An appealing feature of multiple imputation is the simplicity of the rules for combining the multiple complete-data inferences into a final inference, the repeated-imputation inference (Rubin, 1987). This inference is based on a t distribution and is derived from a Bayesian paradigm under the assumption that the complete-data degrees of freedom, ν com , are infinite, but the number of imputations, m, is finite. When ν com is small and there is only a modest proportion of missing data, the calculated repeated-imputation degrees of freedom, ν m , for the t reference distribution can be much larger than ν com , which is clearly inappropriate. Following the Bayesian paradigm, we derive an adjusted degrees of freedom, ν m , with the following three properties: for fixed m and estimated fraction of missing information, ν m monotonically increases in ν com ; ν m is always less than or equal to ν com ; and ν m equals ν m when ν com is infinite. A small simulation study demonstrates the superior frequentist performance when using ν m rather than ν m .
[1]
D. Rubin.
Multiple Imputation After 18+ Years
,
1996
.
[2]
D. Rubin.
INFERENCE AND MISSING DATA
,
1975
.
[3]
Donald B. Rubin,et al.
Performing likelihood ratio tests with multiply-imputed data sets
,
1992
.
[4]
D. Rubin,et al.
Multiple Imputation for Interval Estimation from Simple Random Samples with Ignorable Nonresponse
,
1986
.
[5]
Xiao-Li Meng,et al.
Multiple-Imputation Inferences with Uncongenial Sources of Input
,
1994
.
[6]
Joseph L Schafer,et al.
Analysis of Incomplete Multivariate Data
,
1997
.