Unifying Conceptual and Spatial Relationships between Objects in HCI

To design interfaces which occupy a continuous space of interaction, the conceptual model of an interface needs to be transferred to a spatial model. To find mappings between conceptual and spatial structure which are natural to people, an experiment is undertaken in which participants organize objects in a semi-circle of shelves around their body. It is analyzed how conceptual relationships between objects such as categorial relationships and sequential relationships within task performance are represented in spatial configurations of objects as chosen by the participants. In these configurations, a strong correlation between conceptual and spatial relationships is observed between objects.

[1]  Hanspeter A. Mallot,et al.  Acquisition vs. Memorization Trade-Offs Are Modulated by Walking Distance and Pattern Complexity in a Large-Scale Copying Paradigm , 2011, PloS one.

[2]  J. Jonides,et al.  Evidence of hierarchies in cognitive maps , 1985, Memory & cognition.

[3]  E. Goffman Where The Action Is , 1969 .

[4]  E. Reed The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1989 .

[5]  David J. Bryant,et al.  Three Spaces of Spatial Cognition , 1999 .

[6]  Stephan Winter,et al.  Spatial Information Theory, 8th International Conference, COSIT 2007, Melbourne, Australia, September 19-23, 2007, Proceedings , 2007, COSIT.

[7]  Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al.  Event structure in perception and conception. , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[8]  A. Jameson Adaptive interfaces and agents , 2002 .

[9]  Jürgen Ziegler,et al.  Integrating Object-Oriented Analysis and Graphical User Interface Design , 1994, ICSE Workshop on SE-HCI.

[10]  G. Vingerhoets,et al.  Conceptual and physical object qualities contribute differently to motor affordances , 2009, Brain and Cognition.

[11]  Robert A. Wilson,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition: How to Situate Cognition , 2008 .

[12]  Sharon J. Derry,et al.  Cognitive schema theory in the constructivist debate , 1996 .

[13]  Peter Pirolli,et al.  Information Foraging , 2009, Encyclopedia of Database Systems.

[14]  Barbara Tversky,et al.  Cognitive Maps, Cognitive Collages, and Spatial Mental Models , 1993, COSIT.

[15]  Bill Hillier The social logic of space / Bill Hallier, Julienne Hanson , 1984 .

[16]  Ava Fatah gen. Schieck,et al.  ArCHI: engaging with museum objects spatially through whole body movement , 2012, MindTrek.

[17]  Bill Moggridge,et al.  Designing interactions , 2006 .

[18]  Gerd Kühn Wohnkultur und kommunale Wohnungspolitik in Frankfurt am Main 1880 bis 1930 : auf dem Wege zu einer pluralen Gesellschaft der Individuen , 1998 .

[19]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society , 2011 .

[20]  Hanspeter A Mallot,et al.  Head and eye movements and the role of memory limitations in a visual search paradigm. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[21]  Guy Wallis,et al.  The prototype effect revisited: Evidence for an abstract feature model of face recognition. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[22]  David E. Kieras,et al.  Using GOMS for user interface design and evaluation: which technique? , 1996, TCHI.

[23]  Curt Burgess,et al.  From simple associations to the building blocks of language: Modeling meaning in memory with the HAL model , 1998 .

[24]  Ehud Sharlin,et al.  On tangible user interfaces, humans and spatiality , 2004, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[25]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Affordance, conventions, and design , 1999, INTR.

[26]  A. Penn Space Syntax And Spatial Cognition , 2003 .

[27]  K. Beach Becoming a bartender: the role of external memory cues in a work-directed educational activity , 1993 .

[28]  Curt Burgess,et al.  Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence , 1996 .

[29]  Gerhard Strube,et al.  Everyday navigation in real and virtual environments informed by semantic knowledge , 2011, CogSci.

[30]  Jacob Buur,et al.  Getting a grip on tangible interaction: a framework on physical space and social interaction , 2006, CHI.

[31]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Where the action is , 2001 .

[32]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  Emerging frameworks for tangible user interfaces , 2000, IBM Syst. J..

[33]  K. Oungrinis,et al.  Rethinking the Human in Technology Driven Architecture , 2012 .