Commissioning experience with cone‐beam computed tomography for image‐guided radiation therapy

This paper reports on the commissioning of an Elekta cone‐beam computed tomography (CT) system at one of the first U.S. sites to install a “regular,” off‐the‐shelf Elekta Synergy (Elekta, Stockholm, Sweden) accelerator system. We present the quality assurance (QA) procedure as a guide for other users. The commissioning had six elements: (1) system safety, (2) geometric accuracy (agreement of megavoltage and kilovoltage beam isocenters), (3) image quality, (4) registration and correction accuracy, (5) dose to patient and dosimetric stability, and (6) QA procedures. The system passed the safety tests, and agreement of the isocenters was found to be within 1 mm. Using a precisely moved skull phantom, the reconstruction and alignment algorithm was found to be accurate within 1 mm and 1 degree in each dimension. Of 12 measurement points spanning a 9×9×15‐cm volume in a Rando phantom (The Phantom Laboratory, Salem, NY), the average agreement in the x, y, and z coordinates was 0.10 mm, −0.12 mm, and 0.22 mm [standard deviations (SDs): 0.21 mm, 0.55 mm, 0.21 mm; largest deviations: 0.6 mm, 1.0 mm, 0.5 mm] respectively. The larger deviation for the y component can be partly attributed to the CT slice thickness of 1 mm in that direction. Dose to the patient depends on the machine settings and patient geometry. To monitor dose consistency, air kerma (output) and half‐value layer (beam quality) are measured for a typical clinical setting. Air kerma was 6.3 cGy (120 kVp, 40 mA, 40 ms per frame, 360‐degree scan, S20 field of view); half value layer was 7.1 mm aluminum (120 kV, 40 mA). We suggest performing items 1, 2, and 3 monthly, and 4 and 5 annually. In addition, we devised a daily QA procedure to verify agreement of the megavoltage and kilovoltage isocenters using a simple phantom containing three small steel balls. The frequency of all checks will be reevaluated based on data collected during about 1 year. PACS number: 87.53.Xd

[1]  J. Wong,et al.  Flat-panel cone-beam computed tomography for image-guided radiation therapy. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  Image-Guided Radiation Therapy Committee , 2001 .

[3]  David A Jaffray,et al.  The stability of mechanical calibration for a kV cone beam computed tomography system integrated with linear accelerator. , 2005, Medical physics.

[4]  Hazim Jaradat,et al.  The utility of megavoltage computed tomography images from a helical tomotherapy system for setup verification purposes. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  J. Debus,et al.  Correction of patient positioning errors based on in-line cone beam CTs: clinical implementation and first experiences , 2005, Radiation oncology.

[6]  M van Herk,et al.  Quantification of organ motion during conformal radiotherapy of the prostate by three dimensional image registration. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  Avraham Eisbruch,et al.  Design and implementation of an anthropomorphic quality assurance phantom for intensity-modulated radiation therapy for the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  Jan-Jakob Sonke,et al.  Automatic prostate localization on cone-beam CT scans for high precision image-guided radiotherapy. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  L Xing,et al.  Motion correction for improved target localization with on-board cone-beam computed tomography , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  P J Biggs,et al.  AAPM code of practice for radiotherapy accelerators: report of AAPM Radiation Therapy Task Group No. 45. , 1994, Medical physics.

[11]  J. Pouliot,et al.  Megavoltage cone-beam CT: system description and clinical applications. , 2006, Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.

[12]  M. V. van Herk,et al.  Respiratory correlated cone beam CT. , 2005, Medical physics.

[13]  G T Chen,et al.  Using serial imaging data to model variabilities in organ position and shape during radiotherapy. , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  P. Munro,et al.  Clinical use of electronic portal imaging: report of AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 58. , 2001, Medical physics.

[15]  Fang-Fang Yin,et al.  A technique for on-board CT reconstruction using both kilovoltage and megavoltage beam projections for 3D treatment verification. , 2005, Medical physics.

[16]  David Jaffray,et al.  First clinical experience with cone-beam CT guided radiation therapy; evaluation of dose and geometric accuracy , 2004 .

[17]  D A Jaffray,et al.  A radiographic and tomographic imaging system integrated into a medical linear accelerator for localization of bone and soft-tissue targets. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  J H Siewerdsen,et al.  A performance comparison of flat-panel imager-based MV and kV cone-beam CT. , 2002, Medical physics.

[19]  G T Chen,et al.  Numerical analysis of a model of organ motion using serial imaging measurements from prostate radiotherapy. , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.

[20]  Lisa Grimm,et al.  Commissioning and Clinical Implementation of a Sliding Gantry CT Scanner Installed in an Existing Treatment Room and Early Clinical Experience for Precise Tumor Localization , 2003, American journal of clinical oncology.

[21]  S M Seltzer,et al.  AAPM protocol for 40-300 kV x-ray beam dosimetry in radiotherapy and radiobiology. , 2001, Medical physics.

[22]  Lei Dong,et al.  Experience of ultrasound-based daily prostate localization. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[23]  T. Rockwell Mackie,et al.  Helical Tomotherapy: An Innovative Technology and Approach to Radiation Therapy , 2002, Technology in cancer research & treatment.

[24]  David A Jaffray,et al.  Patient dose from kilovoltage cone beam computed tomography imaging in radiation therapy. , 2006, Medical physics.

[25]  D. Rogers,et al.  AAPM's TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams. , 1999, Medical physics.

[26]  J H Siewerdsen,et al.  Cone-beam computed tomography with a flat-panel imager: initial performance characterization. , 2000, Medical physics.

[27]  John Wong,et al.  Assessment of residual error for online cone-beam CT-guided treatment of prostate cancer patients. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[28]  D. Jaffray,et al.  The influence of antiscatter grids on soft-tissue detectability in cone-beam computed tomography with flat-panel detectors. , 2004, Medical physics.

[29]  B. D. Smith Cone beam convolution formula. , 1983, Computers in biology and medicine.

[30]  Mark Oldham,et al.  Cone-beam-CT guided radiation therapy: A model for on-line application. , 2005, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[31]  D. Yan,et al.  Computed tomography guided management of interfractional patient variation. , 2005, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[32]  M. Oldham,et al.  Cone-beam-CT guided radiation therapy: technical implementation. , 2005, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[33]  Christopher J Moore,et al.  A feasibility study for image guided radiotherapy using low dose, high speed, cone beam X-ray volumetric imaging. , 2005, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[34]  R. Jaszczak,et al.  Cone beam collimation for single photon emission computed tomography: analysis, simulation, and image reconstruction using filtered backprojection. , 1986, Medical physics.

[35]  J. Fowler,et al.  Image guidance for precise conformal radiotherapy. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.