Building shared accountability into service transformation partnerships

Governments at all levels in Canada have entered into partnerships with the industry to effect user-focused, cross-agency service integration and multichannel service delivery. This article examines the problem of developing shared accountability mechanisms for public-private service transformation partnerships, which satisfy the demands of new business relationships and traditional democratic governance values. It first explores the widening canvas of collaborative information technology-driven partnerships and then draws on the emerging shared accountability literature and practices to set out five conditions which should be met in the establishment of a shared accountability regime for such partnerships. These criteria statements are used to analyse the accountability provisions of a new partnership between Service BC (the lead service delivery entity for the British Columbia government) and a consortium led by IBM Canada. The most significant shortcoming would appear to be its very limited public dimension. The article ends with a discussion of how that problem might be addressed.

[1]  Stuart Culbertson.  E-Government and Organizational Change , 2005 .

[2]  Michael Sommer,et al.  The World of E-Government , 2003 .

[3]  Perri,et al.  Joined‐up government and privacy in the United Kingdom: managing tensions between data protection and social policy. Part II , 2005 .

[4]  G. Paquet,et al.  E-Government and Private-Public Partnerships: Relational Challenges and Strategic Directions , 2005 .

[5]  Jeffrey Roy,et al.  E-service delivery and new governance capacities: 'Service Canada' as a case study , 2006, Int. J. Serv. Technol. Manag..

[6]  J. Fountain.  Building the Virtual State: Information Technology and Institutional Change , 2001 .

[7]  Chris Skelcher,et al.  Jurisdictional Integrity, Polycentrism, and the Design of Democratic Governance , 2005 .

[8]  A. Barton.  Public sector accountability and commercial‐in‐confidence outsourcing contracts , 2006 .

[9]  G. Paquet,et al.  E-Government as Collaborative Governance: Structural, Accountability and Cultural Reform , 2005 .

[10]  G. Hodge.  The risky business of public–private partnerships , 2004 .

[11]  Mark Considine,et al.  The End of the Line? Accountable Governance in the Age of Networks, Partnerships, and Joined-Up Services , 2002 .

[12]  G. Paquet.  There is more to governance than public candelabras: E-governance and Canada's public service , 2003 .

[13]  Peter Wilkins,et al.  Accountability and Joined-up Government , 2002 .

[14]  John W. Langford,et al.  Partnering for e-government: Challenges for public administrators , 2001 .

[15]  M. Flinders,et al.  The Politics of Public–Private Partnerships , 2005 .

[16]  Peter Walsh,et al.  Collaboration of public sector agencies: reporting and accountability challenges , 2004 .

[17]  S. Borins,et al.  A Holistic View of Public Sector Information Technology , 2005 .

[18]  Tony Cornford,et al.  THE STATE, DEMOCRACY AND THE LIMITS OF NEW PUBLIC MANAGEMENT: EXPLORING ALTERNATIVE MODELS OF E- GOVERNMENT , 2006 .

[19]  E. Kamarck.  Applying 21st-Century Government to the Challenge of Homeland Security , 2002 .

[20]  George S. Yip,et al.  The Digital Transformation of Traditional Businesses , 2003 .

[21]  Jeffrey Roy,et al.  The Relational Dynamics of E-Governance , 2003 .

[22]  K. Kernaghan,et al.  Integrating information technology into public administration: Conceptual and practical considerations , 2004 .

[23]  D. Savoie.  Searching for accountability in a government without boundaries , 2004 .

[24]  Patrick Dunleavy,et al.  New public management is dead. Long live digital-era governance , 2005 .

[25]  John Langford,et al.  E-government and public-private partnerships in Canada: when failure is no longer an option , 2006, Int. J. Electron. Bus..