Evolution of Near-Miss Clones

It is often claimed that duplicated source code fragments increase the maintenance effort in software systems. To investigate the impact of so called clones it is useful to analyze how they evolve. A previous study analyzed several aspects of the evolution of identical clones in nine open source systems and has found that the peculiarity of clone evolution is significantly different for each system, which makes a general conclusion difficult. In this paper we investigate in which ways the evolution of near-miss clones differs from the evolution of identical clones. By analyzing seven open source systems we draw comparisons between identical and near-miss clones. Based on the findings we conclude that near-miss clones require more attention regarding clone management techniques compared to identical clones.

[1]  Michael W. Godfrey,et al.  "Cloning Considered Harmful" Considered Harmful , 2006, 2006 13th Working Conference on Reverse Engineering.

[2]  Jens Krinke,et al.  Is Cloned Code More Stable than Non-cloned Code? , 2008, 2008 Eighth IEEE International Working Conference on Source Code Analysis and Manipulation.

[3]  Rainer Koschke,et al.  Studying clone evolution using incremental clone detection , 2013, J. Softw. Evol. Process..

[4]  Lerina Aversano,et al.  How Clones are Maintained: An Empirical Study , 2007, 11th European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering (CSMR'07).

[5]  Hagen Hagen.  Is Cloned Code more stable than Non-Cloned Code? , 2008 .

[6]  Ying Zou,et al.  An Empirical Study on Inconsistent Changes to Code Clones at Release Level , 2009, 2009 16th Working Conference on Reverse Engineering.

[7]  Nils Göde.  Clone evolution , 2011 .

[8]  Nils Göde,et al.  Evolution of Type-1 Clones , 2009, 2009 Ninth IEEE International Working Conference on Source Code Analysis and Manipulation.

[9]  Bashar Nuseibeh,et al.  Evaluating the Harmfulness of Cloning: A Change Based Experiment , 2007, Fourth International Workshop on Mining Software Repositories (MSR'07:ICSE Workshops 2007).

[10]  Jens Krinke,et al.  A Study of Consistent and Inconsistent Changes to Code Clones , 2007, 14th Working Conference on Reverse Engineering (WCRE 2007).

[11]  Shinji Kusumoto,et al.  On detection of gapped code clones using gap locations , 2002, Ninth Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference, 2002..

[12]  Chanchal Kumar Roy,et al.  An automatic framework for extracting and classifying near-miss clone genealogies , 2011, 2011 27th IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance (ICSM).

[13]  Giuliano Antoniol,et al.  Analyzing cloning evolution in the Linux kernel , 2002, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[14]  Chanchal Kumar Roy,et al.  Evaluating Code Clone Genealogies at Release Level: An Empirical Study , 2010, 2010 10th IEEE Working Conference on Source Code Analysis and Manipulation.

[15]  Hsiao Hui Mui,et al.  Studying Late Propagations Using Software Repository Mining , 2010 .

[16]  Miryung Kim,et al.  An empirical study of code clone genealogies , 2005, ESEC/FSE-13.

[17]  Lerina Aversano,et al.  An empirical study on the maintenance of source code clones , 2010, Empirical Software Engineering.

[18]  Katsuro Inoue,et al.  Analysis of the Linux Kernel Evolution Using Code Clone Coverage , 2007, Fourth International Workshop on Mining Software Repositories (MSR'07:ICSE Workshops 2007).

[19]  Nils Göde,et al.  Clone Stability , 2011, 2011 15th European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering.

[20]  Rainer Koschke,et al.  Frequency and risks of changes to clones , 2011, 2011 33rd International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE).

[21]  Nils Göde,et al.  Oops! . . . I changed it again , 2011, IWSC '11.

[22]  Foutse Khomh,et al.  Late propagation in software clones , 2011, 2011 27th IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance (ICSM).

[23]  Manishankar Mondal,et al.  Comparative stability of cloned and non-cloned code: an empirical study , 2012, SAC '12.

[24]  Tibor Gyimóthy,et al.  Clone Smells in Software Evolution , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance.