The purpose of this paper is to briefly describe and compare the original goals and perspectives of both rhetoric and dialectic in theory and in practice. Dialectic is the practice and theory of conversations; rhetoric that of speeches. For theory of dialectic, this paper will turn to Aristotle's Topics and Sophistical Refutations; for theory of rhetoric, to his Rhetoric. Thus it will appear that rhetoric and dialectic are pretty close. Yet, on the other hand, there is a long tradition of mutual antagonism. The paper tries to summarize the common features of, as well as the differences between, the two. To get a taste of both dialectic and rhetoric in practice the reader is invited to enter the House of Callias, as we know it from Plato's Protagoras. After this visit there remains no doubt that rhetoric and dialectic are intertwined on the level of practice. Moreover, we may look forward to their integration on the level of theory.
[1]
D. Walton,et al.
Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning
,
1995
.
[2]
G. Vlastos,et al.
Plato's Earlier Dialectic.
,
1942
.
[3]
F. H. Eemeren,et al.
Speech acts in Argumentative Discussions. A Theoretical Model for the Analysis of Discussions Directed towards Solving Conflicts of Opinion (vertaling in het Russisch)
,
1984
.
[4]
Robert Bolton.
The Problem of Dialectical Reasoning (Συλλογισμόϛ) in Aristotle
,
1994
.
[5]
T. Irwin.
Aristotle's First Principles
,
1988
.
[6]
Erik C. W. Krabbe,et al.
From axiom to dialogue
,
1982
.
[7]
Aristotle,et al.
The Art of Rhetoric
,
1924
.
[8]
F. H. Eemeren,et al.
Delivering the goods in critical discussion
,
1999
.