Detection of ultrasonic tones and simulated dolphin echolocation clicks by a teleost fish, the American shad (Alosa sapidissima).

The authors previously reported that American shad (Alosa sapidissima) can detect sounds from 100 Hz to 180 kHz, with two regions of best sensitivity, one from 200 to 800 Hz and the other from 25 to 150 kHz [Mann et al., Nature 389, 341 (1997)]. These results demonstrated ultrasonic hearing by shad, but thresholds at lower frequencies were potentially masked by background noise in the experimental room. In this study, the thresholds of the American shad in a quieter and smaller tank, as well as thresholds for detecting stimulated echolocation sounds of bottlenosed dolphins was determined. Shad had lower thresholds for detection (from 0.2 to 0.8 kHz) in the quieter and smaller tank compared with the previous experiment, with low-frequency background noise but similar thresholds at ultrasonic frequencies. Shad were also able to detect echolocation clicks with a threshold of 171 dB re: 1 microPa peak to peak. If spherical spreading and an absorption coefficient of 0.02 dB/m of dolphin echolocation clicks are assumed, shad should be able to detect echolocating Tursiops truncatus at ranges up to 187 m. The authors propose that ultrasonic hearing evolved in shad in response to selection pressures from echolocating odontocete cetaceans.

[1]  A. Popper,et al.  The herring ear has a unique receptor pattern , 1979, Nature.

[2]  A. Solow,et al.  Acoustic alarms reduce porpoise mortality , 1997, Nature.

[3]  P. S. Enger,et al.  Hearing in herring. , 1967, Comparative biochemistry and physiology.

[4]  Sheryl Coombs,et al.  Neural mechanisms in sound detection and temporal summation , 1983, Hearing Research.

[5]  J. Gray,et al.  Morphology of the utricular recess in the sprat , 1980, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.

[6]  A. Popper,et al.  A clupeid fish can detect ultrasound , 1997, Nature.

[7]  J Astrup,et al.  DETECTION OF INTENSE ULTRASOUND BY THE COD GADUS MORHUA , 1993 .

[8]  W N Tavolga,et al.  Acoustic frequency discrimination in the goldfish. , 1968, Animal behaviour.

[9]  B. Møhl,et al.  Discrimination between high and low repetition rates of ultrasonic pulses by the cod , 1998 .

[10]  R. Thorne,et al.  Response of Alewives to High-Frequency Sound at a Power Plant Intake on Lake Ontario , 1993 .

[11]  M. Cox,et al.  Automated Noninvasive Motion Measurement of Auditory Organs in Fish Using Ultrasound , 1987 .

[12]  J. Gray,et al.  The analysis of sound by the sprat ear , 1979, Nature.

[13]  J. S. Nelson,et al.  Fishes of the world. , 1978 .

[14]  Dennis J. Dunning,et al.  Alewives Avoid High-Frequency Sound , 1992 .

[15]  Reducing Impingement of Alewives with High-Frequency Sound at a Power Plant Intake on Lake Ontario , 1996 .

[16]  R. Fay,et al.  Structure of the Mammalian Cochlea , 1994 .

[17]  Gene R. Ploskey,et al.  Responses of Blueback Herring to High-Frequency Sound and Implications for Reducing Entrainment at Hydropower Dams , 1992 .

[18]  Peter H. Rogers,et al.  Underwater Sound as a Biological Stimulus , 1988 .

[19]  A. Popper,et al.  Otolith Organ Receptor Morphology in Herring-like Fishes , 1981 .

[20]  A. Popper Pure‐Tone Auditory Thresholds for the Carp, Cyprinis carpio , 1972 .

[21]  J. Gray,et al.  The auditory bullae–swimbladder system in late stage herring larvae , 1981, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.

[22]  K. D. Roeder The behaviour of free flying moths in the presence of artificial ultrasonic pulses , 1962 .

[23]  D. Domning,et al.  STATUS OF STUDIES ON FOSSIL MARINE MAMMALS , 1985 .

[24]  J. Gray,et al.  The mechanics of the clupeid acoustico-lateralis system: frequency responses , 1979, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.