Organisation form, scale effects and efficiency in the British bus industry

The British bus industry is examined in light of fundamental reform in ownership and regulation. The industry is divided between privately and publicly owned companies, with the private sector further split between publicly listed owned subsidiaries and private limited companies. The change in ownership structure since privatization is analysed, and Data Envelopment Analysis used to estimate the extent of returns to scale and technical efficiency, as defined by one output and three inputs. Technical efficiency is further divided into managerial and organisational components, and comparisons made of median efficiency levels using a Mann Whitney statistical test.Increasing returns to scale are found for smaller companies, but the size of such returns varies with the company type. A minimum efficiency scale is identified, with constant returns above this point. A high degree of technical inefficiency is found to be present in the industry, which may initially suggest a lack of competition and reflect the oligopolistic structure that has emerged since privatisation. Privately owned companies are identified as more technically efficient, however this is due to significantly less organisational constraints, and considerable managerial inefficiency exists in this group. It is finally concluded that the high level of inefficiency may not reflect ownership, but rather industry characteristics, and rather than a lack of competition may be indicative of wasteful competition. It is suggested therefore there may be a need to make the market contestable rather than openly competitive.

[1]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[2]  Lennart Hjalmarsson,et al.  Efficiency and ownership in Swedish electricity retail distribution , 1992 .

[3]  A. Markstedt,et al.  IMPACTS OF SUBSIDIES ON THE COSTS OF URBAN PUBLIC TRANSPORT , 1983 .

[4]  B. Golany,et al.  Alternate methods of treating factor weights in DEA , 1993 .

[5]  John E. Beasley,et al.  Restricting Weight Flexibility in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1990 .

[6]  Jonathan Cowie,et al.  MEASURING THE EFFICIENCY OF EUROPEAN RAILWAYS. , 1996 .

[7]  THE POTENTIAL FOR REGULATORY CHANGE IN EUROPEAN BUS MARKETS , 1990 .

[8]  G. Giuliano,et al.  Economies of scale in bus transit: A review of concepts and evidence , 1985 .

[9]  Yaakov Roll,et al.  An application procedure for DEA , 1989 .

[10]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[11]  M. Farrell The Measurement of Productive Efficiency , 1957 .

[12]  P. White WHAT CONCLUSIONS CAN BE DRAWN ABOUT BUS DEREGULATION IN BRITAIN , 1997 .

[13]  David Parkin,et al.  Measuring production efficiency of acute hospitals in Scotland, 1991-94: validity issues in data envelopment analysis , 1997 .

[14]  Anna Matas,et al.  Technical characteristics and efficiency of urban bus companies: The case of Spain , 1998 .

[15]  J. Berechman COSTS, ECONOMIES OF SCALE AND FACTOR DEMAND IN BUS TRANSPORT , 1982 .

[16]  D. Swann The retreat of the state: Deregulation and privatisation in the UK and US , 1988 .

[17]  William W. Cooper,et al.  Evaluating Program and Managerial Efficiency: An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis to Program Follow Through , 1981 .

[18]  K. Button,et al.  AN EXAMINATION OF THE COST STRUCTURES ASSOCIATED WITH PROVIDING URBAN BUS SERVICES IN BRITAIN , 1985 .

[19]  D. Parker Nationalisation, privatisation, and agency status within government : testing for the importance of ownership , 1992 .

[20]  Ray Rees,et al.  The Theory of Principal and Agent: Part 2 , 1985 .

[21]  Jonas Månsson Technical efficiency and ownership : the case of booking centres in the Swedish taxi market , 1996 .

[22]  Gisle Solvoll,et al.  THE COSTS OF BUS OPERATIONS IN NORWAY. , 1995 .

[23]  Martin Williams,et al.  Returns to scale in the United States intercity bus industry , 1981 .