Individual ratings of vividness predict aesthetic appeal in poetry.

[1]  Edmund M. Burke,et al.  A Philosophical Inquiry Into The Origin Of Our Ideas Of The Sublime And Beautiful: With An Introductory Discourse Concerning Taste , 1959 .

[2]  D. F. Marks,et al.  Visual imagery differences in the recall of pictures. , 1973, British journal of psychology.

[3]  D. Watson,et al.  Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  Connie A. Bridge,et al.  The Effects of Reader and Text Characteristics on Imagery Reported During and After Reading , 1989 .

[5]  D. Hanauer.  POETIC TEXT PROCESSING , 1997 .

[6]  Reuven Tsur.  Poetic Rhythm: Structure and Performance: An Empirical Study in Cognitive Poetics , 1998 .

[7]  Elaine Scarry.  Dreaming by the Book , 1999 .

[8]  M. Bradley,et al.  Affective Norms for English Words (ANEW): Instruction Manual and Affective Ratings , 1999 .

[9]  Jennifer M. Talarico,et al.  Emotional intensity predicts autobiographical memory experience , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[10]  H. Leder,et al.  A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments. , 2004, British journal of psychology.

[11]  N. Schwarz,et al.  Processing Fluency and Aesthetic Pleasure: Is Beauty in the Perceiver's Processing Experience? , 2004, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[12]  P. Lang.  International affective picture system (IAPS) : affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual , 2005 .

[13]  E. Holmes,et al.  Mental imagery and emotion: a special relationship? , 2005, Emotion.

[14]  E. Holmes,et al.  Positive interpretation training: effects of mental imagery versus verbal training on positive mood. , 2006, Behavior therapy.

[15]  M. H. Fischer,et al.  Readers’ responses to sub-genre and rhyme scheme in poetry , 2006 .

[16]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The Golden Beauty: Brain Response to Classical and Renaissance Sculptures , 2007, PloS one.

[17]  Östen Axelsson,et al.  Individual differences in preferences to photographs , 2007 .

[18]  M. Bar,et al.  Visual elements of subjective preference modulate amygdala activation , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[19]  Craig K. Enders,et al.  Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: a new look at an old issue. , 2007, Psychological methods.

[20]  P. Janata,et al.  Characterisation of music-evoked autobiographical memories , 2007, Memory.

[21]  D. Västfjäll,et al.  Emotional responses to music: the need to consider underlying mechanisms. , 2008, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[22]  D. Tranel,et al.  Does vivid emotional imagery depend on body signals? , 2009, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[23]  P. Silvia.  Looking past pleasure: Anger, confusion, disgust, pride, surprise, and other unusual aesthetic emotions. , 2009 .

[24]  Martin Skov,et al.  Brain correlates of aesthetic expertise: A parametric fMRI study , 2009, Brain and Cognition.

[25]  Edward A. Vessel,et al.  Beauty and the beholder: highly individual taste for abstract, but not real-world images. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[26]  Panagiotis G. Ipeirotis,et al.  Running Experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk , 2010, Judgment and Decision Making.

[27]  S. Zeki,et al.  Toward A Brain-Based Theory of Beauty , 2011, PloS one.

[28]  M. Tervaniemi,et al.  A Functional MRI Study of Happy and Sad Emotions in Music with and without Lyrics , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[29]  Michael D. Buhrmester,et al.  Amazon's Mechanical Turk , 2011, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[30]  Don Kuiken,et al.  The Experiencing Questionnaire: Locating exceptional reading moments , 2012 .

[31]  Edward A. Vessel,et al.  The brain on art: intense aesthetic experience activates the default mode network , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[32]  A. Meade,et al.  Identifying careless responses in survey data. , 2012, Psychological methods.

[33]  Sianne Ngai.  Our Aesthetic Categories: Zany, Cute, Interesting , 2012 .

[34]  K. Oatley,et al.  Genre or artistic merit?: The effect of literature on personality , 2012 .

[35]  David G. Rand,et al.  The promise of Mechanical Turk: how online labor markets can help theorists run behavioral experiments. , 2012, Journal of theoretical biology.

[36]  T. Eerola,et al.  Can sad music really make you sad? Indirect measures of affective states induced by music and autobiographical memories. , 2012 .

[37]  Paul F Rouzer,et al.  The Princeton encyclopedia of poetry and poetics , 2012 .

[38]  H. Leder,et al.  How art is appreciated. , 2012 .

[39]  Oshin Vartanian,et al.  Impact of contour on aesthetic judgments and approach-avoidance decisions in architecture , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[40]  R. Zatorre,et al.  Interactions Between the Nucleus Accumbens and Auditory Cortices Predict Music Reward Value , 2013, Science.

[41]  S. Kotz,et al.  Aesthetic and Emotional Effects of Meter and Rhyme in Poetry , 2013, Front. Psychology.

[42]  H. Leder,et al.  It felt fluent, and I liked it: subjective feeling of fluency rather than objective fluency determines liking. , 2013, Emotion.

[43]  T. Jacobsen,et al.  Toward a Neural Chronometry for the Aesthetic Experience of Music , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[44]  G. Starr.  Feeling Beauty: The Neuroscience of Aesthetic Experience , 2013 .

[45]  H. Leder,et al.  Ten years of a model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments : The aesthetic episode - Developments and challenges in empirical aesthetics. , 2014, British journal of psychology.

[46]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[47]  A. Jacobs,et al.  Immersing in the stillness of an early morning: Testing the mood empathy hypothesis of poetry reception. , 2014 .

[48]  A. Jacobs.  Cognitive Neuroscience of Natural Language Use: Towards a neurocognitive poetics model of literary reading , 2014 .

[49]  Aenne Brielmann,et al.  How to assess and compare inter-rater reliability, agreement and correlation of ratings: an exemplary analysis of mother-father and parent-teacher expressive vocabulary rating pairs , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[50]  P. Juslin,et al.  What makes music emotionally significant? Exploring the underlying mechanisms , 2014 .

[51]  Claus-Christian Carbon,et al.  The Appeal of Challenge in the Perception of Art: How Ambiguity, Solvability of Ambiguity, and the Opportunity for Insight Affect Appreciation , 2015 .

[52]  A. Jacobs.  The scientific study of literary experience: Sampling the state of the art , 2015 .

[53]  A. Jacobs,et al.  Rhetorical features facilitate prosodic processing while handicapping ease of semantic comprehension , 2015, Cognition.

[54]  Measuring literary experience: Comment on Jacobs (2016) , 2015 .

[55]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Mental Imagery: Functional Mechanisms and Clinical Applications , 2015, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[56]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Peer review and competition in the Art Exhibition Game , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[57]  M. Tervaniemi,et al.  It's Sad but I Like It: The Neural Dissociation Between Musical Emotions and Liking in Experts and Laypersons , 2016, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[58]  A. Jacobs,et al.  Measuring the Basic Affective Tone of Poems via Phonological Saliency and Iconicity , 2016 .

[59]  Richard H. A. H. Jacobs,et al.  Liking versus Complexity: Decomposing the Inverted U-curve , 2016, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[60]  Terry K Koo,et al.  A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. , 2016, Journal Chiropractic Medicine.

[61]  Sonja A. Kotz,et al.  Aesthetic appreciation of poetry correlates with ease of processing in event-related potentials , 2015, Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience.

[62]  Maria Kraxenberger,et al.  Affinity for Poetry and Aesthetic Appreciation of Joyful and Sad Poems , 2017, Front. Psychol..

[63]  R. Brosch.  Experiencing Narratives: Default and Vivid Modes of Visualization , 2017 .

[64]  E. Brattico,et al.  Global Sensory Qualities and Aesthetic Experience in Music , 2017, Front. Neurosci..

[65]  Benedek Kurdi,et al.  Introducing the Open Affective Standardized Image Set (OASIS) , 2017, Behavior research methods.

[66]  H. Leder,et al.  Move me, astonish me… delight my eyes and brain: The Vienna Integrated Model of top-down and bottom-up processes in Art Perception (VIMAP) and corresponding affective, evaluative, and neurophysiological correlates. , 2017, Physics of life reviews.

[67]  Valentin Wagner,et al.  The emotional and aesthetic powers of parallelistic diction , 2017 .