Growth and morphological responses of yellow birch, sugar maple, and beech seedlings growing under a natural light gradient

Height and lateral growth, biomass distribution, leaf morphology, and crown architecture were studied in yellow birch (Betula alleghaniensis Britton), sugar maple (Acer saccharum Marsh.), and beech (Fagus grandifolia Ehrh.) seedlings growing under 1-50% of above-canopy light in a sugar maple stand, in Quebec. All three species showed increasing growth with increasing light, but growth of yellow birch was higher and more responsive than that of sugar maple and beech. All three species showed typical sun-shade morphological responses, such as decreasing specific leaf area and leaf area ratio, and increasing leaf area index, with increasing light availability. Sugar maple was morphologically more plastic than the other species. It showed variations in biomass allocation to leaves and branches, a decrease in branch length to seedling height ratio, and a marked increase in the ratio of leaf area to stem length. Although our results clearly demonstrate the ability of these three species to modify several of their morphological features in response to variations in light, they do not show a clear relationship between species shade tolerance and morphological response to light variations. We suggest that species-specific developmental patterns may act as important constraints to morphological acclimation to light variation.

[1]  C. Canham,et al.  Chapter 11 – The Response of Woody Plants to Disturbance: Patterns of Establishment and Growth , 1985 .

[2]  C. Messier,et al.  Growth, allocation, and morphological responses of Betula pubescens and Betula pendula to shade in developing Scots pine stands , 1995 .

[3]  K. Klinka,et al.  Growth of Thuja plicata seedlings along a light gradient , 1994 .

[4]  M. Caldwell,et al.  Plant Architecture and Resource Competition , 1987 .

[5]  Christian Messier,et al.  A simple and efficient method to estimate microsite light availability under a forest canopy , 1996 .

[6]  F. S. Baker.  A Revised Tolerance Table , 1949 .

[7]  John A. Silander,et al.  Sapling growth as a function of resources in a north temperate forest , 1994 .

[8]  F. Bazzaz,et al.  Gap Partitioning among Maples (Acer) in Central New England: Shoot Architecture and Photosynthesis , 1994 .

[9]  Peter B. Reich,et al.  Are shade tolerance, survival, and growth linked? Low light and nitrogen effects on hardwood seedlings , 1996 .

[10]  D. A. King,et al.  Influence of light level on the growth and morphology of saplings in a panamanian forest , 1994 .

[11]  D. Hibbs.  Gap dynamics in a hemlock–hardwood forest , 1982 .

[12]  T. Nakashizuka,et al.  Light climate and growth in shade-tolerant Fagus crenata, Acer mono and Carpinus cordata. , 1995 .

[13]  P. Marks.  On the relation between extension growth and successional status of deciduous trees of the northeastern United States , 1975 .

[14]  A. Takenaka.  Structural variation in current-year shoots of broad-leaved evergreen tree saplings under forest canopies in warm temperate Japan. , 1997, Tree physiology.

[15]  James R. Runkle,et al.  Treefalls Revisited: Gap Dynamics in the Southern Appalachians , 1987 .

[16]  S. Pacala,et al.  Forest models defined by field measurements : Estimation, error analysis and dynamics , 1996 .

[17]  C. Canham.  Suppression and release during canopy recruitment in Acer saccharum , 1985 .

[18]  H. S. Horn.  The adaptive geometry of trees , 1971 .

[19]  Charles D. Canham,et al.  Growth and Canopy Architecture of Shade‐Tolerant Trees: Response to Canopy Gaps , 1988 .

[20]  M. Küppers,et al.  Ecological significance of above-ground architectural patterns in woody plants: A question of cost-benefit relationships. , 1989, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[21]  Steward T. A. Pickett,et al.  Chapter 2 – Disturbance Regimes in Temperate Forests , 1985 .

[22]  P. White.  Corner's Rules in Eastern Deciduous Trees: Allometry and Its Implications for the Adaptive Architecture of Trees , 1983 .

[23]  Thomas J. Givnish,et al.  Plant Stems: Biomechanical Adaptation for Energy Capture and Influence on Species Distributions , 1995 .

[24]  D. Boucher,et al.  Beech–maple coexistence and seedling growth rates at Mont Saint Hilaire, Quebec , 1982 .

[25]  John A. Silander,et al.  Juvenile Tree Survivorship as a Component of Shade Tolerance , 1995 .

[26]  C. Canham.  Suppression and release during canopy recruitment in Fagus grandifolia , 1990 .

[27]  F. Bazzaz.  The Physiological Ecology of Plant Succession , 1979 .

[28]  Philip J. Burton,et al.  A gap-based approach for development of silvicultural systems to address ecosystem management objectives , 1997 .

[29]  R. Carter,et al.  Light-growth response relationships in Pacific silver fir (Abies amabilis) and subalpine fir (Abies lasiocarpa) , 1992 .

[30]  C. Canham.  Different Respones to Gaps Among Shade‐Tollerant Tree Species , 1989 .

[31]  I. Birch,et al.  GROWTH OF TREE SEEDLINGS AS AFFECTED BY LIGHT INTENSITY , 1965 .

[32]  W. Platt,et al.  Replacement Patterns of Beech and Sugar Maple in Warren Woods, Michigan , 1996 .

[33]  K. Loach.  Shade tolerance in tree seedlings. II. Growth analysis of plants raised under artificial shade. , 1970 .

[34]  Han Y. H. Chen,et al.  Effects of light on growth, crown architecture, and specific leaf area for naturally established Pinuscontorta var. latifolia and Pseudotsugamenziesii var. glauca saplings , 1996 .

[35]  Thomas J. Givnish,et al.  Adaptation to Sun and Shade: a Whole-Plant Perspective , 1988 .

[36]  S. Pickett,et al.  Chapter 12 – Responses of Forest Herbs to Canopy Gaps , 1985 .

[37]  S. H. Bicknell.  Development of canopy stratification during early succession in northern hardwoods , 1982 .

[38]  T. Kohyama.  Significance of architecture and allometry in saplings , 1987 .

[39]  C. Messier,et al.  Spatial and temporal variation in the light environment of developing Scots pine stands: the basis for a quick and efficient method of characterizing light , 1995 .

[40]  Christian Messier,et al.  Effets d'un gradient de lumière sur la croissance en hauteur et la morphologie de la cime du sapin baumier régénéré naturellement , 1995 .

[41]  M. Villeneuve,et al.  Evolution des taux de croissance juvénile d'espèces forestières sous trois régimes expérimentaux de compétition , 1984 .