Approach to Describe Knowledge Sharing between Producer and User

Abstract A common strategy of producers to cope with increasing competition is to involve users in their business processes. User integration happens, among other reasons, because producers seek knowledge about product usage. In order to access this knowledge, a plethora of approaches and methods can be applied. Many of these are discussed in different but related domains, such as Open Innovation and Design Thinking. The goal of this paper is to start an investigation of these different approaches and structure them according to a single context. This single context is provided by a model describing the sharing of knowledge between user and producer. In this paper, the sharing is based on the mutual exchange information. Knowledge sharing is facilitated by two strategies: user integration and producer integration. Paradigms such as mass production, mass customization and servitization are put into the context of the model. Within the discussion, more specific approaches like Social Media exploitation, Product Embedded Information Devices, Design for X, product takeback and product services are structured according to the proposed model and the two strategies. The conclusion of this paper names open questions, such as the role of information quality and rewarding users for sharing their information with producers.

[1]  Marina du Plessis,et al.  The role of knowledge management in innovation , 2007, J. Knowl. Manag..

[2]  Klaus-Dieter Thoben,et al.  Content analysis of product usage information from embedded sensors and web 2.0 sources: A first analysis of practical examples , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation/ International Technology Management Conference (ICE/ITMC).

[3]  Federico Adrodegari,et al.  From Ownership to Service-oriented Business Models: A Survey in Capital Goods Companies and a PSS Typology , 2015 .

[4]  William L. Berry,et al.  Approaches to mass customization: configurations and empirical validation , 2000 .

[5]  S. Vandermerwe,et al.  Servitization of business : Adding value by adding services , 1988 .

[6]  Kurt Matzler,et al.  THE KANO MODEL: HOW TO DELIGHT YOUR CUSTOMERS , 1996 .

[7]  Andreas Lindner,et al.  DECISION SUPPORT FOR IMPROVING THE DESIGN OF HYDRAULIC SYSTEMS BY LEADING FEEDBACK INTO PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT , 2011 .

[8]  Donald O. Case,et al.  Looking for Information: A Survey of Research on Information Seeking, Needs and Behavior , 2012 .

[9]  Shaomin Wu,et al.  Warranty Data Analysis: A Review , 2012, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[10]  Dimitris Kiritsis,et al.  Closed-loop PLM for intelligent products in the era of the Internet of things , 2011, Comput. Aided Des..

[11]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[12]  George Q. Huang Design for X , 1996 .

[13]  Dimitris Kiritsis,et al.  Degradation mode and criticality analysis based on product usage data , 2015 .

[14]  Guo Q. Huang,et al.  Design for X : concurrent engineering imperatives , 1996 .

[15]  G. Ritzer,et al.  Production, Consumption, Prosumption , 2010 .

[16]  Insup Lee,et al.  Cyber-physical systems: The next computing revolution , 2010, Design Automation Conference.

[17]  Martin Frické,et al.  The knowledge pyramid: a critique of the DIKW hierarchy , 2009, J. Inf. Sci..

[18]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[19]  Helge Svare User-Producer Dialogue, Workplace Innovation, and Knowledge in a Regional Innovation System , 2016 .

[20]  Tim Baines,et al.  The servitization of manufacturing: A review of literature and reflection on future challenges , 2009 .

[21]  Antonio F. Gómez-Skarmeta,et al.  Web of Things as a Product Improvement tool: Furniture as Case Study , 2012, 2012 Sixth International Conference on Innovative Mobile and Internet Services in Ubiquitous Computing.

[22]  E. Giménez,et al.  Decision-driven marketing , 2014 .

[23]  Michael J. A. Berry,et al.  Data Mining Techniques: For Marketing, Sales, and Customer Relationship Management , 2004 .

[24]  M. Porter,et al.  How Smart, Connected Products Are Transforming Competition , 2014 .

[25]  T S Baines,et al.  State-of-the-art in product-service systems , 2007 .

[26]  Larry E. Wood,et al.  Semi-structured interviewing for user-centered design , 1997, INTR.

[27]  Sari Kujala,et al.  User involvement: A review of the benefits and challenges , 2003, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[28]  E. Hippel Democratizing innovation: The evolving phenomenon of user innovation , 2009 .

[29]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[30]  J. Rayport,et al.  Spark innovation through empathic design. , 1997, Harvard business review.

[31]  Tuuli Mattelmäki,et al.  Observing and probing , 2003, DPPI '03.

[32]  Leela Damodaran,et al.  User involvement in the systems design process-a practical guide for users , 1996, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[33]  M García-Murillo,et al.  Customer knowledge management , 2002, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[34]  Claude E. Shannon,et al.  The mathematical theory of communication , 1950 .

[35]  R. Weiber,et al.  Von der Kundenintegration zur Anbieterintegration: Die Erweiterung anbieterseitiger Wertschöpfungsprozesse auf kundenseitige Nutzungsprozesse , 2009 .

[36]  Andreas Lindner,et al.  Exploiting Service Data of Similar Product Items for the Development of Improved Product Generations by Using Smart Input Devices , 2013 .

[37]  Uday Kumar,et al.  Product support strategy: conventional versus functional products , 2005 .

[38]  Tim Brown,et al.  Design Thinking for Social Innovation , 2010 .

[39]  J. West,et al.  Leveraging External Sources of Innovation: A Review of Research on Open Innovation , 2013 .