Noise and the two-thirds power Law

The two-thirds power law, an empirical law stating an inverse non-linear relationship between the tangential hand speed and the curvature of its trajectory during curved motion, is widely acknowledged to be an invariant of upper-limb movement. It has also been shown to exist in eye-motion, locomotion and was even demonstrated in motion perception and prediction. This ubiquity has fostered various attempts to uncover the origins of this empirical relationship. In these it was generally attributed either to smoothness in hand- or joint-space or to the result of mechanisms that damp noise inherent in the motor system to produce the smooth trajectories evident in healthy human motion. We show here that white Gaussian noise also obeys this power-law. Analysis of signal and noise combinations shows that trajectories that were synthetically created not to comply with the power-law are transformed to power-law compliant ones after combination with low levels of noise. Furthermore, there exist colored noise types that drive non-power-law trajectories to power-law compliance and are not affected by smoothing. These results suggest caution when running experiments aimed at verifying the power-law or assuming its underlying existence without proper analysis of the noise. Our results could also suggest that the power-law might be derived not from smoothness or smoothness-inducing mechanisms operating on the noise inherent in our motor system but rather from the correlated noise which is inherent in this motor system.

[1]  Daniel M. Wolpert,et al.  Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning , 1998, Nature.

[2]  Shrawan Kumar,et al.  Differential Geometry and its Applications , 2007 .

[3]  P. Viviani,et al.  Perceiving and tracking kinesthetic stimuli: further evidence of motor-perceptual interactions. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  A. Berthoz,et al.  Relationship between velocity and curvature of a human locomotor trajectory , 2001, Neuroscience Letters.

[5]  T. Flash,et al.  Comparing Smooth Arm Movements with the Two-Thirds Power Law and the Related Segmented-Control Hypothesis , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  P Viviani,et al.  Perceptual anticipation in handwriting: The role of implicit motor competence , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  P. Viviani,et al.  A developmental study of the relationship between geometry and kinematics in drawing movements. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  P. Viviani,et al.  Biological movements look uniform: evidence of motor-perceptual interactions. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  Apostolos P. Georgopoulos,et al.  Three-dimensional drawings in isometric conditions: relation between geometry and kinematics , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  Paolo Viviani,et al.  Do Units of Motor Action Really Exist , 1986 .

[11]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Smoothness maximization along a predefined path accurately predicts the speed profiles of complex arm movements. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  D. Ostry,et al.  Origins of the power law relation between movement velocity and curvature: modeling the effects of muscle mechanics and limb dynamics. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  T. Flash,et al.  Minimum-jerk, two-thirds power law, and isochrony: converging approaches to movement planning. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  P Viviani,et al.  The Relationship between Curvature and Velocity in Two-Dimensional Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  A B Schwartz,et al.  Direct cortical representation of drawing. , 1994, Science.

[16]  S. Schaal,et al.  Origins and violations of the 2/3 power law in rhythmic three-dimensional arm movements , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  P. Viviani,et al.  The law relating the kinematic and figural aspects of drawing movements. , 1983, Acta psychologica.

[18]  G. Sapiro,et al.  Constant Affine Velocity Predicts the 1 3 Power Law of Planar Motion Perception and Generation , 1997, Vision Research.

[19]  A. A. Handzel,et al.  Geometric Methods in the Study of Human Motor Control , 1999 .

[20]  P Viviani,et al.  Segmentation and coupling in complex movements. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.