The usefulness of the consensus clinical diagnostic criteria in Brugada syndrome.

BACKGROUND Consensus statements were proposed for the diagnosis of Brugada syndrome (BS). The clinical diagnostic criteria were defined as documented ventricular fibrillation or ventricular tachycardia (VT), family history of sudden cardiac death at <45 years, diagnostic ECGs of family members, inducibility of VT during electrophysiological study, syncope or nocturnal agonal respiration. The clinical validation of these criteria is still missing. Methods and results 280 patients (41 ± 18 years, male: 168 pts) with diagnostic coved type I ECG were included. Consensus clinical diagnostic criteria were present in 244 (87%) patients (40 ± 18 y, 142 males). In 36 pts (13% of the 280 pts, 51 ± 12 years, 27 males) consensus clinical diagnostic criteria were not met. Nine patients (25%) presented with spontaneous type I ECG. Ten of the 36 patients (28%) had a history of atrial fibrillation and 13 (36%) had conduction disease on the baseline ECG. In 23 patients (64%) family screening was not performed. Two of the 36 patients had undocumented syncope during follow-up. Univariate analysis showed no significant difference in event free survival between patients with or without consensus clinical diagnostic criteria. CONCLUSIONS In a significant number of patients with diagnostic ECG pattern the current diagnostic criteria for BS are not met. These patients have frequently spontaneous type I ECG and clinical signs of Brugada syndrome as paroxysmal atrial fibrillation or conduction disturbances. Our results suggest that in patients with a diagnostic type I ECG pattern the current clinical consensus diagnostic criteria have limited added diagnostic value.

[1]  Long-Term Follow-Up of Individuals With the Electrocardiographic Pattern of Right Bundle-Branch Block and ST-Segment Elevation in Precordial Leads V1 to V3 , 2002 .

[2]  H. Morita,et al.  Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Brugada Syndrome , 2008 .

[3]  Wataru Shimizu,et al.  Brugada syndrome: report of the second consensus conference. , 2005, Heart rhythm.

[4]  K. Matsuo,et al.  The prevalence, incidence and prognostic value of the Brugada-type electrocardiogram☆ , 2001 .

[5]  S. Priori,et al.  Natural History of Brugada Syndrome: Insights for Risk Stratification and Management , 2002, Circulation.

[6]  H. Morita,et al.  Atrial fibrillation in patients with Brugada syndrome relationships of gene mutation, electrophysiology, and clinical backgrounds. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  G. Breithardt,et al.  Genotype-phenotype relationship in Brugada syndrome: electrocardiographic features differentiate SCN5A-related patients from non-SCN5A-related patients. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  G. Breithardt,et al.  Genetic basis and molecular mechanism for idiopathic ventricular fibrillation , 1998, Nature.

[9]  A. Coats,et al.  Ethics in the authorship and publishing of scientific articles , 2010 .

[10]  G. Breithardt,et al.  Long-Term Prognosis of Individuals With Right Precordial ST-Segment–Elevation Brugada Syndrome , 2005, Circulation.

[11]  J. Brugada,et al.  Right bundle-branch block and ST-segment elevation in leads V1 through V3: a marker for sudden death in patients without demonstrable structural heart disease. , 1998, Circulation.

[12]  K. Harumi,et al.  Three-year follow-up of patients with right bundle branch block and ST segment elevation in the right precordial leads : Japanese registry of Brugada syndrome , 2001 .

[13]  J. Brugada,et al.  Inferior and Lateral Electrocardiographic Repolarization Abnormalities in Brugada Syndrome , 2009, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[14]  Wataru Shimizu,et al.  Brugada syndrome: report of the second consensus conference. , 2005, Heart rhythm.

[15]  D. Coomans,et al.  The value of a family history of sudden death in patients with diagnostic type I Brugada ECG pattern. , 2011, European heart journal.

[16]  K. Matsuo,et al.  The prevalence, incidence and prognostic value of the Brugada-type electrocardiogram: a population-based study of four decades. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  J. Brugada,et al.  Right bundle branch block, persistent ST segment elevation and sudden cardiac death: a distinct clinical and electrocardiographic syndrome. A multicenter report. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[18]  H. Huikuri,et al.  Prevalence and prognosis of subjects with Brugada-type ECG pattern in a young and middle-aged Finnish population. , 2004, European heart journal.

[19]  T. Iwasaka,et al.  Prevalence and mortality of the Brugada-type electrocardiogram in one city in Japan. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[20]  RamonBrugada,et al.  Determinants of Sudden Cardiac Death in Individuals With the Electrocardiographic Pattern of Brugada Syndrome and No Previous Cardiac Arrest , 2003 .

[21]  J L Rey,et al.  Prevalence of the brugada syndrome in an apparently healthy population. , 2000, The American journal of cardiology.

[22]  C. Antzelevitch,et al.  Atrial fibrillation and Brugada syndrome. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[23]  J. Brugada,et al.  Number of electrocardiogram leads displaying the diagnostic coved-type pattern in Brugada syndrome: a diagnostic consensus criterion to be revised. , 2010, European heart journal.

[24]  J. Towbin,et al.  Sodium channel blockers identify risk for sudden death in patients with ST-segment elevation and right bundle branch block but structurally normal hearts. , 2000, Circulation.

[25]  J. Johnston,et al.  Proposed diagnostic criteria for Stickler syndrome , 2000 .

[26]  K. Shimamoto,et al.  Prevalence of asymptomatic ST segment elevation in right precordial leads with right bundle branch block (Brugada-type ST shift) among the general Japanese population , 2001, Heart.

[27]  D. Tamborero,et al.  Gender differences in clinical manifestations of Brugada syndrome. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.