: A specification of the underlying mechanisms supporting its influence on retention , 2012 .

[91]  Asher Koriat,et al.  The self-consistency model of subjective confidence. , 2012, Psychological review.

[92]  Y. Dudai The restless engram: consolidations never end. , 2012, Annual review of neuroscience.

[93]  J. Metcalfe,et al.  Hypercorrection of high confidence errors in children , 2012 .

[94]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  When and why do retrieval attempts enhance subsequent encoding? , 2012, Memory & cognition.

[95]  Janet Metcalfe,et al.  Making related errors facilitates learning, but learners do not know it , 2012, Memory & cognition.

[96]  Janet Metcalfe,et al.  Neural Correlates of People's Hypercorrection of Their False Beliefs , 2012, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[97]  Christopher N. Wahlheim,et al.  Remembering change: The critical role of recursive remindings in proactive effects of memory , 2012, Memory & Cognition.

[98]  Teal S Eich,et al.  The hypercorrection effect in younger and older adults , 2013, Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition.

[99]  N. Anderson,et al.  Updating misconceptions: Effects of age and confidence , 2012, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[100]  N. Iwaki,et al.  Hypercorrection of High Confidence Errors in Lexical Representations , 2013, Perceptual and motor skills.

[101]  Greg H. Proudfit,et al.  Anxiety and error monitoring: the importance of motivation and emotion , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[102]  Christopher N. Wahlheim,et al.  On the importance of looking back: The role of recursive remindings in recency judgments and cued recall , 2013, Memory & cognition.

[103]  Nate Kornell,et al.  The effects of memory retrieval, errors and feedback on learning. , 2014 .

[104]  J. Metcalfe,et al.  Hypercorrection of high confidence errors: Prior testing both enhances delayed performance and blocks the return of the errors , 2014 .

[105]  T. Gog,et al.  Refutations in science texts lead to hypercorrection of misconceptions held with high confidence , 2015 .

[106]  Matthew G. Rhodes,et al.  The role of prior knowledge in error correction for younger and older adults , 2015, Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition.

[107]  K. Rawson,et al.  Retrieval attempts enhance learning, but retrieval success (versus failure) does not matter. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[108]  J. Metcalfe,et al.  On Teaching Old Dogs New Tricks , 2015, Psychological science.